What an IOS site plan carries
Industrial outdoor storage (IOS) is a yard business. The site holds trucks, trailers, containers or equipment on a surfaced lot behind a screen, with a gated entry and usually a small office or flex building. A preliminary site plan for it decides how many stalls of each kind fit once the screen, the setbacks, the surface rule and the retention area have taken their share, and it records that count in a site data table a reviewer can check. Truck circulation and fire access for the wider class are set out on the industrial site plans page; this page is about the yard.
Recorded IOS programs show what the sheet has to hold:
| Record | Program | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Henrico County, Virginia, REZ-2025-102340 | 4 tractor-trailer spaces at 12 ft by 50 ft plus 12 regular spaces; heavy equipment and trailers about 14 ft tall; an 8 ft wooden fence; proffer caps of 1,515 SF of office and 3,711 SF of storage, service and repair | [1] |
| A California commercial truck parking facility (CEQA document) | An existing 1,200 SF office with 58 tractor-trailer spaces on existing asphalt and 13 gravel employee spaces | [6] |
| Casa Grande, Arizona, DSA-22-00148 | A warehouse and storage yard for dust control materials on a 6.2-acre site in the Central Arizona Commerce Park, entered by a gated drive, with a scale that weighs trucks coming in and going out | [7] |
| Goodyear, Arizona, Bullard Avenue and El Sol | Truck parking on a 5.6-acre area near Phoenix-Goodyear Airport, reported as approved by the Goodyear Planning and Development Commission in May 2024 | [8] |
The rows that carry the weight on an IOS site data table follow from those records:
- Stall counts by type, tractor-trailer against regular, with the stall module drawn to dimension, as in Henrico's 12 ft by 50 ft trailer spaces [1].
- Building area against any cap, as in Henrico's proffer caps on office space and on storage, service and repair space [1].
- Screen type and height on each frontage, and the height of what is stored behind it [1, 2].
- Surface by area: concrete, asphalt, sealed recycled asphalt or an all-weather material [7, 9, 10].
- Disturbed area, which sets the dust permit and the construction stormwater permit [3, 11].
- Retention area, held as reserved land on the first sheet [12].
The Buckeye model project tests a 5 to 15 acre yard with a small office against the West Valley rules, and the Pinal County model project tests an outdoor storage yard against unincorporated Pinal County and Casa Grande. Both are model projects, used to show how published rules shape a yard layout.
Screens and storage height
Codes set the screen in different terms: a height, an opacity, a material, or a ceiling on what may be stored behind it.
| Jurisdiction | Screen rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Howell, Michigan (Zoning 5.13(c)) | An 8 ft fence, or evergreens at 80 percent opacity | [13] |
| Henrico County, Virginia | An 8 ft wooden fence around the equipment and trailer yard | [1] |
| Grand Prairie, Texas (UDC 10.4.3, 10.5.1) | A Type 3 screening fence for outside storage | [9] |
| Mentor, Ohio (1161.04(h)) | Industrial outdoor storage fully screened, enclosed and gated | [14] |
| Pinal County, Arizona (PCDSC 2.185) | Stored items totally screened from view by a solid wall, a nontransparent fence, landscaping or a combination, no taller than 6 ft | [15] |
| Casa Grande, Arizona (CGMC 17.58.030) | Stored materials kept inside a fully opaque wall or fence at least 6 ft tall | [16] |
| Buckeye, Arizona, Apache-Rainbow Employment Overlay | Walls between the building and the street held to 6 ft, with up to 2 ft more allowed to screen outdoor storage; side and rear walls held to 8 ft, with taller walls in industrial districts where the Zoning Administrator finds them needed; stored material no higher than the screen wall | [2] |
| Goodyear, Arizona (accessory outdoor storage) | Storage only inside an area enclosed and screened from view by a solid masonry wall on all sides, with nothing stored taller than the wall | [17] |
Pinal County and Buckeye's overlay put a ceiling on wall height, while Casa Grande sets a floor; Buckeye's overlay and Goodyear also put a ceiling on what the yard may hold, because nothing stored may rise above the wall [2, 15, 16, 17]. Freeway frontage adds a test of its own. In a 2024 Maricopa County case near Buckeye, the City of Buckeye opposed the request and said it "prefers a solid wall be placed along the freeway to screen the property so those traveling along the freeway don't see the outdoor storage use" [12].
Surface: paved, sealed or all-weather
Surface rules run from concrete on every driven and stored surface to sealed recycled asphalt where a yard is not paved, and recorded yards mix materials by area.
| Jurisdiction or record | Surface rule or recorded surface | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prairie, Texas (UDC 10.4.3, 10.5.1) | Concrete for drive approaches, driveways, fire lanes, parking and storage surfaces | [9] |
| Howell, Michigan (5.13(f)) | A paved hard surface, curbed for spill containment | [13] |
| Maricopa County, Arizona (Z2024046, a semi-trailer and RV storage case heard August 21, 2024) | Unless paved, driveways and storage areas surfaced with at least four-inch sealed recycled asphalt, with a quarter inch of gravel for dust control | [10] |
| Casa Grande, Arizona (DSA-22-00148 applicant narrative) | The yard behind the fence to be coated in an all-weather material; parking and the entry drive to be paved with asphalt | [7] |
| California truck parking facility (CEQA document) | Tractor-trailer spaces on existing asphalt; employee spaces on gravel | [6] |
The environmental case against bare ground is on the record. Henrico County staff, reviewing a yard for heavy equipment and trailers, wrote that unpaved storage lets engine leakage "be absorbed into the ground rather than captured" [1], and the rezoning was contested on screening, gravel and environmental grounds [1]. Howell adds a time limit that changes what a yard can be used for: a semi-trailer may not serve as storage for more than 7 consecutive days, except at freight or truck yards [13].
Lot and site standards
| Jurisdiction | Standard | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear, Arizona, I-2 district | 5 acre minimum site area, 300 ft lot width, 400 ft lot depth, 50 percent maximum building coverage, 50 ft height, 30 ft front setback | [17] |
| Ramsey, Minnesota, I-1 district | Minimum lot size for outdoor storage cut from 5 acres to 1 acre, on a 6-1 second reading | [18] |
| Buckeye, Arizona, Apache-Rainbow Employment Overlay | Arterial landscape buffer of up to 150 ft; storage and parking may move 75 ft into it behind an architectural screen wall at least 6 ft tall; a 50 ft minimum on Watson Road; as little as 20 ft with preferred wall materials | [2] |
| Buckeye overlay, walls and utilities | No unarticulated wall run over 200 ft facing an arterial or highway, or over 100 ft facing other streets, with offsets of at least 2 ft; chain-link only for industrial uses out of view of freeways, arterial and collector streets; utilities underground, including electric lines under 69kV | [2] |
The site data table carries buffer area and wall length beside yard area, because both come straight out of the stall count.
Where the yard is allowed
In the codes below, IOS is an industrial-district use, and the approval path changes with the district.
| Jurisdiction | District rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Howell, Michigan | Outdoor storage of commercial equipment and vehicles only in I-1 and I-2 | [13] |
| Pella, Iowa (165.28) | Outdoor storage prohibited except in M1 and M2 and listed incidental cases, and screened under 165.31 | [19] |
| Ramsey, Minnesota | Outdoor storage in I-1, on a 1 acre minimum lot after the July 28 second reading | [18] |
| Buckeye, Arizona | I-2 Heavy Industrial is written for heavy industry that may bring very heavy truck traffic for supplies, storage or shipping, or outdoor storage and operations; I-1 Light Industrial expects every operation inside an enclosed building, so a yard on I-1 land is unlikely without a rezoning; a PAD is an alternative | [2] |
| Pinal County, Arizona | Districts CI-B, CI-1 and CI-2; uses listed for CI-2 need an Industrial Use Permit from the Board of Supervisors, which can run concurrently with a rezoning; outdoor storage is accessory and is not allowed until a primary use is established | [20, 15] |
| Maricopa County, Arizona | County rezonings to IND-2 with an IUPD overlay; on MCP2023010 the overlay limits the site to an outdoor storage facility, a billboard and a single-family residence until public water and sewer serve it | [21, 22] |
| Henrico County, Virginia | A rezoning with proffers, including caps on office and on storage, service and repair space | [1] |
Two of these codes are changing, which matters in diligence. Buckeye adopted the first phase of its Development Code update on February 20, 2024 and the second on October 21, 2025, so a yard plan there is drawn to the code as amended in October 2025 [23]. Pinal County stepped back from a full rewrite: a county notice of February 5, 2025 cancelled the draft under case PZ-C-004-24, and the code is now being updated in segments, with Hillside, Sign and Parking scheduled for 2026 [24].
Approval paths, and where an unsealed concept plan goes
The recorded paths for an IOS yard, and what the plan does at each:
| Path | Record | What the concept plan does | Seal status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rezoning to an industrial district | Buckeye rezoning conditions, PLZZ-20-00011 | The exhibit is titled "Conceptual Overall Site Plan" and carries the note "Site plan/plat has not been reviewed or approved" [25] | The legal description and exhibit are signed and sealed by an Arizona registrant [25] |
| County rezoning with an IUPD overlay | Maricopa County zoning cases | Engineering review at this stage "is for conceptual design only" [12] | Detailed grading and drainage plans come with the building permit application [12] |
| Industrial Use Permit | Pinal County, uses listed for CI-2 | The application includes a plan for developing the land; the Commission recommends, the Board of Supervisors decides, and copies go to the county engineer, the health department and the air quality district [20] | Not stated |
| Overlay administrative review | Buckeye's Apache-Rainbow Employment and Airport overlays | A conceptual site plan, a landscape plan and building elevations go to administrative review [2] | Not stated |
| Major Site Plan | Casa Grande, DSA-22-00148 | The warehouse and yard were on the June 8, 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission agenda as a Major Site Plan [7] | Not stated |
| Rezoning with proffers | Henrico County, REZ-2025-102340 | The program is fixed by proffer caps on office and on storage, service and repair area [1] | Not stated |
Arizona's city path changed at the end of 2025. A.R.S. 9-500.49, as amended by HB 2447 (Laws 2025, Ch. 31), requires cities to authorize staff approval of site plans and plats without a public hearing, effective from and after December 31, 2025 [26]. The state seal rule is what lets the concept plan circulate before engineering: a registrant seals documents submitted to a regulatory or review body unless the document is marked "preliminary," "draft," or "not for construction" (A.A.C. R4-30-304(D)) [4]. The guide to where unsealed site plans are accepted sets that rule beside other states, and preliminary versus final site plans walks the handoff from concept to permit set.
Arizona rules for an IOS yard
Arizona is the state where the yard rules above sit under a documented state and county layer.
| Layer | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Seals | A.A.C. R4-30-304(A) puts the seal and signature on each drawing sheet, specification cover, report and letter; R4-30-304(D) exempts documents marked preliminary, draft or not for construction | [4] |
| Construction stormwater | AZPDES CGP AZG2025-001, effective August 29, 2025 and expiring August 28, 2030, covers construction disturbing 1 or more acres, or part of a common plan, with a discharge to a water of the United States or an MS4; a new NOI and fee are required | [11] |
| ADEQ fees (FY27) | $527.93 for the NOI on more than 1 to 50 acres and $1,509.75 for SWPPP review, with annual fees until a notice of termination; a No Discharge Certificate carries no fee | [27, 28, 11] |
| Dust, Maricopa County | A Rule 310 permit from 0.10 acre (4,356 sq ft) disturbed, and a trackout control device at 2 or more acres disturbed or 100 or more cubic yards hauled per day; the permit takes effect once the fee is paid and the dust control plan approved, and is valid for one year | [3, 29] |
| Dust, Pinal County | A Site Permit Application, Site Plan and Site Dust Control Plan for development activity of 0.1 acre or more; separate applications in the West Pinal and Apache Junction nonattainment areas, with daily self-inspection logs and certified construction employee lists in West Pinal; a phased closure plan form for close-out | [30, 31] |
| Air quality status | The EPA Green Book lists the Phoenix planning area of Maricopa and Pinal Counties as a Serious PM-10 nonattainment area; ADEQ records its moderate designation on November 15, 1990 and its reclassification to serious on June 10, 1996; whether a given parcel lies inside the boundary is checked against the MAG boundary map | [32, 33] |
| Military airports | Land in the territory in the vicinity of a military airport (A.R.S. 28-8481) may need a Military Compatibility Permit in unincorporated areas, with noise attenuation under A.R.S. 28-8482(B) | [12] |
| State highway access | An ADOT encroachment permit from the district office for a driveway or any work in state right-of-way | [34] |
| Retention, unincorporated Maricopa County | The 100-year, 2-hour storm retained with 1 ft of freeboard for developed portions; no freeboard for basins 1 ft deep or less; retention required for parking areas | [12] |
Outside Arizona, the rules on this page are city and county code, and the yard standard is set locally. Grand Prairie sits in the Dallas-Fort Worth metro, and the Texas page covers the state layer there; the Arizona combination page, industrial outdoor storage site plans in Arizona, and the Phoenix metro page carry the West Valley detail.
West Valley and Pinal County records
The Maricopa County records nearest Buckeye show the pattern a yard plan answers there:
- MCP2023010, Krikorian Warehouses. The site "is being used as an outdoor storage yard for shipping containers, semi-trucks, and trailers," and its warehouse was built without a construction permit after the owners bought the property in 2021, with the site operating under violation since 2022 [12]. Its position "within the 65 Ldn area" limited development to what Luke Air Force Base would approve [12]. Staff wrote that the rezoning "will resolve a zoning violation since outdoor storage use is not permitted," and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to conditions 'a' to 'i', 7-0, on October 24, 2024, over the City of Buckeye's opposition [12]. The case then went to a Board of Supervisors hearing on November 20, 2024 [12, 22].
- Z2021137, Envirotech Group. A request to rezone about 11.7 acres at the southwest corner of Campbell Avenue and 355th Avenue from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD, heard September 22, 2022, with staff recommending approval with conditions, the City of Buckeye replying "No Concerns," no public comment for or against, and up to ten full-time employees expected [21]. It is a manufacturing case, so it shows the county's industrial path rather than a pure yard [21].
- Z2020027, Arizona Water Company. A 4.1-acre operations center proposed from Rural-43 to I-1 IUPD at 195th Avenue and Monte Vista Road, with its facilities yard "screened by the 8' high CMU wall"; the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval subject to conditions 'a' to 'h' [35, 36].
- Pinal County, February 20, 2025. The Commission's record on that date runs both ways: 7-0 for PZ-016-24, a 2.84-acre GR to C-3 rezoning for RV and boat storage, and 5-2 against PZ-017-24, a 160-acre GR to I-3 solar rezoning, where the applicant had been asked to consider "a 6' CMU wall around the entire facility" [37]. Outside storage violations drew hearing officer fines of $750 a count in 2024 cases, or $2,250 for three counts [38].
What capital pays for
Capital treats IOS as its own class, and the constraint it prices is zoning. Newmark reported on September 8, 2025 that IOS rents had risen 123 percent since 2020 against 58 percent for bulk warehouse, with vacancy about half that of bulk warehouses, across an estimated 1.4 million acres in the U.S., and with Phoenix, Memphis and Atlanta at the top of the rent growth list [5]. The same report gives the developer's problem in one line: "well-located sites remain scarce due to zoning" [5].
The capital that followed, as reported:
- Alterra Property Group acquired 49 IOS properties in 22 states with a $189 million Blackstone Mortgage Trust loan in February 2025, the deal a broker called the point when "the floodgates opened" (GARP, secondary) [39].
- More than $900 million was committed to IOS in 2025, including Peakstone's $490 million for 51 assets, Realterm's $277 million for 13 properties and a $150 million Barings-Brennan plan (CRE Daily) [40].
- In Phoenix, Steel Peak paid $3.3 million for 2.18 acres with a 6,250 sq ft building at 2142 W. Van Buren St (press release, September 16, 2026) [41], and a Matthews release reports $8,500,000 for 234 E Mohave St [42].
- A Fort Myers brokerage reported in July 2025 that zoning, not land, is the main hurdle in Southwest Florida, with IOS "restricted to heavy industrial zones" and often requiring special approvals (PR Newswire, secondary) [43].
National, marketing-sourced bands from a 2025 RecNation blog give an order of magnitude only: IOS lease rates of $3,500 to $6,500 per acre per month, and land at $80,000 to $100,000+ per acre for urban infill, $50,000 to $80,000 suburban and $20,000 to $50,000 rural [44].
What the engineer of record adds
The preliminary plan sets the layout, the stall counts, the screen line and the site data table, and it is the exhibit a rezoning or use permit is heard on. Buckeye's rezoning records show what goes in with it: a narrative, the conceptual site plan exhibit, a legal description and exhibit sealed by an Arizona registrant, a citizen participation plan and report, site posting and mailed notices, with notices sent at least 15 days before the first public hearing [25, 45]. The engineer of record carries the rest. In unincorporated Maricopa County, detailed grading and drainage plans come with the building permit application, certified topography is required before building permit plans are submitted, and development in FEMA Zone A needs a floodplain use permit, with structures raised to a regulatory flood elevation the engineer determines [12]. The county's conditions say it plainly: "changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design" [12]. In Buckeye, civil, grading, drainage and building plans are sealed by an Arizona-registered engineer or architect, while concept site plans at the zoning stage are not sealed [25]. The dust control plan and the SWPPP behind the ADEQ notice of intent go to their own preparers. Where a jurisdiction requires a sealed site plan, the preliminary plan is the base the engineer of record builds that set on.
For the views that carry a screening case, see flex and industrial rendering. The blog's IOS development guide covers the asset at more length, the IOS site plan guide walks the layout step by step, and related storage products have their own pages: RV and boat storage, boat storage, self storage and warehouses.
Frequently asked questions
What stall size does an IOS yard use for tractor-trailers?
The recorded module is 12 ft by 50 ft: Henrico County's REZ-2025-102340 shows 4 tractor-trailer spaces at that size plus 12 regular spaces [1].
Can an IOS yard be gravel?
How tall can stored items sit behind the screen?
Which zoning districts take an IOS yard?
When does an Arizona yard need a dust permit?
Can an IOS concept plan go to an Arizona review body unsealed?
How has IOS performed against warehouses?
Newmark reported IOS rents up 123 percent since 2020, against 58 percent for bulk warehouse, with vacancy about half that of bulk warehouses [5].
Sources
- 1)REZ-2025-102340, DRB III Trucking LLC, staff report, Henrico County, Virginia, Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 2)Buckeye Development Code, Article 2, zoning districts and overlay districts (as amended by Ord. No. 28-25), official code text read through a third-party code mirror, City of Buckeye, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 3)Rule 310 Stationary Dust Control Plan, Maricopa County Air Quality Department. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 4)A.A.C. R4-30-304, Use of Seals, Arizona State Board of Technical Registration. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 5)Lots to Gain: Industrial Outdoor Storage is Outperforming Bulk Warehouse, Newmark. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 6)Department of Planning and Community Development, environmental document for a commercial truck parking facility, State of California CEQA database (CEQAnet). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 7)Planning and Zoning Commission agenda packet, June 8, 2023 (DSA-22-00148, Desert Mountain Corporation), City of Casa Grande, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 8)Semi-truck parking campus coming to Goodyear, Rose Law Group Reporter. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 9)City communication, meeting date June 23, 2026 (UDC Sections 10.4.3 and 10.5.1), City of Grand Prairie, Texas. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 10)Z2024046 conditions, Board of Supervisors hearing Aug. 21, 2024, Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 11)AZPDES Construction Activity General Permit (CGP) for Stormwater, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 12)Planning and Zoning Commission minutes, Oct. 24, 2024, Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 13)Howell Zoning Section 5.13, Outdoor Storage of Commercial/Industrial Equipment and Vehicles, City of Howell, Michigan (via American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 14)Mentor Codified Ordinances 1161.04, Outdoor storage, display and temporary event regulations, City of Mentor, Ohio (via American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 15)PCDSC 2.185, Outdoor Storage and Parking Guidelines, Pinal County, Arizona, Code Compliance. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 16)Casa Grande Municipal Code 17.58.030, Storage and exterior display requirements, City of Casa Grande, Arizona (via American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 17)Rezone from I-1 to I-1 with PAD Overlay, project narrative (Goodyear Zoning Ordinance standards reproduced), City of Goodyear, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 18)Ramsey lowers outdoor-storage threshold for industrial properties, ABC Newspapers. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 19)Pella Code 165.28, Supplemental use regulations, outdoor storage outside of the industrial zoning districts, City of Pella, Iowa (via American Legal Publishing). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 20)Pinal County Development Services Code, Chapter 2.110, CI-2 Industrial Zone, Pinal County, Arizona (via Municode). Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 21)Z2021137, Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission (Envirotech Group), Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 22)MCP2023010 (Krikorian Warehouses), conditions of approval, Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 23)General Plan and Development Code (update history), City of Buckeye, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 24)Development Services Code Update, Pinal County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 25)Planning and Zoning Commission packet, PLZZ-20-00011 rezoning conditions, City of Buckeye, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 26)A.R.S. 9-500.49 as amended by HB 2447 (Laws 2025, Ch. 31), chaptered text (azleg.gov), Arizona State Legislature.
- 27)Surface Water General Permit Fees, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 28)Construction General Permit, frequently asked questions, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 29)Dust Control Field Guide for the Construction Industry, Rule 310, Maricopa County Air Quality Department. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 30)Dust, Pinal County Air Quality Control District. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 31)Air quality forms, Pinal County Air Quality Control District. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 32)Green Book, nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants (www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- 33)Phoenix PM-10 nonattainment area (azdeq.gov/phoenix-pm-10-nonattainment-area), Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.
- 34)Encroachment Permits, Arizona Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 35)Case Z2020027, Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission, Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 36)Z2020027, Report to the Board of Supervisors, December 9, 2020, Maricopa County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 37)Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission minutes, Feb. 20, 2025, Pinal County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 38)Zoning and Building Safety hearing minutes, Pinal County, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 39)Industrial Outdoor Storage: Institutions Move In on an Asset Class, GARP. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 40)Industrial rents stabilize amid outdoor storage investment surge, CRE Daily. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 41)Steel Peak Acquires First Industrial Outdoor Storage (IOS) Property in Phoenix, Real Estate Daily News. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 42)Matthews Executes Phoenix IOS Acquisition to Support Owner-User Growth, Matthews Real Estate Investment Services. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 43)Zoning Roadblocks Limit Growth of Industrial Outdoor Storage in Southwest Florida, Says Mayhugh Commercial Realty, PR Newswire (via StreetInsider). Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 44)How Much Does It Cost to Develop an Industrial Outdoor Storage Site?, RecNation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 45)Planning and Zoning Commission packet, PLZZ-21-00016 (citizen participation), City of Buckeye, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-10.
