Site plans / Mixed-use

Mixed-use site plans

A mixed-use site plan is drawn by four rule sets: what the ground floor must hold, how the uses share parking, how a podium separates from the floors above, and what state law now allows by right. This page sets out each with the published numbers, then the approval path and what the engineer of record adds.

Last reviewed

Ground-floor commercial depth (SeaTac; Seattle NC zones)
30 ft average, 15 ft minimum [1, 2]
Ground-floor transparency (New York City, ZR 37-34)
50% between 2 and 12 ft [3]
Shared parking rule
Sum each time period; the highest column is the requirement [4, 5]
Podium separation (IBC 510.2, 2024)
3-hour horizontal assembly over a Type IA base [6]
Texas "mixed-use residential" (SB 840)
At least 65% of square footage residential [7]
urban infill apartments
Representative image

What a mixed-use site plan has to fit

A mixed-use site plan stacks two or more programs on one parcel and makes them share it: housing or offices above, shops, restaurants or services at grade, a parking supply that serves both, a service and loading side, open space, and a fire apparatus lane along the tall face. Most of the decisions the plan records are set by four published rule sets, and each one is a number a reviewer can check.

The ground floor comes first. SeaTac, Washington requires at least 50% of the street-facing ground floor length, excluding vehicle entrances, to be designed for retail, commercial or service use [1]. That sets how much of the frontage the residential lobby, the garage entrance and the service door can take. In Texas the rule runs the other way for the cities SB 840 covers (see the state table below), and a project counts as "mixed-use residential" when at least 65% of its square footage is residential [7].

The preliminary site plan carries these in its site data table: gross floor area by use and by floor, the ground-floor frontage share and depth, units by type, parking required for each use against the shared-parking requirement, the loading and service area, open space, and the aerial fire lane drawn to scale. Engineering stays with the client's engineer of record.

Ground floor: frontage, depth, height and transparency

JurisdictionFrontage and depthHeightTransparencyCode
SeaTac, WAAt least 50% of street-facing ground floor length for retail, commercial or service use; 30 ft average depth, 15 ft minimumNot statedNot statedSeaTac 15.520.200(A), (B) [1]
Seattle, WA (NC zones)30 ft average, 15 ft minimum depth for non-residential space over 600 SF13 ft minimum60% between 2 and 8 ftSDCI commercial zoning summary, illustrative [2]
New York CityMinimum qualifying depth (ZR 37-32); 30 ft on designated commercial streets (ZR 132)Not stated50% between 2 and 12 ft; no blank segment over 10 ftZR 37-32, 37-34, 32-321 [3, 8, 9]
Airway Heights, WANot statedNot stated50% within 20 ft of an arterial; 30% within 60 ftAHMC 17.10.030 [10]

The depth rule shapes the building section as much as the plan. The residential lobby, the elevator core and the parking entrance are planned around a commercial band that averages 30 ft deep along the street, and 15 ft is the shallowest point the rule allows [1, 2]. Seattle publishes its numbers in a summary it marks as illustrative only, so the Land Use Code itself is read for a live site [2]. For storefront planning on the retail side, see retail center site plans.

mixed-use office podium
Representative rendering

Shared parking: the four published tables

Every shared parking table below uses the same arithmetic: multiply each use's required spaces by the percentage for each time period, sum each column, and take the highest column as the requirement [4, 5]. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking, 3rd Edition (Mary S. Smith, March 2020) is the accepted methodology behind such tables: it starts from each use's stand-alone peak demand, applies hourly presence factors from 6am to midnight, then applies non-auto and captive-market adjustments, and jurisdictions accept it as a starting point, frequently through proffers that require the shared supply to be re-checked over time [11].

UseBaltimore (weekday midnight to 7am / 7am to 6pm / 6pm to midnight)Alexandria, VA (weekday day / weekday evening / weekend day / weekend evening)Clayton County, GA (weekday day / evening / weekend day / evening)Lynnwood, WA (weekday day / evening / night)
Residential100 / 55 / 8560 / 100 / 90 / 10080 / 100 / 80 / 10060 / 100 / 100 [12, 4, 5, 13]
Office5 / 100 / 5100 / 5 / 5 / 5100 / 10 / 20 / 5100 / 20 / 5 [12, 4, 5, 13]
Hotel100 / 50 / 9080 / 100 / 80 / 10060 / 100 / 60 / 10070 / 100 / 100 [12, 4, 5, 13]
Retail or commercialNot stated60 / 90 / 100 / 7095 / 85 / 100 / 7090 / 80 / 5 [4, 5, 13]
RestaurantNot stated50 / 80 / 80 / 10075 / 100 / 60 / 100Not stated [4, 5]

Percentages of each use's stand-alone requirement, by time period [12, 4, 5, 13].

The tables reward pairings whose peaks fall at different hours. Baltimore counts office at 5% overnight and in the evening against residential at 100% overnight and 85% in the evening [12]; Clayton County counts retail at 95% on weekday days but restaurants at 100% on weekday and weekend evenings [5]. Lynnwood keeps reserved hotel and residential spaces out of the sharing and allows a 500-ft captive-market reduction [13].

Codes also cap what staff can approve administratively:

JurisdictionAdministrative limitSource
Phoenix, AZTraffic engineer may grant up to a 15% reduction under the city's shared parking model (ZO 702)[14]
Clayton County, GAZoning Administrator may approve up to 25% with inter-parcel access (Sec. 4.71)[5]
Hamilton Township, OHShared parking capped at 50% of required spaces; a recorded agreement is required before a zoning certificate issues (Ch. 7)[15]

The minimums those tables reduce are themselves falling. NAIOP, citing the Parking Reform Network, counted more than 3,700 cities in 22 countries that had reduced or eliminated parking requirements as of August 2025, with over 100 removing all minimums [16]. The UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies put it this way in November 2025: "more than 100 U.S. cities have eliminated any requirements to provide a minimum number of parking spaces from their zoning code, with hundreds more lifting their parking requirements in key areas like commercial corridors and historic downtowns" [17]. The Parking Reform Network estimates roughly 20 percent of over 3,000 examined codes have abolished or reduced mandates citywide [18].

Where the uses sit on separate parcels, the sharing is recorded. Reciprocal easement agreements are recorded instruments that "set the terms, conditions, and obligations for the easements, restrictions, and covenants between owners" [19], and Hamilton Township's code requires a recorded shared parking agreement before a zoning certificate issues [15]. TxDOT allows lesser driveway spacing than its corner-clearance criteria only where shared access is established with an abutting property [20], so the plan shows cross-access to the neighbor even before the neighbor builds.

Podium, height and the fire lane

IBC 510.2 (2024) treats the podium and the building above as separate buildings for area, stories and construction type when the horizontal assembly is 3-hour rated, the building below is Type IA, shaft and stair enclosures through it are rated 2 hours (with a 3-hour-below, 1-hour-above exception), and the building above contains Group A, B, M, R or S occupancies [6]. NFPA 13 sprinklers are required below the assembly, NFPA 13R is allowed above where its conditions are met, and height is measured from grade plane in current editions [21].

That last point decides the site plan. The podium can cover the whole lot, but because height is measured from grade plane, the overall height still triggers IFC D105 aerial access [21, 22]. The 26 ft aerial lane is therefore usually the street or a fire lane along one long face. Where Appendix D is adopted, an aerial road is required once the highest roof surface is more than 30 ft above grade plane; it is at least 26 ft wide, sits 15 to 30 ft from the building parallel to one entire side, and no overhead utility lines may run over it or between it and the building [22].

Land value, not preference, decides between surface parking and a structure. As market evidence, surface stalls run roughly $3,000 to $8,000 per space and consume 300 to 400 SF each including drive aisles, above-grade garages run $18,000 to $35,000 per space, and underground parking runs $25,000 to $50,000 [23]. For the residential side of the stack, see multifamily site plans.

State laws that change the mixed-use program

These states have primary-source rules that change what a mixed-use plan must hold. Elsewhere the mix, the parking and the ground-floor rule are set locally.

StateLawEffect on the site planSource
TexasSB 840, effective September 1, 2025No required nonresidential use for a multifamily project in a mixed-use zone; "mixed-use residential" is at least 65% residential by square footage; office, retail or warehouse buildings at least five years old may convert to residential or mixed-use residential by right; no zoning change or variance may be required for qualifying projects[24, 7, 25]
Texas, scopeLocal Government Code Sec. 218.002 (SB 840)Applies only to a municipality of more than 150,000 wholly or partly in a county of more than 300,000[26]
Texas, density and heightSB 84036 units per acre minimum, higher where the city allows more; the greater of 45 ft or the commercial height limit (secondary summaries; the House Research Organization digest confirms the density limit)[27, 28, 29]
FloridaFla. Stat. 166.04151(7) (Live Local), amended by SB 1730 (2025)Multifamily and mixed-use residential allowed in commercial, industrial and mixed-use zones if at least 40% of rental units stay affordable for 30 years; administrative approval; required parking reduction of 15%; parking eliminated for mixed-use residential in a transit-oriented development area[30, 31, 32]
WashingtonESSB 5184 (2025)No parking minimum for ground-level commercial in mixed-use buildings or commercial spaces under 3,000 SF; caps of 2 per 1,000 SF of commercial and 0.5 spaces per multifamily unit; Renton reports a January 2027 code update deadline[33, 34, 35]
CaliforniaGov. Code 65863.2 (AB 2097), effective January 1, 2023No minimum parking within one-half mile of a major transit stop; findings to impose parking made in writing within 30 days; EV-charging and accessible-space requirements still apply; Los Angeles' implementation excludes hotels, motels and other transient lodging[36, 37, 38]
ColoradoHB24-1304Bars residential parking minimums in transit areas by 6/30/2025[39]

Two effects reach the drawing. In Texas, a multifamily project in a mixed-use zone can drop the ground-floor commercial a city once required [24]; in Washington, the ground-floor commercial can be planned with no required parking of its own [33]. In California, a hotel component in a mixed-use project near transit still takes its local parking ratio, because the transit-area relief does not reach transient lodging in Los Angeles [38].

Approval path patterns

PathExampleDiscretionWhat the plan carriesSource
Administrative by rightFlorida Live Local (Fort Myers Beach; Oakland Park)None if standards are metA written analysis of which 166.04151(7) provisions apply, which local rules are claimed preempted, and the basis for any parking reduction; local design, stormwater and landscaping standards still apply[40, 41]
By right under SB 840Texas cities in scopeNone for qualifying projectsNo zoning change or variance may be required[24]
Rezoning despite a by-right optionAustin, C14-2025-0089HighA negotiated rezoning in place of the by-right route[42]
Concept meeting before formal submittalMurfreesboro, Tennessee due diligence meetingStaff reviewA dimensioned conceptual site plan with a site data table[43]

Oakland Park says qualifying Live Local projects must be approved "without discretionary review by boards or commissions" [41]. By-right status does not always end the negotiation: the American Enterprise Institute documents an Austin applicant who pursued a negotiated rezoning (C14-2025-0089) instead of the SB 840 route [42]. Staff reports on re-planned office land record the opposition themes such a rezoning meets: traffic, school capacity, neighborhood character and building height, and municipal tax-base loss [44].

The concept stage is where an unsealed plan is asked for. Murfreesboro's due diligence meeting text reads: "A dimensioned conceptual site plan is required depicting all proposed and existing structures, vehicle and pedestrian access, parking, landscaping, potential drainage area(s) and a site data table" [43]. A due diligence meeting must be held before a pre-application meeting can be requested, and plans at the pre-application meeting should be "90-95% complete" [43]. Tennessee's board rule requires working or partially completed plans, and drawings that are not construction documents, to be designated preliminary, not for construction, for review only or draft (Rule 0120-02-.08(9)) [45]. See preliminary vs final site plans and where unsealed site plans are accepted.

One district's numbers: Murfreesboro's MU district

Murfreesboro, Tennessee has had a mixed-use (MU) district since a 2013 ordinance, and its Chart 2 standards show what a district table does to a mixed-use parcel. The values below are from the Chart 2 edition updated August 31, 2017; Chart 2 and its endnotes were amended by Ord. 26-O-13, passed May 21, 2026, so they are rechecked at due diligence [46, 47].

MU standard (2017 Chart 2 edition)ValueSource
Minimum lot areaNone (2017)[46]
Minimum lot width100 ft; 200 ft on an arterial or collector (2017)[46]
Front yard15 ft; 50 ft on an arterial or collector (2017; first set by the 2013 MU ordinance)[46, 48]
Side yard10 ft; next to single-family, 20 ft plus 10 ft per story over two (2017)[46]
Rear yard20 ft; next to single-family, 20 ft plus 10 ft per story over two (2017)[46]
Maximum height150 ft for commercial uses (2017)[46]

Next to single-family land, a 4-story MU building takes a 40 ft rear yard under the 2017 endnote [46]. On an arterial or collector, the 2013 ordinance reads: "The minimum front yard set forth on Chart 2 shall be required unless the property abuts a major arterial, minor arterial, or collector street identified as such by the Murfreesboro Major Thoroughfare Plan as ... minimum front yard shall be 50 feet" [48]. On those frontages the building steps back and the front of the lot goes to parking and landscape. The state layer is on Tennessee site plans, and Murfreesboro sits in the Nashville metro.

Where mixed-use sites come from

Many mixed-use sites are re-plans of something else. In Johns Creek, Georgia, the State Farm campus (500,000 SF of office) was demolished for the $560M Medley mixed-use project, developed by Toro Development [49]. In Texas, SB 840 gives owners of office, retail or warehouse buildings at least five years old a by-right path to residential or mixed-use residential [24]. The office side of that story is on office site plans, and the Atlanta metro page carries the regional context.

What the preliminary plan carries, and what the engineer of record adds

ItemPreliminary site planEngineer or architect of record
Ground-floor frontage share and depthDrawn and tabulated against the district rule (SeaTac 50%; 30 ft average, 15 ft minimum) [1]Architect confirms the storefront and structure
Shared parkingRequired spaces by use and the highest time-period total [4, 5]A shared parking study where a reduction is sought; recorded agreement where a code requires one [11, 15]
Podium separationMassing, parking levels and stories3-hour horizontal assembly over a Type IA base, 2-hour shafts (IBC 510.2) [6]
Aerial fire laneDrawn along one long face, 15 to 30 ft off the building [22]Fire access plan confirmed with the fire code official
Building plansNoSealed by the architect or engineer [45]

The general split is in who prepares a site plan and do I need an architect for a site plan.

Mixed-use programs overlap with hotel site plans where a hotel shares the parking, with senior living site plans where care units sit over retail, and with apartment rendering for the street views design boards ask to see. The studio's article on mixed-use redevelopment of shopping malls covers the retail-to-mixed-use case.

Frequently asked questions

How deep must ground-floor retail be in a mixed-use building?

Commonly 30 ft on average with a 15 ft minimum: SeaTac, Washington sets that depth in its mixed-use design standards, and Seattle's NC zones apply the same numbers to non-residential space over 600 SF [1, 2].

How is shared parking calculated?

Multiply each use's required spaces by the percentage for each time period, sum each column, and take the highest column as the requirement. Baltimore, Alexandria, Clayton County and Lynnwood all publish tables built this way [4, 5, 12, 13].

Can a Texas city require ground-floor retail in a mixed-use zone?

Not for a multifamily project under SB 840, effective September 1, 2025: cities may no longer require a multifamily project in a mixed-use zone to include nonresidential uses [24]. The law applies only in a city of more than 150,000 people that lies wholly or partly in a county of more than 300,000 [26].

What makes a podium legal?

Under IBC 510.2 (2024), a 3-hour horizontal assembly over a Type IA base, with shaft and stair enclosures through it rated 2 hours and Group A, B, M, R or S occupancies above [6]. NFPA 13 sprinklers are required below the assembly [21].

Does the ground-floor commercial space need parking in Washington?

No minimum may be required. ESSB 5184 (2025) bars parking minimums for ground-level commercial in mixed-use buildings and for commercial spaces under 3,000 SF, and caps commercial requirements at 2 spaces per 1,000 SF [33, 34].

How does Florida's Live Local Act treat mixed-use?

Multifamily and mixed-use residential must be allowed in commercial, industrial and mixed-use zones if at least 40% of the rental units stay affordable for 30 years, with administrative approval [30]. Under SB 1730 (2025) the required parking reduction is 15%, and parking is eliminated for mixed-use residential in a transit-oriented development area [31, 32].

Can I take an unsealed concept plan to the city?

At the concept stage, often yes. Murfreesboro, Tennessee asks for a "dimensioned conceptual site plan" with a site data table at its due diligence meeting [43], and Tennessee's board rule requires drawings that are not construction documents to be designated preliminary, not for construction, for review only or draft [45].

Sources

  1. 1)SeaTac Municipal Code Chapter 15.520, Mixed Use Development Design Standards, City of SeaTac, Washington (codepublishing.com). Accessed 2026-10-10.
  2. 2)Commercial Zoning Summary (illustrative), Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  3. 3)Zoning Resolution Section 37-34, minimum transparency requirements, New York City Department of City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  4. 4)City of Alexandria Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Off-Street Parking and Loading (official text via Municode), City of Alexandria, Virginia. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  5. 5)Clayton County Zoning Ordinance Sec. 4.71, Parking Standards (official text via Municode), Clayton County, Georgia. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  6. 6)2024 International Building Code Section 510.2, Horizontal building separation allowance, International Code Council. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  7. 7)Texas Senate Bill 840: By-Right Multifamily Development Now in Effect, Haynes Boone. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  8. 8)Zoning Resolution of the City of New York (print edition, including Section 37-32), New York City Department of City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  9. 9)Zoning text, Article XIII, Chapter 2, New York City Department of City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  10. 10)Airway Heights Municipal Code Chapter 17.10, Commercial Zones, City of Airway Heights, Washington (codepublishing.com). Accessed 2026-10-10.
  11. 11)Shared Parking, 3rd Edition (Mary S. Smith, March 2020), Urban Land Institute, ICSC and National Parking Association (americas.uli.org). Accessed 2026-07-30.
  12. 12)Baltimore City Zoning Code, Table 16-501, Collective Parking Calculation, City of Baltimore. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  13. 13)Lynnwood Municipal Code 21.18.900, Shared parking, City of Lynnwood, Washington. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  14. 14)Phoenix Zoning Ordinance Section 702, Off-Street Parking and Loading, City of Phoenix. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  15. 15)Zoning Resolution Chapter 7, Parking, Loading and Circulation, Hamilton Township, Ohio. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  16. 16)Eliminating Parking Mandates to Tackle the Housing Crisis (Fall 2025), NAIOP. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  17. 17)Symposium, November 18, 2025, UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  18. 18)Parking Mandates Map, Parking Reform Network. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  19. 19)Leases and REAs, COREAs and Operating Easements: Considerations in Drafting and Negotiating (March/April 2024), American Bar Association. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  20. 20)Access Management Manual, Chapter 2, Section 3: Number, Location and Spacing of Access, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  21. 21)Podium Construction and Fire Protection (August 30, 2023), National Fire Sprinkler Association. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  22. 22)Site Design Requirements for Fire Department Apparatus (IFC Appendix D as adopted), City of Bismarck, ND. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  23. 23)Parking construction cost per space, surface, above-grade and underground (2026), Wins Parking; DBS Group. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  24. 24)Legislative Update, August 29, 2025, Number 33 (SB 840), Texas Municipal League. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  25. 25)SB 840 Goes Into Effect, Limits Municipal Zoning Authority (September 1, 2025), CandysDirt. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  26. 26)SB 840, enrolled version (SB00840F): Local Government Code Sec. 218.002, Texas Legislature (capitol.texas.gov). Accessed 2026-10-10.
  27. 27)TX Senate Bill 840 and Other Land Use Legislation Effective September 1 (secondary summary), Brazos Valley/West Neighborhood Association. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  28. 28)Bill digest, SB 840 (89th Legislature), Texas House Research Organization. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  29. 29)Texas Enacts Critical Real Estate Reforms: Senate Bills 15, 17, 840 (July 2025), Foley and Lardner. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  30. 30)Florida Statutes Section 166.04151 (2025), The Florida Senate. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  31. 31)Final bill analysis h0943z1 (June 26, 2025), Florida House of Representatives. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  32. 32)SB 1730's Bold Overhaul of Land Use for Affordable Housing in Florida, Nelson Mullins. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  33. 33)Washington State Growth Management Program, June 2025: New TOD and parking laws (Washington Department of Commerce), Puget Sound Regional Council. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  34. 34)ESSB 5184 as passed by the Legislature (5184-S.PL), Washington State Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  35. 35)State Law ESSB 5184: Parking Reform, City of Renton, Washington. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  36. 36)AB 2097 memo (October 2023): Gov. Code 65863.2, Los Angeles City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  37. 37)AB-2097 Residential, commercial, or other development types: parking requirements (bill text), California Legislative Information. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  38. 38)Assembly Bill 2097, Los Angeles City Planning. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  39. 39)Parking Minimums (HB24-1304), Colorado Department of Local Affairs. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  40. 40)Florida Live Local Act, Town of Fort Myers Beach, Florida. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  41. 41)Live Local Act, City of Oakland Park, Florida. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  42. 42)Texas (SB 840), American Enterprise Institute. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  43. 43)Current Planning, City of Murfreesboro Planning Department. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  44. 44)Phoenix General Plan Amendment staff report; Rock Island rezoning memos (opposition themes), City of Phoenix; City of Rock Island. Accessed 2026-07-30.
  45. 45)Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0120-02-.08, Seals (Tennessee Board of Architectural and Engineering Examiners rule, via Cornell LII), Cornell Legal Information Institute. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  46. 46)Chart 2, Minimum Setbacks and Lot Requirements (updated August 31, 2017), City of Murfreesboro. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  47. 47)Appendix A: Zoning Ordinance (updated September 3, 2026), City of Murfreesboro. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  48. 48)Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to Create a MU, Mixed Use District (2013), City of Murfreesboro. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  49. 49)State Farm Johns Creek campus redeveloped as the Medley mixed-use project, CommercialSearch (commercialsearch.com). Accessed 2026-07-30.

Start a project

Bring us the site. We draw the first plan.

Send the parcel, the program and anything you already have: a survey, a sketch, a zoning letter. The studio returns a preliminary site plan your engineer of record can build on.

Start a project