Estimate the site rules
How the calculator reads a gas station
The calculator starts from two numbers a fuel site program fixes early: the vehicle fueling positions (VFP), each place where one vehicle can fuel at a time, and the floor area of the convenience store. ITE's 11th Edition bands land use 945, Convenience Store/Gas Station, by store size and fueling position count, and its PM peak rates rise from 18.42 to 26.90 trips per VFP as the store grows [1]. From those two inputs the calculator estimates the PM peak hour trips, compares them with the traffic study triggers of the state and the place, and lists the turn-lane warrants, the state's underground storage tank (UST) program agency, the dispenser separations, the parking rows and the dimensions of the delivery design vehicle you choose. Each figure it shows is read from a row cited to its source. The gas station site plan page shows how those distances shape the layout around the pumps, the store and the canopy.
Trips from fueling positions and store size
The City of Phoenix, Oregon, republishes the 11th Edition PM peak rates for land use 945 in three bands: 18.42 per VFP for a store of 2,000 to 4,000 sf with 8 or fewer VFP, 22.76 for 4,000 to 5,500 sf with 12 to 20 VFP, and 26.90 for 5,500 to 10,000 sf with about 16 VFP [1]. The calculator picks the band by the store size you enter, multiplies its rate by your fueling positions, and labels the result with the edition and the table it comes from [1]. A store of exactly 4,000 or 5,500 sf sits on a limit two bands share as the table writes them, so the calculator shows both estimates and does not choose between them [1]. The fueling position count a band names is shown beside the estimate and never used to pick the band, and a store under 2,000 or over 10,000 sf gets no estimate, because no band in the table covers it [1].
Florida holds the exception in the rows. Palm Beach County requires the FDOT two-variable equation instead of ITE, and prohibits internalization between pumps and store [2]. The county's table gives 12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips, split 50/50, a daily volume of 14.3 x PM trips, and "Use PM" for the AM peak, from an FDOT study the county adopted on 7/25/2022 [2]. Where you choose Palm Beach County, the calculator computes that equation, compares its PM peak figure with the triggers, and shows the ITE band beside it. The Florida site plan page covers the decision clocks and state layers a Florida application meets.
Pass-by changes what a traffic study counts. Phoenix, Oregon applies net-new factors of 0.44, 0.25 and 0.21 by size band [1]. The calculator states those factors with their label and never applies them, because the table, as our research reads it, does not pair each factor with a band. ITE's own pass-by shares for land use 945 are not verified in our research, and neither are its daily and AM peak rates per fueling position.
Traffic studies and turn lanes
Each state's transportation department sets traffic study thresholds for access to its highways, and some cities and counties set their own; the calculator shows the rows of the state you choose and of the place, where our research holds one. Arizona's TGP 240 calls for a traffic impact analysis at 100 or more trips in any one hour, Category I from 100 to under 500 and Category II at 500 or more, and a traffic statement under 100 [3]. Ohio calls for a full TIS above 200 peak-hour trips, a Traffic Analysis at 60 to 200, and a turn-lane warrant submission only at 10 to 59 [4]. Virginia's administrative guidelines set study tiers of 100 to 499 and 500 or more peak-hour trips [5], and 24VAC30-155-40 calls for a rezoning submission at more than 5,000 vehicle trips per day at a state highway connection [6]. Texas has no single statewide trip threshold [7], and the TxDOT Houston District calls for a major study at 150 or more peak-hour or 1,500 or more daily trips [8]. The Texas gas station site plan page covers TxDOT access on frontage roads and state highways.
The calculator compares its PM peak estimate only with a trigger that counts trips in a peak hour or in any one hour, and the county equation's daily figure only with a daily trigger. A trigger that counts new trips is stated and not compared, because the estimate comes before any pass-by reduction. North Carolina's threshold of 3,000 or more daily trips allows no trip reductions when testing it, and below it the District Engineer decides [9].
Turn-lane warrants count turning vehicles at a driveway, which the calculator does not estimate, so it shows them as the rows state them. Georgia sets right-turn lanes by daily site right-turn volume: on a 2-lane road with AADT under 6,000, 200 at 35 mph or less, 150 at 40 to 50 mph and 100 at 55 to 60 mph, and always at 65 mph or more [10]. Colorado's access code sets a deceleration lane at more than 25 vph of right-turn ingress in access category R-A [11]. Arizona's TGP 245 warrants a left-turn lane at 30 vph under 45 mph, or 15 at 45 mph or more, when advancing volume is under 200 [12]. The Georgia gas station site plan page covers the access geometry GDOT fixes on the plan, and the Gwinnett County gas station and c-store case study is a model project on the county's rulebook.
Tanks, dispensers and separations
Underground storage tanks answer to a state agency where EPA has approved the state's program. Under 40 CFR Part 282, an approved program operates in lieu of the federal one, and as of September 2021, 39 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico had approved programs [13]. The calculator names the agency of each state where our research verified it: the TCEQ PST Program under 30 TAC Ch. 334 in Texas [14], the EPD UST Management Program under Ga. Comp. R. and Regs. 391-3-15 in Georgia [15], and the TDEC Division of USTs under Tenn. Comp. R. and Regs. 0400-18-01 in Tennessee [16]. For every other state it says the agency is not verified in our research.
The siting distances start from the model codes. The International Fire Code puts dispensers 10 ft or more from lot lines (IFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1), 10 ft or more from buildings with combustible walls or non-rated noncombustible walls, and 20 ft or more from fixed ignition sources (IFC 2303.1 items 2 and 5), and it places the emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensers (IFC 2303.2) [17, 18]. Those distances bind only where a state or city has adopted them, so the calculator labels them a model standard. Virginia's code, 13VAC5-52-280, sets dispensing at least 10 ft from adjoining buildable lot lines and 5 ft from building openings, prohibits smoking and open flames within 20 ft of dispensers, and puts dispensers within 10 ft of vehicle traffic on a 6 in concrete island or Section 312 protection [17]. New Hampshire applies NFPA 30A as adopted in its 2021 edition: the emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensers, and 75 ft maximum travel to an extinguisher [19].
Local rules sit on top of the model codes, and the calculator shows a county or city row only where it was verified from the code. Prince George's County, Maryland, allows a gas station by special exception under Zoning Sec. 27-358(a), with the nearest pump 300 ft from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence, and 150 ft of frontage on a 70 ft right-of-way [20]. Phoenix's Zoning Ordinance §623 keeps tractor-trailer stacking and loading docks at least 60 ft from residential zoning [21]. The car wash and gas station regulations by state guide sets these rules beside each state's tank program and fire code.
Parking and the delivery truck
Parking codes rarely name a gas station with a convenience store as a use of its own, so the calculator shows a city's rows by the code's own condition. Houston's Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e) sets 3.0 spaces per service stall plus 1.0 per employee on the largest shift for a service station, and the convenience store component is not verified in our research [22]. Tulsa's Table 55-1 sets 1.50 per 1,000 sq ft for a fueling station and 2.50 per 1,000 sq ft for convenience goods retail, with none for the first 5,000 sq ft, under Ord. 25429, effective 12/10/2024 [23]. How Tulsa's two ratios combine is not verified in our research. Milwaukee sets parking for a filling station as required by the board for special use approval [24]. The parking requirements lookup holds the same rows beside other uses and asks the location questions where a city's no-minimum area or a state parking law applies.
The delivery truck sets the turning path at the driveways and around the canopy, but which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses is not verified in our research, so the calculator shows the dimensions of the vehicle you choose and never picks one. TxDOT's Roadway Design Manual Table 4-1 gives the WB-67 interstate semi-trailer a 44.8 ft minimum design turning radius, a 41.0 ft centerline turning radius and a 1.9 ft minimum inside radius [25]. INDOT's Figure 40-4A, the archived 2006 English edition, lists the same vehicle as WB-65, the Indiana Design Vehicle, with an overall length of 73.5 ft, a width of 8.5 ft and a height of 13.5 ft, and gives the SU-30 single-unit truck a length of 30.0 ft [26]. Sites that also fuel tractor-trailers are covered on the truck stop site plan page, and the car wash stacking calculator covers a wash bay added to a fuel site.
The rows in the calculator
124 verified code values, each cited to the code, rule or agency page it comes from, and the reference figures beside them with their labels, as researched on October 11, 2026. A value is stored exactly as its source writes it; the calculator does the arithmetic. No site area appears here: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research.
Underground storage tank program agency by state
| State | Agency as stored | Rule citation | Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | ADEM | Ala. Admin. Code 335-6-15, 335-6-16[27] | |
| Arkansas | Division of Environmental Quality | Not given[28] | |
| Colorado | CDLE Division of Oil and Public Safety | 7 CCR 1101-14[29] | |
| Georgia | EPD UST Management Program | Ga. Comp. R. and Regs. 391-3-15[15] | |
| Indiana | IDEM Office of Land Quality | Not given[30] | |
| Iowa | DNR UST Section | Not given[31] | |
| Kentucky | EEC Division of Waste Management, UST Branch | 401 KAR 42:020[32] | |
| Michigan | LARA Bureau of Fire Services, Storage Tank Division | NREPA Part 211; Michigan UST Rules[33] | |
| Missouri | DNR | RSMo 319.100 to 319.139[34] | |
| Nebraska | State Fire Marshal | Not given[35] | State Fire Marshal for tank permits, registration and inspection; the state environmental agency handles the remedial action fund (agency name per the ST-NE correction) |
| North Carolina | DEQ Division of Waste Management, UST Section | 15A NCAC 02P (fund)[36] | |
| Pennsylvania | DEP | 25 Pa. Code Ch. 245[37] | |
| Rhode Island | DEM | Rules under RIGL 42-17.1, 46-12, 46-13[38] | |
| South Carolina | SC Dept. of Environmental Services | S.C. Code 44-2 (SUPERB); R.61-98[39] | |
| Tennessee | TDEC Division of USTs | Tenn. Comp. R. and Regs. 0400-18-01[16] | |
| Texas | TCEQ PST Program | 30 TAC Ch. 334[14] | |
| Utah | DEQ ERR | Not given[40] | |
| Vermont | DEC | Vermont UST Rules[41] |
The agency of these states is not verified in our research: Alaska; Arizona; California; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Kansas; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Minnesota; Mississippi; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; South Dakota; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.
Dispenser separations and siting rules
The model standard rows come from the International Fire Code and the NFPA motor fuel dispensing standard, as their sources quote them; they bind only where a state or city has adopted them. The state, county and city rows are code.
| Where | Rule | As stored | Condition | Citation | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Dispenser to lot lines | 10 ft or more | IFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1(1)[17] | model standard | |
| United States | Dispenser to buildings with combustible or non-rated walls | 10 ft or more | buildings with combustible walls or non-rated noncombustible walls | IFC 2303.1 item 2[18] | model standard |
| United States | Dispenser to fixed ignition sources | 20 ft or more | fixed ignition sources | IFC 2303.1 item 5[18] | model standard |
| United States | Hose reach to building openings | 5 ft | a fully extended hose must not reach within 5 ft of building openings; vehicle fueled wholly on premises | IFC 2303.1 items 3 and 4[42] | model standard |
| United States | Emergency shutoff from dispensers | 20 ft (minimum) | emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensers | IFC 2303.2[18] | model standard |
| United States | Emergency shutoff from dispensers | 100 ft (maximum) | emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensers | IFC 2303.2[18] | model standard |
| New Hampshire | Emergency shutoff from dispensers | 20 ft (minimum) | emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensers, plus an added device per island group | NFPA 30A §6.7 (2021, as adopted in NH), NFPA 30A 2021[19] | Code |
| New Hampshire | Emergency shutoff from dispensers | 100 ft (maximum) | emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensers | NFPA 30A §6.7 (2021, as adopted in NH), NFPA 30A 2021[19] | Code |
| New Hampshire | Fire extinguisher travel distance | 75 ft maximum travel | NFPA 30A §9.5.2.7 (2021), NFPA 30A 2021[19] | Code | |
| Phoenix, Arizona | Truck stacking and loading docks to residential zoning | 60 ft (minimum) | tractor-trailer stacking and loading docks from residential zoning | Phoenix Zoning Ordinance §623[21] | Code |
| Prince George's County, Maryland | Nearest pump to a lot with a school, playground, library, hospital or residence | 300 ft | nearest pump from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence; gas station special exception | Prince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)[20] | Code |
| Prince George's County, Maryland | Street frontage | 150 ft of frontage | on a 70 ft right-of-way; gas station special exception | Prince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)[20] | Code |
| Virginia | Dispenser to lot lines | 10 ft (minimum) | from adjoining buildable lot lines | 13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)[17] | Code |
| Virginia | Dispenser to building openings | 5 ft (minimum) | from building openings | 13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)[17] | Code |
| Virginia | Smoking and open flames near dispensers | 20 ft | smoking and open flames prohibited within 20 ft of dispensers | IFC 2305.4 (Virginia text)[17] | Code |
| Virginia | Dispenser protection near vehicle traffic | 6 in concrete island | dispensers within 10 ft of vehicle traffic, unless Section 312 protection is provided | 13VAC5-52-280[17] | Code |
| Virginia | Vapor processing equipment to buildings or lot lines | 10 ft | vapor processing equipment from buildings or buildable lot lines | IFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)[17] | Code |
| Virginia | Vapor processing equipment to dispensers | 20 ft | vapor processing equipment from dispensers | IFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)[17] | Code |
Not verified in our research: EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Clarkston, Georgia; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Gwinnett County, Georgia; Drive aisle around pump islands, Gwinnett County, Georgia; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Harper Woods, Michigan; Large stations to schools, homes and other sensitive lots, Montgomery County, Maryland; Dispenser to lot lines, North Carolina; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Oakland, New Jersey; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Rocky Hill, Connecticut; Separation from schools, churches, other stations and homes, Rome, Georgia; Tanks and dispensers to lot lines, Seattle, Washington; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Staunton, Virginia.
Trip rates, the county equation and pass-by
| Rate | Period | As stored | Condition | Edition and source | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITE land use 945, store 2,000 to 4,000 sq ft | PM peak hour | 18.42 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) | LUC 945 band: store 2,000 to 4,000 sf, 8 or fewer VFP | ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1] | published trip rate |
| ITE land use 945, store 4,000 to 5,500 sq ft | PM peak hour | 22.76 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) | LUC 945 band: store 4,000 to 5,500 sf, 12 to 20 VFP | ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1] | published trip rate |
| ITE land use 945, store 5,500 to 10,000 sq ft | PM peak hour | 26.90 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) | LUC 945 band: store 5,500 to 10,000 sf, about 16 VFP | ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1] | published trip rate |
| Equation, Palm Beach County, Florida | PM peak hour | 12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips (VFP = vehicle fueling positions; store ksf = store area in 1,000 sf) | Palm Beach County requires this FDOT two-variable equation instead of ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-store | FDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2] | published trip rate |
| Equation, Palm Beach County, Florida | Daily | 14.3 x PM trips daily trips | Palm Beach County alternative to ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-store | FDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2] | published trip rate |
| Equation, Palm Beach County, Florida | AM peak hour | Use PM | Palm Beach County alternative to ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-store | FDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2] | published trip rate |
| Pass-by, ITE land use 945, Phoenix, Oregon | Period not stated | 0.44, 0.25 and 0.21 net-new trip factors by size band | one factor per LUC 945 size band; the pack lists the three factors without pairing each to a band | City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1] | published trip rate |
Not verified in our research: the daily and AM peak rates per fueling position for this land use, and its pass-by shares. Pass-by rows are stated, never applied.
Traffic study triggers
| State, district or place | Study | Threshold as stored | Condition | Citation and edition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | TIA Category I | 100 trips in any one hour | Category I: 100 to under 500 | ADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3] |
| Arizona | TIA Category II | 500 trips in any one hour | ADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3] | |
| Arizona | traffic statement | 100 trips in any one hour | under 100: a traffic statement, including turn-lane analysis per TGP 245/430 | ADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3] |
| Prescott, Arizona | TIA | 100 trips in the AM or PM peak hour | Sec. 6.14 Traffic Impact Analysis[43] | |
| Napa, California | TIA | 50 peak-hour trips | residential | Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, Traffic Study Guidelines (source title dated 2005-5-12)[44] |
| Napa, California | TIA | 100 peak-hour trips | non-residential | Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, Traffic Study Guidelines (source title dated 2005-5-12)[44] |
| Frederick, Maryland | TIS | 50 weekday peak-hour trips | the pack writes "More than 50 weekday peak-hour trips and 100 on Saturday" | Traffic Impact Study Guidelines[45] |
| Minnesota | TIS (recommended) | 250 peak-hour trips | recommended threshold | MnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5[46] |
| Minnesota | TIS (recommended) | 2,500 new daily trips | recommended threshold | MnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5[46] |
| New Mexico | TIA | 100 peak-hour total trips | when the site threshold analysis shows it | 18.31.6.16 NMAC[47] |
| New Mexico | STA | all sites accessing a state highway | 18.31.6.16 NMAC[47] | |
| North Carolina | TIA | 3,000 daily trips | no trip reductions allowed when testing the threshold; below it, District Engineer discretion | Policy on Street and Driveway Access; TIA Checklist Instructions, 7-21-2017[9] |
| Indian Trail, North Carolina | TIA | 1,000 trips per day | TIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024[48] | |
| Indian Trail, North Carolina | TIA | 50 peak-hour trips | 50 to 100 peak-hour trips where facilities are at LOS D or worse | TIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024[48] |
| Johnston County, North Carolina | TIA | 100 lots or units | residential | Sec. 14-366[49] |
| Johnston County, North Carolina | TIA | 1,000 vehicles per day | non-residential | Sec. 14-366[49] |
| Johnston County, North Carolina | TIA | 100 peak-hour trips | non-residential | Sec. 14-366[49] |
| Ohio | full TIS | 200 peak-hour trips | State Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4] | |
| Ohio | Traffic Analysis | 60 peak-hour trips | Traffic Analysis at 60 to 200 | State Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4] |
| Ohio | turn-lane warrant submission | 10 peak-hour trips | turn-lane warrant submission only, at 10 to 59 | State Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4] |
| Pennsylvania | TIS | 3,000 trips per day | Condition 1 (daily volume) | Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies and Assessments, Condition 1, 6/4/2025 (SOL 494-25-07)[50] |
| Pennsylvania | TIS | 150 trips entering or exiting in any one hour | Condition 2 (hourly volume) | Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies and Assessments, Condition 2, 6/4/2025 (SOL 494-25-07)[50] |
| Denver Borough, Pennsylvania | TIS | 100 new trips in the peak direction during the site peak hour | Ch. 170 Art. VII[51] | |
| Denver Borough, Pennsylvania | TIS | 10,000 sf commercial | Ch. 170 Art. VII[51] | |
| South Dakota | TIS | 100 trips in the peak hour | in the adjacent highway's peak hour or the development's peak hour | SDDOT Road Design Manual, Ch. 17[52] |
| Tennessee | level-1 | 50 peak-hour trips | Level 1 at 50 to 99 peak-hour | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-1 | 250 daily trips | Level 1 at 250 to 499 daily | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-2 | 100 new peak-hour trips | Level 2 at 100 to 249 new peak-hour trips; 1/4-mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-2 | 500 new daily trips | Level 2 at 500 to 2,999 new daily trips; 1/4-mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-3 | 250 peak-hour trips | Level 3 at 250 to 399 peak; 1/2 mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-3 | 3,000 daily trips | Level 3 at 3,000 to 5,999 daily; 1/2 mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-4 | 400 peak-hour trips | Level 4 at 400 or more peak; 3/4 mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Tennessee | level-4 | 6,000 daily trips | Level 4 at 6,000 or more daily; 3/4 mile study area | TDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53] |
| Texas | No single statewide trip threshold | TxDOT Access Management Manual, Access Management Manual (2011)[7] | ||
| TxDOT Houston District | major study | 150 peak-hour trips | TxDOT Houston District only | Houston District Traffic Study Guidelines[8] |
| TxDOT Houston District | major study | 1,500 daily trips | TxDOT Houston District only | Houston District Traffic Study Guidelines[8] |
| Austin, Texas | TIA | 2,000 vehicle trips per day | LDC §25-6-113; §25-6-114[54] | |
| Austin, Texas | Neighborhood Traffic Analysis | 300 trips per day added to a qualifying street | the development adds them to a qualifying street | LDC §25-6-113; §25-6-114[54] |
| Brownsville, Texas | TIA | 100 trips in the AM or PM peak hour | Level 1 at 101 to 300 | Traffic and Design Guidelines[55] |
| Brownsville, Texas | TIA Level 2 | 301 trips in the AM or PM peak hour | Level 2 at 301 to 500 | Traffic and Design Guidelines[55] |
| Virginia | rezoning submission | 5,000 vehicle trips per day | at a state highway connection | 24VAC30-155-40, amended eff. 12/31/2011 (ITE 8th Ed. required)[6] |
| Virginia | rezoning submission | 400 vehicle trips per day | residential rezonings exceeding the highway's daily volume | 24VAC30-155-40, amended eff. 12/31/2011 (ITE 8th Ed. required)[6] |
| Virginia | study tier 100 to 499 | 100 peak-hour trips | study tier of 100 to 499 peak-hour trips | VDOT Administrative Guidelines for the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, Aug. 2022[5] |
| Virginia | study tier 500 or more | 500 peak-hour trips | VDOT Administrative Guidelines for the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, Aug. 2022[5] |
A state traffic study trigger is not verified in our research for: Alabama; Alaska; Arkansas; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Mississippi; Missouri; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New York; North Dakota; Oklahoma; Oregon; Rhode Island; South Carolina; Utah; Vermont; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.
Turn-lane warrants
| State | Turn and lane | Warrant as stored | Condition | Citation | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | Right turn, turn lane | 30 right turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane at 45 mph or more, advancing volume 201 to 300 (an example value from the table) | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Right turn, turn lane | 3 right turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane at 45 mph or more, advancing volume over 1,400 | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Right turn, turn lane | 85 right turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane under 45 mph, advancing volume 401 to 500 (an example value from the table) | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Right turn, turn lane | 5 right turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane under 45 mph, the lowest value as the table falls ("falling to 5"); the pack does not give the advancing volume for it | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Left turn, turn lane | 30 left turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane, under 45 mph, advancing volume under 200 | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Left turn, turn lane | 15 left turns per hour (vph) | 1 lane, 45 mph or more, advancing volume under 200 | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Left turn, turn lane | 12 left turns per hour (vph) | at most higher advancing volumes (the pack does not list them) | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | Code or agency rule |
| Arizona | Turns, dual turn lanes | 300 turns per hour (vph) | dual lanes considered | TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12] | agency guidance |
| Colorado | Right turn, deceleration | 25 right-turn ingress per hour (vph) | access category R-A; peak hour | 2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11] | Code or agency rule |
| Colorado | Right turn, acceleration | 50 vph | access category R-A; posted speed over 40 mph | 2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11] | Code or agency rule |
| Colorado | Right turn, turn lane | 10 vph | access category E-X | 2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11] | Code or agency rule |
| Colorado | Left turn, turn lane | 10 left-turn ingress per hour (vph) | access category R-A | 2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11] | Code or agency rule |
| Colorado | Left turn, turn lane | 10 vph (peak hour) | access category E-X | 2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 200 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 100 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 150 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 75 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 100 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 55 to 60 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 50 daily site right turns (RTV) | 2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 55 to 60 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | always | 2-lane road, speed 65 mph or more | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 200 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 100 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 150 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 75 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 100 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 55 to 60 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | 50 daily site right turns (RTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 55 to 60 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Right turn, turn lane | always | road with more than 2 lanes, speed 65 mph or more | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 300 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 200 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 35 mph or less | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 250 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 175 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mph | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 200 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 55 mph or more | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 150 daily left turns (LTV) | 2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 55 mph or more | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 400 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 35 mph or less (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 300 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 35 mph or less (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 325 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 40 to 50 mph (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 250 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mph (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 250 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 55 mph or more (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Georgia | Left turn, turn lane | 200 daily left turns (LTV) | road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 55 mph or more (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs) | Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10] | Code or agency rule |
| Missouri | Right turn, turn lane | 10 vph | not needed below this volume | EPG 940.9[56] | agency guidance |
| Missouri | Right turn, turn lane | 10% peak-hour turns as a share of daily | strongly consider when peak-hour turns exceed this share of daily | EPG 940.9[56] | agency guidance |
| Missouri | Right turn, turn lane | 60 mph operating speed | strongly consider when operating speed exceeds this | EPG 940.9[56] | agency guidance |
| Missouri | Left turn, turn lane | 10 vph | not needed below this volume | EPG 940.9[56] | agency guidance |
| Tennessee | Right turn, turn lane | 300 right turns per hour (veh/h) | signalized; adjacent through-lane volume exceeds 300 vphpl | HSAM Vol. 3 Design Criteria[57] | agency guidance |
| Texas | Left turn, deceleration | at all access points on non-traversable (raised) medians | non-traversable (raised) median | Access Management Manual, Table 2-3[58] | agency guidance |
Turn-lane warrants are not verified in our research for: Alabama; Alaska; Arkansas; California; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Minnesota; Mississippi; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Carolina; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Utah; Vermont; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.
Parking for a gas station with a convenience store
| City | Rule, by the code's own condition | As stored | Unit | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin, Texas | No minimum citywide | None | Title 25 as amended by Ord. 20231102-028[59] | |
| Baltimore, Maryland | No minimum citywide | Minimums per use type repealed | City Council Bill 25-0065, Enactment No. 25-064[60] | |
| Denver, Colorado | No minimum citywide | None | Denver Zoning Code "Modernizing Parking Requirements" text amendment[61] | |
| Houston, Texas | Service station | 3.0 | per service stall | Code of Ordinances Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e)[22] |
| Houston, Texas | Service station | 1.0 | per employee on largest shift | Code of Ordinances Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e)[22] |
| Milwaukee, Wisconsin | Filling station | as required by the board for special use approval | Code of Ordinances s. 295-403, Table 295-403-2-a[24] | |
| Portland, Oregon | No minimum citywide | None | Title 33, Chapter 33.266[62] | |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | No minimum citywide | None | TC-11-21 (Parking Minimums, Maximums, and Mitigations)[63] | |
| Sacramento, California | No minimum citywide | no minimum | City Code 17.608.030[64] | |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | Fueling station; all districts other than CBD | 1.50 | per 1,000 sq ft | Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23] |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | Convenience goods retail; all districts other than CBD | 2.50 | per 1,000 sq ft | Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23] |
| Tulsa, Oklahoma | Convenience goods retail | 5,000 | sq ft (none for the first 5,000 sq ft) | Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23] |
How a fueling area and a convenience store combine is not verified in our research where a code counts them apart. Where a city's no-minimum area or a state parking law depends on where the site is, the parking requirements lookup asks the location questions.
Truck design vehicles
Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses is not verified in our research, so the calculator shows the dimensions of the vehicle you choose and never picks one.
| Vehicle | Dimension | As stored | Condition | Citation and edition | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU-30 | Overall length | 30.0 ft (overall length) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Width | 8.0 ft (width) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Height | 13.5 ft (height) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Front overhang | 4.0 ft (front overhang) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Rear overhang | 6.0 ft (rear overhang) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Wheelbase WB1 | 20.0 ft (wheelbase WB1) | INDOT labels it "SU" | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Minimum design turning radius | 41.8 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Centerline turning radius | 38.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| SU-30 | Minimum inside radius | 28.4 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| SU-40 | Minimum design turning radius | 51.2 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| SU-40 | Centerline turning radius | 47.4 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| SU-40 | Minimum inside radius | 36.4 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-40 | Overall length | 45.5 ft (overall length) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Width | 8.0 ft (width) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Height | 13.5 ft (height) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Front overhang | 3.0 ft (front overhang) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Rear overhang | 2.5 ft (rear overhang) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Wheelbase WB1 | 12.5 ft (wheelbase WB1) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Wheelbase WB2 | 27.5 ft (wheelbase WB2) | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance | |
| WB-40 | Minimum design turning radius | 39.9 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-40 | Centerline turning radius | 36.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-40 | Minimum inside radius | 19.3 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-62 | Overall length | 68.5 ft (overall length) | length corroborated by TRB CTBSSP Synthesis 3, Table 2 (secondary), per the pack | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-62 | Minimum design turning radius | 44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TX | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-62 | Centerline turning radius | 41.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TX | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-62 | Minimum inside radius | 7.4 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TX | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Overall length | 73.5 ft (overall length) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Width | 8.5 ft (width) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Height | 13.5 ft (height) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Front overhang | 4.0 ft (front overhang) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Rear overhang | 4.5 ft (rear overhang) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Wheelbase WB1 | 21.6 ft (wheelbase WB1) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Wheelbase WB2 | 45.4 ft (wheelbase WB2) | INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary source | INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Minimum design turning radius | 44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAA | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Centerline turning radius | 41.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAA | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67 | Minimum inside radius | 1.9 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAA | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67D | Minimum design turning radius | 44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67D | Centerline turning radius | 40.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-67D | Minimum inside radius | 19.1 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-92D | Minimum design turning radius | 82.0 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-92D | Centerline turning radius | 78.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-92D | Minimum inside radius | 55.6 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-100T | Minimum design turning radius | 44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-100T | Centerline turning radius | 40.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-100T | Minimum inside radius | 9.7 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-109D | Minimum design turning radius | 59.9 ft (minimum design turning radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-109D | Centerline turning radius | 55.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
| WB-109D | Minimum inside radius | 13.8 ft (minimum inside radius) | minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius) | TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25] | agency guidance |
Places not verified in our research
For these cities and counties our research holds a row, but none it can show for a gas station, so the calculator lists their local rules as not verified in our research and still gives the state rules and the trips.
- Mesa, Arizona
- Tucson, Arizona
- Fresno, California
- Long Beach, California
- Los Angeles, California
- Oakland, California
- San Diego, California
- San Francisco, California
- San Jose, California
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
- Rocky Hill, Connecticut
- Washington, District of Columbia
- Jacksonville, Florida
- Miami, Florida
- Orlando, Florida
- Tampa, Florida
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Clarkston, Georgia
- Gwinnett County, Georgia
- Rome, Georgia
- Caldwell, Idaho
- Chicago, Illinois
- Indianapolis, Indiana
- Wichita, Kansas
- Louisville, Kentucky
- New Orleans, Louisiana
- Boston, Massachusetts
- Calvert County, Maryland
- Gaithersburg, Maryland
- Montgomery County, Maryland
- Harper Woods, Michigan
- Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Kansas City, Missouri
- Omaha, Nebraska
- Oakland, New Jersey
- Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Las Vegas, Nevada
- New York, New York
- Columbus, Ohio
- Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Memphis, Tennessee
- Nashville, Tennessee
- Arlington, Texas
- El Paso, Texas
- Staunton, Virginia
- Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Seattle, Washington
- Most other US cities and counties
Worked examples
Computed by the calculator's own engine from the rows above when this page was built.
- State
- (TX)
- City or county
- (tx-houston)
- Vehicle fueling positions
- 8
- Convenience store, square feet
- 3000
- Reading
- Trips by the ITE band
- Rate edition and label
- ;
- Traffic study,
- Traffic study,
- Traffic study,
- Tank program agency
- ,
- Parking,
- Delivery design vehicle chosen
- WB-67
- Site area
- Not verified in our research
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
- State
- (FL)
- City or county
- (fl-palm-beach-county)
- Vehicle fueling positions
- 8
- Convenience store, square feet
- 3000
- Reading
- County equation
- County equation
- County equation
- County equation
- Trips by the ITE band
- Rate edition and label
- ;
- Tank program agency
- Not verified in our research
- Site area
- Not verified in our research
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
- State
- (VA)
- Vehicle fueling positions
- 12
- Convenience store, square feet
- 4500
- Reading
- Trips by the ITE band
- Rate edition and label
- ;
- Traffic study,
- Traffic study,
- Traffic study,
- Traffic study,
- Tank program agency
- Not verified in our research
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- Delivery design vehicle chosen
- WB-40
- Site area
- Not verified in our research
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
- State
- (MD)
- City or county
- (md-prince-george-s-county)
- Vehicle fueling positions
- 16
- Convenience store, square feet
- 6000
- Reading
- Trips by the ITE band
- Rate edition and label
- ;
- Tank program agency
- Not verified in our research
- ,
- ,
- Site area
- Not verified in our research
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
What the calculator leaves out
No prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator gives none. The site area follows from the program: the fueling positions, the store, the canopy, the parking, the delivery truck's path and the local separations, which a preliminary site plan lays out before the engineering set.
The tank agency is shown only where our research verified it from the agency's own page. For the other states, and for the fees, installer rules and funds of every state, the calculator says not verified in our research. Canopy clearance and canopy lighting, the spacing of dispenser islands, convenience store sizes by format, and the distance between EV charging equipment and dispensers are not verified in our research either.
Separation rules reported for Montgomery County and Gaithersburg, Maryland; Rome, Clarkston and Gwinnett County, Georgia; Oakland, New Jersey; Staunton, Virginia; Rocky Hill, Connecticut; Harper Woods, Michigan; and Seattle rest on memos, secondary sites, conflicting sources or text that did not match when it was opened. The calculator lists them as not verified in our research rather than showing a distance.
The estimate is a PM peak hour figure before any pass-by reduction. A gas station's busiest hour can fall outside the PM peak, and the band rates are the 11th Edition values as an agency table republishes them. Codes change, and a condition of approval or a reviewer's own analysis can require more than the rows show. The calculator reads every row as researched on October 11, 2026, and a gas station site plan should be checked against the code in force when the application is filed.
Frequently asked questions
How far must a fuel dispenser be from the property line?
Under the International Fire Code, 10 ft or more from lot lines (IFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1) [17]. Virginia's 13VAC5-52-280 sets dispensing at least 10 ft from adjoining buildable lot lines and 5 ft from building openings [17]. The model code binds only where a state or city has adopted it, so the calculator labels it a model standard.
How far from a school must a gas station be?
In Prince George's County, Maryland, the nearest pump must be 300 ft from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence under the gas station special exception, Zoning Sec. 27-358 [20]. Distances reported for other places in our research rest on memos or secondary sources, so the calculator lists them as not verified in our research.
How many trips does a gas station with a convenience store generate?
Under ITE's 11th Edition, as the City of Phoenix, Oregon republishes it, 18.42 PM peak trips per vehicle fueling position for a store of 2,000 to 4,000 sf, 22.76 for 4,000 to 5,500 sf and 26.90 for 5,500 to 10,000 sf [1]. Palm Beach County requires the FDOT equation instead: 12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips [2].
Does a gas station need a traffic impact study?
It depends on the state and the city. Arizona's threshold is 100 or more trips in any one hour [3], Ohio's full TIS starts above 200 peak-hour trips [4], and the TxDOT Houston District calls for a major study at 150 or more peak-hour or 1,500 or more daily trips [8]. The calculator compares its PM peak estimate with each trigger that counts trips in an hour.
Who regulates the underground storage tanks of a new gas station?
How much land does a gas station and c-store need?
No prototype site area is verified in our research, so the calculator does not give one. The area follows from the fueling positions, the store, the parking, the delivery truck's path and the local separations, which the preliminary site plan lays out.
Sources
- 1)ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, system development charge table, City of Phoenix, Oregon. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 2)Palm Beach County Trip Generation Rates, Palm Beach County Engineering, Traffic Division. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 3)TGP 240, Traffic Impact Analysis and Statement, Arizona Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 4)State Highway Access Management Manual, Ohio Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 5)Traffic Impact Analysis Administrative Guidelines, August 2022, Virginia Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 6)24VAC30-155-40, Traffic impact analysis requirements, Virginia Administrative Code. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 7)Access Management Manual, engineering study versus traffic impact analysis, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 8)Houston District Traffic Study Guidelines, Texas Department of Transportation, Houston District. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 9)TIA Checklist Instructions, 7-21-2017, North Carolina Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 10)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Chapter 4, Georgia Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 11)2 CCR 601-1, State Highway Access Code, Colorado Secretary of State, Code of Colorado Regulations. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 12)TGP 245, Turn Lane Warrants, Arizona Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 13)List of States With Approved UST Programs and Respective Federal Register Notices, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 14)Petroleum storage tanks: am I regulated?, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 15)UST facility owners, Georgia Environmental Protection Division. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 16)Notification and Fees, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Underground Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 17)13VAC5-52-280, IFC Chapter 23 Motor Fuel-Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, Virginia Administrative Code. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 18)Fuel dispensing operations, code requirements handout. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 19)REM-41, additional operating requirements for unattended facilities (2025), New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 20)Zoning Sec. 27-358, Gas station (special exception), Prince George's County, Maryland. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 21)Zoning Ordinance Sec. 623, Commercial C-2 District, Intermediate Commercial, City of Phoenix, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 22)Code of Ordinances Sec. 26-492, parking spaces for certain types of use classifications, City of Houston, Planning and Development Department. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 23)Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 as amended by Ord. 25429, Tulsa Planning Office. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 24)Code of Ordinances Ch. 295, s. 295-403, Table 295-403-2-a, City of Milwaukee. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 25)Roadway Design Manual, 4.3.3 Control Vehicles, Table 4-1, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 26)Design Manual Figure 40-4A, Design Vehicle Dimensions (archived 2006 English edition), Indiana Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 27)Alabama Department of Environmental Management ALABAMA UNDERGROUND AND. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 28)Registration, Fees, and Financial Assurance. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 29)ownership and operation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 30)Financial Responsibility - Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 31)Updated May 2025 Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 32)Administrative Services Section - Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 33)Storage Tank Division. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 34)Underground Storage Tank Financial Responsibility. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 35)Underground Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 36)Financial Responsibility Requirements - NC DEQ. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 37)25 Pa. Code Chapter 245. Administration Of The Storage Tank And Spill Prevention Program. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 38)RI.gov: DEM Underground Storage Tank Registration - State of Rhode Island. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 39)S.C. Code 44-2 (SUPERB); R.61-98. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 40)Utah UST Certificate of Compliance - Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-09.
- 41)UST Newsletter. Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 42)MOTOR FUEL-DISPENSING FACILITIES AND REPAIR .... Accessed 2026-10-10.
- 43)Sec. 6.14 / Traffic Impact Analysis 6.14.1 / Purpose. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 44)Napa Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 45)city of frederick. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 46)MnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 47)18.31.6.16 NMAC. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 48)Indian Trail TIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 49)Sec. 14-366. - Traffic impact analysis (TIA).. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 50)policies-and-procedures-for-transportation-impact-studies- .... Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 51)Article VII: Traffic Impact Studies - Borough of Denver, PA. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 52)CHAPTER 17 ACCESS MANAGEMENT General 17-3 Permit Procedures 17-3. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 53)TRAFFIC DESIGN MANUAL Traffic Operations Division Traffic Engineering Office. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 54)Austin Transportation & Public Works. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 55)CITY OF BROWNSVILLE Traffic & Design Guidelines Page 1 of 7. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 56)940.9 Auxiliary Acceleration and Turning Lanes - Engineering Policy Guide. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 57)Tennessee Department of Transportation Highway System Access Manual (HSAM). Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 58)Auxiliary Lanes. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 59)C20-2023-039 1 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 60)City of Baltimore - File #: 25-0065. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 61)Denver Zoning Code Modernizing Parking Requirements text amendment. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 62)191310. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 63)Raleigh TC-11-21. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 64)ORDINANCE 2025-0007 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council April 8, 2025. Accessed 2026-10-11.
Rules as researched on October 11, 2026. Each row of the table carries its own date.
Start a project with these numbers
Send the site and the program. The studio reads your inputs and the result above with the brief, and replies to scope the preliminary site plan.