What a retail site plan carries
A retail site plan is a legal and financial instrument as much as a drawing. The preliminary plan places the inline building, any anchor or junior boxes, the pads, the parking field, drive aisles, drive-thru lanes, cross-access, loading and trash, and proves the program in a site data table: gross acreage, building coverage, GLA by building and pad, parking required against parking provided by tenant type, accessible and van-accessible stalls, stacking count per drive-thru, pad acreage, setbacks and access points. Net-lease investors and lenders read the same sheet for provable drive-thru stacking, recorded cross-access and reciprocal easement agreements (REAs), pad separability, and parking adequacy against both zoning and lease covenants [6, 7].
ICSC classifies the strip or convenience center as under 30,000 SF of GLA, anchor-less or with a small convenience anchor, serving a trade area under 1 mile [8]. Practitioners dedicate 20 to 25 percent of the site to building [2]. The preliminary site plan stops at the layout: grading, stormwater design, utilities and grease interceptor sizing are the work of your engineer of record, who builds the sealed set on the plan.
Five layouts cover most retail work:
| Archetype | Layout | Wins when |
|---|---|---|
| Anchored neighborhood strip | By convention, a grocery box of about 25,000 to 65,000 SF at one end or center-rear; inline shops in 20 ft bays, 60 to 70 ft deep, along the frontage; three to four double-loaded parking rows | Rooftops and household income support a full grocery trade area |
| Unanchored convenience strip (8,000 to 20,000 SF by convention) | One linear building 50 to 60 ft deep at the rear, all parking in front, single or dual curb cuts, 24 to 26 ft drive aisle (practitioner conventions), trash and one service door at the rear | Hard corners and mid-block sites with strong traffic counts |
| Pad-heavy hard corner | By convention, 2 to 4 outparcels of 0.5 to 2.0 acres fronting both arterials, a small inline building behind, cross-access tying all pads to one access | Signalized intersections with 25,000-plus AADT (a practitioner rule of thumb) |
| Drive-thru cluster | Two to four drive-thru pads around a shared internal drive, each with independent stacking, windows turned away from the public street | Suburban corridors where drive-thrus are permitted |
| Big-box retrofit | By convention, an 80,000 to 150,000 SF box demised into 3 to 6 junior-anchor and inline tenants, a new pad carved from surplus parking, the REA amended | New construction will not pencil |
Inline building depth and bay module
Retail design practitioners converge on inline depths of 50, 60, and 70 feet: the optimum is around 70 feet, and depth should never exceed 100 feet [1]. Shallow bays of 50 ft suit service tenants (salons, nail, insurance, phone repair) that need frontage and a small back area; 60 to 70 ft bays take soft goods and small-format food with back-of-house storage and restrooms; beyond roughly 70 ft the rear of the space becomes hard to merchandise and lease [1]. A 20 ft bay fits the widest range of small-shop tenants, its multiples (40, 60, 80 ft) align with economical column spacing, and a 25 ft module is used where wider storefronts are marketed [1]. These are conventions, not codified standards; the plan dimensions the shell to the tenant mix the leasing plan expects.
Restaurants change the building, not just the bay. Mixed occupancies are handled under IBC Section 508 as accessory (under 10 percent of the story area), non-separated or separated, so dropping a restaurant into an inline strip can change egress width, separation and sometimes sprinkler requirements for the whole building [9]. In the model code text, a Group A-2 fire area over 5,000 SF, or one with an occupant load of 100 or more, must be sprinklered (Section 903.2.1.2) [10]; local amendments are checked for each project. Retail-to-restaurant interiors are covered under commercial interiors and conversions, and the San Antonio rules are set out below.
The parking field
The parking convention for a strip center is five to six spaces per 1,000 SF, with about four of every five stalls between the road and the storefront; restaurants demand 20 stalls per 1,000 SF [2]. Centers under 10,000 SF carry two rows of parking between street and building, larger centers three, and never more than four [2]. A double-loaded module runs about 62 to 65 ft (an 18 ft stall, a 24 to 26 ft drive aisle and an 18 ft stall), and the main circulation spine runs parallel to the storefront at 24 to 26 ft. Grocery anchors demand roughly 4 to 5 spaces per 1,000 SF.
Adopted minimums are often lower than the convention, and many are gone. Buffalo, New York became the first major US city to abolish parking minimums, in 2017 [11]. Minneapolis eliminated them citywide in 2019, and Austin became the largest US city to do so when its council voted on November 2, 2023, codified via Ordinance C20-2023-010 [12]. California's AB 2097 abolished minimums for developments within one-half mile of major transit, effective beginning 2023 [11], and Chicago's Ordinance SO2025-0015577 relaxed transit-oriented requirements [13]. UCLA's Institute of Transportation Studies counts more than 100 US cities that have eliminated parking minimums [14], and the Parking Reform Network estimates roughly 20 percent of over 3,000 examined codes have abolished or reduced mandates citywide [15]. Where the minimum is gone, the plan sizes parking to tenant and lease demand rather than to a vanished mandate. The blog tracks this in a city-by-city parking comparison and what a parking minimum costs.
Landscaping rules reshape the field. They vary by jurisdiction; these are illustrative of the national range:
| Jurisdiction | Parking lot landscaping rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Bensenville, Illinois | Shade canopy over at least 40 percent of parking-area hardscape; at least one shade tree per island | [16] |
| Provo, Utah, and Greenburgh, New York | 50 percent canopy within 15 to 20 years of planting | [17, 18] |
| Rocky River, Ohio | Interior islands at least 5 percent of lot area for lots of 20-plus cars | [19] |
| Defiance, Ohio | 10 percent of paved area landscaped | [20] |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | At least 1 shade tree per 2,000 SF of parking (1 per 4,000 SF in urban and TOD areas); islands may double as green stormwater infrastructure | [21] |
Outparcels and pads
Pads command the highest rents in a center and can be sold or ground-leased individually. The Boulder Group's president told ICSC that pads command big rents because tenants pay for street exposure, individuality and captive parking, and owners sell or ground-lease surplus land as pads to pay down debt [22]. By practitioner convention, pads range from 0.5 to 2.0 acres [4]. Under a ground lease the developer keeps the land and the tenant builds and owns the improvements for the term, usually reverting at expiry; lenders compare the leasehold term with the loan term.
Separability is the value driver: a pad that can be legally subdivided, financed and sold on its own needs a recorded REA or declaration and separable title [7]. REAs are recorded instruments that set the terms, conditions and obligations for the easements, restrictions and covenants between owners; they let parcels in a center share access, parking, drainage and signage as one development [6]. On plan they are drawn as access-easement strips connecting adjacent parcels' drive aisles, so traffic moves between parcels without returning to the arterial. The ABA also warns that outparcel buildings can obstruct a tenant's visibility and that outparcel parking demand can impair a tenant's reserved parking [6], which is why pad placement and the REA exhibit are drawn together. TxDOT and other agencies allow reduced corner clearance and fewer driveways only where shared access is established [23], so the plan draws cross-access stubs to adjacent parcels even where the neighbor is undeveloped.
Fuel and car wash pads carry their own standards: see gas station site plans, the Gwinnett County gas station model project and car wash site plans. A hotel on a center's surplus land follows hotel site plans.
Drive-thru stacking
Stacking is measured in vehicles, by convention 18 to 20 ft per vehicle, from the order point or window, and it is set by municipal code.
| Rule | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Food and QSR | Minimum 10 stacking spaces typical (convention) | [3] |
| Bank, pharmacy, other non-food | Minimum 4 (convention) | [3] |
| Rule of thumb | 6 to 8 vehicle lengths per lane: 4 before the menu board plus 3 between the board and the window | [24] |
| Pembroke Pines, Florida, Sec. 155.611 | Lanes at least 10 ft wide, 20 ft of length per required vehicle, escape lanes required | [25] |
| Olathe, Kansas | 12 ft minimum lane width, reduced only with a professional traffic engineer's study; speaker setback such as 50 ft from residential | [26] |
| High-volume coffee and QSR brands | 12 to 30 cars, an operations convention rather than a code minimum | [27] |
Stacking matters to the buyer as much as to the planner. A Northwestern Kellogg cellphone-tracking study found drive-thru reliance equivalent to Starbucks deriving roughly 50 percent of total revenue from the drive-thru, and QSRs without a drive-thru suffered a 50 percent sales drop from 2019 to 2022, against a 4 percent dip for those with one [27]. Net-lease investors verify the stack before they price the pad [28]. That is driving dual-lane and escape-lane layouts that exceed legacy code minimums [27].
Drive-thrus are also being restricted. Minneapolis banned new drive-thru windows citywide in 2019, the first US city to do so, after already restricting them in 17 of 23 zoning districts; existing drive-thrus were grandfathered [29]. In St. Paul, a traditional-neighborhoods zoning study adopted in November 2025 requires that pedestrians not cross a drive-thru lane to enter new non-industrial buildings [30, 31]. Conditions commonly imposed elsewhere: speaker orientation and setback from residential, solid screening, windows not facing the street, required escape lanes, and hours limits [26].
Loading, trash and service circulation
The standard local delivery vehicle is the SU-30, a 30 ft single unit; the WB-40 and WB-50 are small tractor-trailers named by wheelbase, and the WB-67 is the interstate design vehicle [32]. A WB-50 is 8.5 ft wide with wheelbases of 20 and 30 ft [33]. By design-guide convention, service roads run 14 ft minimum one-way and 26 ft two-way, right-angle turns for commercial vehicles need a 50 ft radius, and counterclockwise circulation is preferred so drivers make left turns and back trailers on the driver side [34]. The basic choice is rear service, by convention a dedicated rear corridor of 20 to 30 ft with a screened trash corral, against front-loaded service on small centers with no rear access; rear service is preferred wherever lot depth allows. Trash enclosures are screened masonry corrals sized for front-load dumpsters or compactors and placed for a straight truck approach and backing path [34].
Food tenants need grease interceptors, and their location is a site plan decision. Gravity grease interceptors typically hold 500 to 5,000 gallons and sit outside, in-ground; hydromechanical units handle roughly 20 to 100 GPM under the sink [35]. The code basis is IPC Section 1003 and UPC Section 1014, and the IPC specifies 30 minutes of retention [36]; a UPC Table 1014.3.6 example yields 750 gallons for a typical restaurant [37]. On plan, the exterior interceptor sits in the drive or service area upstream of the sanitary connection where a vacuum pump truck can reach the access covers, and most sewer districts require an exterior unit for full-service food [35]. Your engineer of record sizes it against the local sewer district's rule.
Access, traffic and stormwater rules by state
State DOTs control the driveways on arterials, and their rules decide where a pad can take access:
| State | Access management rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Minimum corner clearance in TxDOT Table 2-2; lesser spacing only where shared access is established with an abutting property | [23] |
| Washington | Corner clearance tied to the managed-access highway class; a design analysis for nonconforming connections | [38] |
| Mississippi | Corner clearance on Type 2 and 3 highways at the greater of a queuing analysis or 125 ft; right-in/right-out or raised medians may be imposed | [39] |
| Florida | FDOT guidebook: connection spacing, corner clearance, throat length, median treatments | [40] |
| Massachusetts | MassDOT design guide Chapter 15: driveway spacing and corner clearance | [41] |
| Alabama | ALDOT manual (Sept 2022): corner clearance defined by connection spacing | [42] |
Traffic study triggers vary widely and are based on ITE trip generation:
| Jurisdiction | Traffic study trigger | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Baltimore County, Maryland | More than 49 trips in any hour | [43] |
| Harford County, Maryland | Full analysis above 249 trips a day; corridor analysis at 1,500-plus trips a day | [44] |
| Idaho (state highways) | 100 peak-hour trips or 1,000 vehicles a day | [45] |
| Wisconsin | About 100 peak-hour trips | [46] |
| Mercer Island, Washington | As low as 10 peak-hour trips | [47] |
A single drive-thru QSR routinely generates well over 100 peak-hour trips, so a traffic study is common on pad-heavy centers and belongs in the budget from the start.
The federal NPDES Construction General Permit is triggered at 1 acre of disturbance, or less if the site is part of a larger common plan of development; operators file a Notice of Intent and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan [5]. State programs mirror the threshold: Washington requires application 60 days before discharge [48]; Georgia and Tennessee trigger at 1 acre [49, 50]; and South Carolina adds weekly-inspection duties above 2 acres [51]. In a large parking field the plan chooses between detention and retention, underground chambers under the drive aisles, and bioretention islands that double as required landscape islands; Raleigh explicitly allows green stormwater infrastructure in parking islands [21]. Detention and retention sizing follows the local drainage criteria manual and is the engineer of record's work.
In California, CALGreen required commercial projects doing certain work to make 15 percent of spaces EV-capable and 5 percent with installed chargers from July 1, 2024 [52]; the 2025 code, effective January 1, 2026, raises installed-charger requirements and splits the table into Office or Retail and Other columns [53]. EV stalls typically sit near the building or electrical room to shorten conduit runs, and an accessible EV space cannot double-count as a required ADA stall. Outside California, retail EV mandates are far less common and mostly come from state or local reach codes.
In the remaining states, access, stormwater delegation and seal rules are set by the state DOT, the permitting agency and the licensing board, and are confirmed site by site.
Accessible parking
Accessible stalls are counted per parking facility, not for the whole site, and go on the shortest accessible route to an accessible entrance [54].
| Total spaces in the facility | Accessible spaces required |
|---|---|
| 1 to 25 | 1 |
| 26 to 50 | 2 |
| 51 to 75 | 3 |
| 76 to 100 | 4 |
| 101 to 150 | 5 |
| 151 to 200 | 6 |
| 201 to 300 | 7 |
| 301 to 400 | 8 |
| 401 to 500 | 9 |
| 501 to 1,000 | 2 percent of total |
| 1,001 and over | 20, plus 1 per 100 over 1,000 |
One of every six accessible spaces, and always at least one, must be van-accessible [54]. Car stalls are 8 ft wide and van stalls 11 ft, with a 5 ft access aisle (or an 8 ft van stall with an 8 ft aisle), and vans need 98 inches of vertical clearance [55]. The blog covers enforcement in ADA compliance in commercial site plans.
Approval path and what the engineer of record adds
| Stage | What the plan shows | Who seals |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-application or concept review | Preliminary site plan: buildings, pads, parking field, stacking, access points, site data table | No seal; many cities and counties accept an unsealed concept plan at this stage |
| Access permit and traffic study | Driveway locations, corner clearance, cross-access stubs; a traffic study where trips pass the local trigger | Traffic engineer; state DOT or county permit |
| Site plan review | Site plan with grading, drainage, utilities, landscaping and stormwater (Notice of Intent and SWPPP at 1 acre) | Engineer of record |
| Pad subdivision | Separable pad parcels, recorded REA and cross-access easements | Licensed surveyor for the boundary and plat |
| Building permit | Shell and tenant construction documents | Architect and engineer of record |
Site plans and construction documents filed with public officials are signed and sealed by the licensed professional in responsible charge: the architect for the building, the PE for civil and site engineering, the PLS for the boundary survey [56]. New Jersey requires site plans filed with agencies to bear an architect's title block and raised seal under N.J.A.C. 5:23-2.15(f) [57]; New York requires the PE, architect or PLS to seal filings under Education Law 7209 [58]; and New Mexico requires both an architect and an engineer above a $600k valuation [59]. The preliminary plan is what those professionals build their sealed sheets on; the preliminary versus final site plan guide sets out the split.
Lenders and appraisers judge the same sheet. A parking count below zoning or market expectation reads to an appraiser as functional obsolescence, a loss in value due to a deficiency in the property itself, measured by paired sales or cost to cure [60]. Recorded cross-access, compliant parking, provable stacking and separable pad title support value; their absence invites deductions and lender conditions.
The 2026 market: retrofit over ground-up
New construction has collapsed: US retail completions fell to 4.7M SF in Q1 2026, the lowest in at least 20 years and down from over 25M SF in Q4 2015, with availability at 4.9 percent [61]. JLL's read is that rents have risen but still do not match construction cost, so leasing existing space beats building new [62]. That makes the big-box retrofit the most common retail re-plan: demise the box, carve a pad from the parking that falling ratios free up, and amend the REA. Where development does happen it is concentrated in the Sun Belt: Texas accounted for over 30 percent of US retail construction in Q1 2026, and Phoenix led all markets with 744,000 SF of new construction [61]. As market evidence from one architecture firm's regional cost guide, Texas strip core-and-shell runs $90 to $120/SF, with tenant finish of $30 to $60/SF, excluding land, financing, soft costs, site work and FF&E [63]. Single-tenant net-lease retail averaged a 6.55 percent cap rate in Q1 2026 [64]. Market commentary on the blog: Houston retail development, the grocery store development playbook and mall redevelopment into mixed use.
Ground-floor retail in mixed-use projects
Where retail sits under housing or offices, the zoning code writes the storefront before the leasing plan does. The asset-level rules are in mixed-use site plans.
| Rule | Example | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Share of frontage | SeaTac, Washington: at least 50% of the street-facing ground floor length, excluding vehicle entrances, designed for retail, commercial or service use | [65] |
| Depth | SeaTac: 30 ft average and 15 ft minimum; Seattle NC zones: the same for non-residential space over 600 SF | [65, 66] |
| Height | Seattle NC zones: 13 ft minimum | [66] |
| Transparency | New York City: 50% between 2 and 12 ft with no blank segment over 10 ft (ZR 37-34); Seattle: 60% between 2 and 8 ft; Airway Heights, Washington: 50% within 20 ft of an arterial | [67, 66, 68] |
Seattle labels its zoning summary illustrative, so the code section governs a live project [66].
Some states are loosening the retail mandate. Texas SB 840 bars a city from requiring a multifamily project in a mixed-use zone to include nonresidential uses, and lets owners convert retail, office or warehouse buildings at least five years old to residential or mixed-use residential by right [69]; it applies only in a city of more than 150,000 people lying wholly or partly in a county of more than 300,000 [70]. Washington's ESSB 5184 (2025) bars parking minimums for ground-level commercial in mixed-use buildings and for commercial spaces under 3,000 SF [71].
Shared parking is where retail and housing fit together. In Alexandria's table, retail runs at 60% of its stand-alone requirement on weekdays, 90% on weekday evenings, 100% on weekend days and 70% on weekend evenings, restaurants at 50%, 80%, 80% and 100%, and residential reaches 100% on both weekday and weekend evenings; the requirement is the highest column total [72]. Clayton County, Georgia uses the same method and lets its Zoning Administrator approve a reduction of up to 25% with inter-parcel access [73].
Retail to restaurant: the San Antonio pattern
An inline retail suite turned into a restaurant is mostly a building-code and site question, and San Antonio shows how it plays out in a strip center. The full model project is office or retail to restaurant conversion in San Antonio. Rules as of October 10, 2026:
- Occupancy. A retail (Group M) suite becoming a full-service restaurant is a change of occupancy to Group A-2 with a new certificate of occupancy, under the 2024 IBC and IEBC adopted by Ordinance 2025-01-30-0075, effective May 1, 2025 [74, 75]. City Code Sec. 10-8(a)(1) requires a design professional to prepare the construction documents for every Group A occupancy [74].
- Zoning. Restaurants are permitted by right in C-1, C-2, C-3 and NC, where NC limits the building to 3,000 SF, and on-premise alcohol at restaurants is allowed in every permitted base district except those carrying an "R" or "NA" designation [76].
- Grease interceptor. Every fats, oils and grease fixture discharges to an interceptor (City Code Sec. 34-526(b)), pumped out at least every 90 days and within 2 working days once it reaches 25 percent wetted height (Sec. 34-527(b)). An exterior unit needs truck-accessible ground, so inline centers often share or relocate parking to fit it [77].
- Patio. A downtown sidewalk café needs an annual permit at $250, $500 or $750 by size, and at least 6 ft of sidewalk must stay clear for pedestrians [78, 79].
- Alcohol distance. Sales within 300 ft of a church, school or hospital need consent or, near a school, a City Council variance; the variance needs six Council votes, is heard 30 to 45 days after a complete filing, and carries a $345 fee [80].
- Historic districts. The HDRC meets on the first and third Wednesdays, a Friday application deadline to a Wednesday decision takes 18 calendar days, and the Office of Historic Preservation reports that over 95% of requests are approved [81]. In September 2024 the commission's standard stipulation required all mechanical equipment to be screened from view from the right of way [82].
The preliminary plan carries the concept floor plan, the patio layout and the interceptor siting; the design professional's permit set adds the sized plumbing and the certified occupant numbers [74]. Interiors and renders for the conversion sit with commercial interiors and conversions.
Renderings for leasing and design review
Retail renderings answer two audiences: leasing teams and design review. The usual set is 3 to 7 stills covering the storefront, the approach with signage, the pad sites, the customer zone and a dusk exterior, with storefront, signage and dusk carrying the leasing. Design review looks closely at signs: Cleveland requires signage illumination, attachment and color specifications at final review [83]. The renderings are built on the site plan geometry; see 3D rendering services.
Related site plans and guides
Office parks with surplus parking often become retail pads: see office site plans. Small-bay retail and service users overlap with flex space site plans, and a center surrounded by new rooftops often starts as part of a single-family and townhome subdivision. For the basics, read what a site plan is.
Frequently asked questions
How deep should an inline strip building be?
About 70 ft is optimal and depth should never exceed 100 ft; 50 to 60 ft suits service tenants [1]. These are practitioner conventions, not code, so the shell is dimensioned to the expected tenant mix.
How many parking spaces per 1,000 SF does a strip center need?
How many cars must a drive-thru stack?
Are drive-thrus being banned?
When does a retail project need a traffic impact study?
Do I need a grease interceptor, and where does it go?
When does stormwater permitting apply?
At 1 acre of disturbance, or less if the site is part of a larger common plan of development, under the federal NPDES Construction General Permit [5].
Sources
- 1)Retail success: the strip center (building depth and bay spacing), An architecture practice (strip center article). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 2)Retail success: the strip center (land-to-building ratio and parking), Greyten. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 3)Designing an Effective Drive-Thru: An Architect's Guide, Part I of III, Quikserv. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 4)Pad sites (definition), Commercial Loan Direct. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 5)Construction General Permit (CGP) Frequent Questions, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 6)Leases and REAs, COREAs and Operating Easements: Considerations in Drafting and Negotiating, American Bar Association. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 7)What is a pad site?, GrowthFactor. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 8)U.S. Shopping-Center Classification and Characteristics, ICSC. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 9)International Building Code, Section 508: mixed use and occupancy (accessory, non-separated and separated occupancies), International Code Council. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 10)Section 903.2.1.2, Group A-2 (model code text), International Code Council. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 11)As More Cities Eliminate Parking Minimums, What Happens Next?, NAIOP Development Magazine, Summer 2023. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 12)Eliminating Parking Mandates to Tackle the Housing Crisis, NAIOP Development Magazine, Fall 2025. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 13)Chicago eliminates parking requirements, unlocks certain density bonuses with new ordinance, Thompson Coburn. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 14)Parking reform symposium, November 18, 2025, UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 15)Parking mandates map, Parking Reform Network. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 16)Bensenville Village Code 10-9-5, parking lot landscaping, Village of Bensenville, Illinois (American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 17)Parking lot canopy standard, Town of Greenburgh, New York. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 18)Provo City Code 15.20.090, parking lot landscaping, Provo City, Utah. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 19)Rocky River Codified Ordinances 1185.09, parking lot landscaping, City of Rocky River, Ohio (American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 20)Defiance Codified Ordinances 1177.07, parking lot landscaping, City of Defiance, Ohio (American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 21)Raleigh UDO Section 7.1.7, Vehicle Parking Lot Landscaping, City of Raleigh, North Carolina. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 22)Prime time for pad sites, ICSC. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 23)Access Management Manual, Chapter 2, Section 3: number, location and spacing of access, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 24)QSR Development Part 2: Developing a Drive-Thru, SimonCRE. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 25)Pembroke Pines Code of Ordinances 155.611, drive-through stacking lanes, City of Pembroke Pines, Florida (American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 26)Olathe Unified Development Ordinance 18.50.040, drive-through facilities, City of Olathe, Kansas. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 27)QSR technology and drive-thru innovation, Capital Rivers. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 28)Understanding the appeal of QSR tenants in NNN investments, Brevitas. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 29)Minneapolis banned drive-thrus. Will more cities follow?, Restaurant Dive. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 30)St. Paul drive-thru restrictions, FOX 9. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 31)Public hearing on banning new drive-through lanes continues Feb. 25 before City Council, MyVillager. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 32)Streets Illustrated: freight design standards, Seattle Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 33)Kentucky Transportation Center research report (WB-50 design vehicle), University of Kentucky. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 34)Loading dock planning and design, Beaton Industrial. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 35)Grease interceptor sizing requirements, Calichi. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 36)Grease interceptor sizing to ensure proper protection of infrastructure, PHCP Pros. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 37)UPC sizing criteria (Table 1014.3.6), UpCodes. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 38)Design Manual M 22-01, Chapter 540: managed access, Washington State Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 39)Access Management Manual, version 2.0, Mississippi Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 40)Access Management Guidebook, Florida Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 41)Project Development and Design Guide, Chapter 15: access management, Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 42)Access Management Manual (September 2022), Alabama Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 43)Traffic impact study guidelines, Baltimore County, Maryland. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 44)Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, Harford County, Maryland. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 45)Traffic impact study FAQs (District 3), Idaho Transportation Department. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 46)Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 47)Traffic impact analysis requirements, City of Mercer Island, Washington. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 48)Construction Stormwater General Permit, Washington State Department of Ecology. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 49)NPDES construction stormwater permits, Georgia Environmental Protection Division. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 50)NPDES Stormwater Construction Permit, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 51)Stormwater construction activities, South Carolina Department of Environmental Services. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 52)New CALGreen requirements for EV charging infrastructure in commercial buildings, BOMA. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 53)EV charging and the 2025 CALGreen code, CalGreen Energy Services. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 54)Restriping Parking Lots: accessible parking requirements (2010 ADA Standards 208.2 and 208.3), U.S. Department of Justice (ADA.gov). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 55)Parking factsheet, ADA National Network. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 56)50-State Survey of Licensed Design Professional Stamping and Sealing Obligations, Baker Donelson. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 57)Bulletin 96-2: sealing of plans, N.J.A.C. 5:23-2.15(f), New Jersey Department of Community Affairs. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 58)Professional seals and signatures, New York State Education Department, Office of the Professions. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 59)Handbook for New Mexico Building Officials (2016), New Mexico State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Professional Surveyors (sblpes.state.nm.us). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 60)Functional obsolescence in appraisal, Madison & Park Appraisal. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 61)U.S. Retail Figures, Q1 2026, CBRE. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 62)National retail report, Q4 2025 (JLL), Commercial Observer. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 63)Cost per square foot of commercial construction by region, An architecture and engineering practice (cost article). Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 64)Net lease cap rates, Q1 2026 (The Boulder Group), Investment Grade. Accessed 2026-07-30.
- 65)SeaTac Municipal Code Chapter 15.520, Mixed Use Development Design Standards, City of SeaTac, Washington (codepublishing.com). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 66)Commercial Zoning Summary (illustrative), Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 67)Zoning Resolution Section 37-34, minimum transparency requirements, New York City Department of City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 68)Airway Heights Municipal Code Chapter 17.10, Commercial Zones, City of Airway Heights, Washington (codepublishing.com). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 69)Legislative Update, August 29, 2025, Number 33 (SB 840), Texas Municipal League. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 70)SB 840, enrolled version (SB00840F): Local Government Code Sec. 218.002, Texas Legislature (capitol.texas.gov). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 71)ESSB 5184 as passed by the Legislature (5184-S.PL), Washington State Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 72)City of Alexandria Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Off-Street Parking and Loading (official text via Municode), City of Alexandria, Virginia. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 73)Clayton County Zoning Ordinance Sec. 4.71, Parking Standards (official text via Municode), Clayton County, Georgia. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 74)Chapter 10, Building-Related Codes (effective May 1, 2025), City of San Antonio Development Services Department. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 75)Ordinance 2025-01-30-0075 (2024 code adoption), City of San Antonio. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 76)Examples of Uses Permitted (updated 08/20/21), City of San Antonio Development Services Department. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 77)FOG Ordinance 2011-05-12-0378 (City Code Ch. 34, Secs. 34-526 to 34-531), San Antonio Water System. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 78)Sidewalk Cafe Permit, City of San Antonio Center City Development and Operations. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 79)Sidewalk Cafe General Application, City of San Antonio Center City Development and Operations. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 80)Information Bulletin 168, TABC and distance variances (rev. Oct 1, 2026), City of San Antonio Development Services Department. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 81)Historic and Design Review Commission (HDRC) page, City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 82)Historic and Design Review Commission meeting minutes, September 4, 2024, City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 83)Design Review Checklist 2023, City of Cleveland City Planning Commission. Accessed 2026-10-07.