Tools / Gas stations

Gas station and c-store site fit calculator

Pick the state and, where our research holds one, the city or county, then enter the vehicle fueling positions and the store size. The calculator gives a preliminary estimate of the PM peak hour trips, the traffic study and turn-lane rules the rows verify, the state's tank program agency, the dispenser separations, the parking rows and the delivery truck's dimensions. It gives no site area, because no prototype site area is verified in our research.

Estimate the site rules

How the calculator reads a gas station

The calculator starts from two numbers a fuel site program fixes early: the vehicle fueling positions (VFP), each place where one vehicle can fuel at a time, and the floor area of the convenience store. ITE's 11th Edition bands land use 945, Convenience Store/Gas Station, by store size and fueling position count, and its PM peak rates rise from 18.42 to 26.90 trips per VFP as the store grows [1]. From those two inputs the calculator estimates the PM peak hour trips, compares them with the traffic study triggers of the state and the place, and lists the turn-lane warrants, the state's underground storage tank (UST) program agency, the dispenser separations, the parking rows and the dimensions of the delivery design vehicle you choose. Each figure it shows is read from a row cited to its source. The gas station site plan page shows how those distances shape the layout around the pumps, the store and the canopy.

Trips from fueling positions and store size

The City of Phoenix, Oregon, republishes the 11th Edition PM peak rates for land use 945 in three bands: 18.42 per VFP for a store of 2,000 to 4,000 sf with 8 or fewer VFP, 22.76 for 4,000 to 5,500 sf with 12 to 20 VFP, and 26.90 for 5,500 to 10,000 sf with about 16 VFP [1]. The calculator picks the band by the store size you enter, multiplies its rate by your fueling positions, and labels the result with the edition and the table it comes from [1]. A store of exactly 4,000 or 5,500 sf sits on a limit two bands share as the table writes them, so the calculator shows both estimates and does not choose between them [1]. The fueling position count a band names is shown beside the estimate and never used to pick the band, and a store under 2,000 or over 10,000 sf gets no estimate, because no band in the table covers it [1].

Florida holds the exception in the rows. Palm Beach County requires the FDOT two-variable equation instead of ITE, and prohibits internalization between pumps and store [2]. The county's table gives 12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips, split 50/50, a daily volume of 14.3 x PM trips, and "Use PM" for the AM peak, from an FDOT study the county adopted on 7/25/2022 [2]. Where you choose Palm Beach County, the calculator computes that equation, compares its PM peak figure with the triggers, and shows the ITE band beside it. The Florida site plan page covers the decision clocks and state layers a Florida application meets.

Pass-by changes what a traffic study counts. Phoenix, Oregon applies net-new factors of 0.44, 0.25 and 0.21 by size band [1]. The calculator states those factors with their label and never applies them, because the table, as our research reads it, does not pair each factor with a band. ITE's own pass-by shares for land use 945 are not verified in our research, and neither are its daily and AM peak rates per fueling position.

Traffic studies and turn lanes

Each state's transportation department sets traffic study thresholds for access to its highways, and some cities and counties set their own; the calculator shows the rows of the state you choose and of the place, where our research holds one. Arizona's TGP 240 calls for a traffic impact analysis at 100 or more trips in any one hour, Category I from 100 to under 500 and Category II at 500 or more, and a traffic statement under 100 [3]. Ohio calls for a full TIS above 200 peak-hour trips, a Traffic Analysis at 60 to 200, and a turn-lane warrant submission only at 10 to 59 [4]. Virginia's administrative guidelines set study tiers of 100 to 499 and 500 or more peak-hour trips [5], and 24VAC30-155-40 calls for a rezoning submission at more than 5,000 vehicle trips per day at a state highway connection [6]. Texas has no single statewide trip threshold [7], and the TxDOT Houston District calls for a major study at 150 or more peak-hour or 1,500 or more daily trips [8]. The Texas gas station site plan page covers TxDOT access on frontage roads and state highways.

The calculator compares its PM peak estimate only with a trigger that counts trips in a peak hour or in any one hour, and the county equation's daily figure only with a daily trigger. A trigger that counts new trips is stated and not compared, because the estimate comes before any pass-by reduction. North Carolina's threshold of 3,000 or more daily trips allows no trip reductions when testing it, and below it the District Engineer decides [9].

Turn-lane warrants count turning vehicles at a driveway, which the calculator does not estimate, so it shows them as the rows state them. Georgia sets right-turn lanes by daily site right-turn volume: on a 2-lane road with AADT under 6,000, 200 at 35 mph or less, 150 at 40 to 50 mph and 100 at 55 to 60 mph, and always at 65 mph or more [10]. Colorado's access code sets a deceleration lane at more than 25 vph of right-turn ingress in access category R-A [11]. Arizona's TGP 245 warrants a left-turn lane at 30 vph under 45 mph, or 15 at 45 mph or more, when advancing volume is under 200 [12]. The Georgia gas station site plan page covers the access geometry GDOT fixes on the plan, and the Gwinnett County gas station and c-store case study is a model project on the county's rulebook.

Tanks, dispensers and separations

Underground storage tanks answer to a state agency where EPA has approved the state's program. Under 40 CFR Part 282, an approved program operates in lieu of the federal one, and as of September 2021, 39 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico had approved programs [13]. The calculator names the agency of each state where our research verified it: the TCEQ PST Program under 30 TAC Ch. 334 in Texas [14], the EPD UST Management Program under Ga. Comp. R. and Regs. 391-3-15 in Georgia [15], and the TDEC Division of USTs under Tenn. Comp. R. and Regs. 0400-18-01 in Tennessee [16]. For every other state it says the agency is not verified in our research.

The siting distances start from the model codes. The International Fire Code puts dispensers 10 ft or more from lot lines (IFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1), 10 ft or more from buildings with combustible walls or non-rated noncombustible walls, and 20 ft or more from fixed ignition sources (IFC 2303.1 items 2 and 5), and it places the emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensers (IFC 2303.2) [17, 18]. Those distances bind only where a state or city has adopted them, so the calculator labels them a model standard. Virginia's code, 13VAC5-52-280, sets dispensing at least 10 ft from adjoining buildable lot lines and 5 ft from building openings, prohibits smoking and open flames within 20 ft of dispensers, and puts dispensers within 10 ft of vehicle traffic on a 6 in concrete island or Section 312 protection [17]. New Hampshire applies NFPA 30A as adopted in its 2021 edition: the emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensers, and 75 ft maximum travel to an extinguisher [19].

Local rules sit on top of the model codes, and the calculator shows a county or city row only where it was verified from the code. Prince George's County, Maryland, allows a gas station by special exception under Zoning Sec. 27-358(a), with the nearest pump 300 ft from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence, and 150 ft of frontage on a 70 ft right-of-way [20]. Phoenix's Zoning Ordinance §623 keeps tractor-trailer stacking and loading docks at least 60 ft from residential zoning [21]. The car wash and gas station regulations by state guide sets these rules beside each state's tank program and fire code.

Parking and the delivery truck

Parking codes rarely name a gas station with a convenience store as a use of its own, so the calculator shows a city's rows by the code's own condition. Houston's Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e) sets 3.0 spaces per service stall plus 1.0 per employee on the largest shift for a service station, and the convenience store component is not verified in our research [22]. Tulsa's Table 55-1 sets 1.50 per 1,000 sq ft for a fueling station and 2.50 per 1,000 sq ft for convenience goods retail, with none for the first 5,000 sq ft, under Ord. 25429, effective 12/10/2024 [23]. How Tulsa's two ratios combine is not verified in our research. Milwaukee sets parking for a filling station as required by the board for special use approval [24]. The parking requirements lookup holds the same rows beside other uses and asks the location questions where a city's no-minimum area or a state parking law applies.

The delivery truck sets the turning path at the driveways and around the canopy, but which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses is not verified in our research, so the calculator shows the dimensions of the vehicle you choose and never picks one. TxDOT's Roadway Design Manual Table 4-1 gives the WB-67 interstate semi-trailer a 44.8 ft minimum design turning radius, a 41.0 ft centerline turning radius and a 1.9 ft minimum inside radius [25]. INDOT's Figure 40-4A, the archived 2006 English edition, lists the same vehicle as WB-65, the Indiana Design Vehicle, with an overall length of 73.5 ft, a width of 8.5 ft and a height of 13.5 ft, and gives the SU-30 single-unit truck a length of 30.0 ft [26]. Sites that also fuel tractor-trailers are covered on the truck stop site plan page, and the car wash stacking calculator covers a wash bay added to a fuel site.

The rows in the calculator

124 verified code values, each cited to the code, rule or agency page it comes from, and the reference figures beside them with their labels, as researched on October 11, 2026. A value is stored exactly as its source writes it; the calculator does the arithmetic. No site area appears here: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research.

Underground storage tank program agency by state

StateAgency as storedRule citationCondition
AlabamaADEMAla. Admin. Code 335-6-15, 335-6-16[27]
ArkansasDivision of Environmental QualityNot given[28]
ColoradoCDLE Division of Oil and Public Safety7 CCR 1101-14[29]
GeorgiaEPD UST Management ProgramGa. Comp. R. and Regs. 391-3-15[15]
IndianaIDEM Office of Land QualityNot given[30]
IowaDNR UST SectionNot given[31]
KentuckyEEC Division of Waste Management, UST Branch401 KAR 42:020[32]
MichiganLARA Bureau of Fire Services, Storage Tank DivisionNREPA Part 211; Michigan UST Rules[33]
MissouriDNRRSMo 319.100 to 319.139[34]
NebraskaState Fire MarshalNot given[35]State Fire Marshal for tank permits, registration and inspection; the state environmental agency handles the remedial action fund (agency name per the ST-NE correction)
North CarolinaDEQ Division of Waste Management, UST Section15A NCAC 02P (fund)[36]
PennsylvaniaDEP25 Pa. Code Ch. 245[37]
Rhode IslandDEMRules under RIGL 42-17.1, 46-12, 46-13[38]
South CarolinaSC Dept. of Environmental ServicesS.C. Code 44-2 (SUPERB); R.61-98[39]
TennesseeTDEC Division of USTsTenn. Comp. R. and Regs. 0400-18-01[16]
TexasTCEQ PST Program30 TAC Ch. 334[14]
UtahDEQ ERRNot given[40]
VermontDECVermont UST Rules[41]

The agency of these states is not verified in our research: Alaska; Arizona; California; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Kansas; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Minnesota; Mississippi; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; South Dakota; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.

Dispenser separations and siting rules

The model standard rows come from the International Fire Code and the NFPA motor fuel dispensing standard, as their sources quote them; they bind only where a state or city has adopted them. The state, county and city rows are code.

WhereRuleAs storedConditionCitationLabel
United StatesDispenser to lot lines10 ft or moreIFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1(1)[17]model standard
United StatesDispenser to buildings with combustible or non-rated walls10 ft or morebuildings with combustible walls or non-rated noncombustible wallsIFC 2303.1 item 2[18]model standard
United StatesDispenser to fixed ignition sources20 ft or morefixed ignition sourcesIFC 2303.1 item 5[18]model standard
United StatesHose reach to building openings5 fta fully extended hose must not reach within 5 ft of building openings; vehicle fueled wholly on premisesIFC 2303.1 items 3 and 4[42]model standard
United StatesEmergency shutoff from dispensers20 ft (minimum)emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensersIFC 2303.2[18]model standard
United StatesEmergency shutoff from dispensers100 ft (maximum)emergency shutoff within 100 ft of, but not less than 20 ft from, dispensersIFC 2303.2[18]model standard
New HampshireEmergency shutoff from dispensers20 ft (minimum)emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensers, plus an added device per island groupNFPA 30A §6.7 (2021, as adopted in NH), NFPA 30A 2021[19]Code
New HampshireEmergency shutoff from dispensers100 ft (maximum)emergency shutoff not less than 20 ft nor more than 100 ft from dispensersNFPA 30A §6.7 (2021, as adopted in NH), NFPA 30A 2021[19]Code
New HampshireFire extinguisher travel distance75 ft maximum travelNFPA 30A §9.5.2.7 (2021), NFPA 30A 2021[19]Code
Phoenix, ArizonaTruck stacking and loading docks to residential zoning60 ft (minimum)tractor-trailer stacking and loading docks from residential zoningPhoenix Zoning Ordinance §623[21]Code
Prince George's County, MarylandNearest pump to a lot with a school, playground, library, hospital or residence300 ftnearest pump from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence; gas station special exceptionPrince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)[20]Code
Prince George's County, MarylandStreet frontage150 ft of frontageon a 70 ft right-of-way; gas station special exceptionPrince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)[20]Code
VirginiaDispenser to lot lines10 ft (minimum)from adjoining buildable lot lines13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)[17]Code
VirginiaDispenser to building openings5 ft (minimum)from building openings13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)[17]Code
VirginiaSmoking and open flames near dispensers20 ftsmoking and open flames prohibited within 20 ft of dispensersIFC 2305.4 (Virginia text)[17]Code
VirginiaDispenser protection near vehicle traffic6 in concrete islanddispensers within 10 ft of vehicle traffic, unless Section 312 protection is provided13VAC5-52-280[17]Code
VirginiaVapor processing equipment to buildings or lot lines10 ftvapor processing equipment from buildings or buildable lot linesIFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)[17]Code
VirginiaVapor processing equipment to dispensers20 ftvapor processing equipment from dispensersIFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)[17]Code

Not verified in our research: EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Clarkston, Georgia; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Gwinnett County, Georgia; Drive aisle around pump islands, Gwinnett County, Georgia; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Harper Woods, Michigan; Large stations to schools, homes and other sensitive lots, Montgomery County, Maryland; Dispenser to lot lines, North Carolina; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Oakland, New Jersey; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Rocky Hill, Connecticut; Separation from schools, churches, other stations and homes, Rome, Georgia; Tanks and dispensers to lot lines, Seattle, Washington; Separation from schools, homes and other sensitive uses, Staunton, Virginia.

Trip rates, the county equation and pass-by

RatePeriodAs storedConditionEdition and sourceLabel
ITE land use 945, store 2,000 to 4,000 sq ftPM peak hour18.42 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP)LUC 945 band: store 2,000 to 4,000 sf, 8 or fewer VFPITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1]published trip rate
ITE land use 945, store 4,000 to 5,500 sq ftPM peak hour22.76 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP)LUC 945 band: store 4,000 to 5,500 sf, 12 to 20 VFPITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1]published trip rate
ITE land use 945, store 5,500 to 10,000 sq ftPM peak hour26.90 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP)LUC 945 band: store 5,500 to 10,000 sf, about 16 VFPITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1]published trip rate
Equation, Palm Beach County, FloridaPM peak hour12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips (VFP = vehicle fueling positions; store ksf = store area in 1,000 sf)Palm Beach County requires this FDOT two-variable equation instead of ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-storeFDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2]published trip rate
Equation, Palm Beach County, FloridaDaily14.3 x PM trips daily tripsPalm Beach County alternative to ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-storeFDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2]published trip rate
Equation, Palm Beach County, FloridaAM peak hourUse PM Palm Beach County alternative to ITE land use 945 for a gas station with c-storeFDOT study, adopted by Palm Beach County 7/25/2022[2]published trip rate
Pass-by, ITE land use 945, Phoenix, OregonPeriod not stated0.44, 0.25 and 0.21 net-new trip factors by size bandone factor per LUC 945 size band; the pack lists the three factors without pairing each to a bandCity of Phoenix, OR SDC table[1]published trip rate

Not verified in our research: the daily and AM peak rates per fueling position for this land use, and its pass-by shares. Pass-by rows are stated, never applied.

Traffic study triggers

State, district or placeStudyThreshold as storedConditionCitation and edition
ArizonaTIA Category I100 trips in any one hourCategory I: 100 to under 500ADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3]
ArizonaTIA Category II500 trips in any one hourADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3]
Arizonatraffic statement100 trips in any one hourunder 100: a traffic statement, including turn-lane analysis per TGP 245/430ADOT TGP 240, Aug. 2021[3]
Prescott, ArizonaTIA100 trips in the AM or PM peak hourSec. 6.14 Traffic Impact Analysis[43]
Napa, CaliforniaTIA50 peak-hour tripsresidentialTraffic Impact Analysis guidelines, Traffic Study Guidelines (source title dated 2005-5-12)[44]
Napa, CaliforniaTIA100 peak-hour tripsnon-residentialTraffic Impact Analysis guidelines, Traffic Study Guidelines (source title dated 2005-5-12)[44]
Frederick, MarylandTIS50 weekday peak-hour tripsthe pack writes "More than 50 weekday peak-hour trips and 100 on Saturday"Traffic Impact Study Guidelines[45]
MinnesotaTIS (recommended)250 peak-hour tripsrecommended thresholdMnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5[46]
MinnesotaTIS (recommended)2,500 new daily tripsrecommended thresholdMnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5[46]
New MexicoTIA100 peak-hour total tripswhen the site threshold analysis shows it18.31.6.16 NMAC[47]
New MexicoSTAall sites accessing a state highway 18.31.6.16 NMAC[47]
North CarolinaTIA3,000 daily tripsno trip reductions allowed when testing the threshold; below it, District Engineer discretionPolicy on Street and Driveway Access; TIA Checklist Instructions, 7-21-2017[9]
Indian Trail, North CarolinaTIA1,000 trips per dayTIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024[48]
Indian Trail, North CarolinaTIA50 peak-hour trips50 to 100 peak-hour trips where facilities are at LOS D or worseTIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024[48]
Johnston County, North CarolinaTIA100 lots or unitsresidentialSec. 14-366[49]
Johnston County, North CarolinaTIA1,000 vehicles per daynon-residentialSec. 14-366[49]
Johnston County, North CarolinaTIA100 peak-hour tripsnon-residentialSec. 14-366[49]
Ohiofull TIS200 peak-hour tripsState Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4]
OhioTraffic Analysis60 peak-hour tripsTraffic Analysis at 60 to 200State Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4]
Ohioturn-lane warrant submission10 peak-hour tripsturn-lane warrant submission only, at 10 to 59State Highway Access Management Manual, revised July 2026[4]
PennsylvaniaTIS3,000 trips per dayCondition 1 (daily volume)Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies and Assessments, Condition 1, 6/4/2025 (SOL 494-25-07)[50]
PennsylvaniaTIS150 trips entering or exiting in any one hourCondition 2 (hourly volume)Policies and Procedures for Transportation Impact Studies and Assessments, Condition 2, 6/4/2025 (SOL 494-25-07)[50]
Denver Borough, PennsylvaniaTIS100 new trips in the peak direction during the site peak hourCh. 170 Art. VII[51]
Denver Borough, PennsylvaniaTIS10,000 sf commercialCh. 170 Art. VII[51]
South DakotaTIS100 trips in the peak hourin the adjacent highway's peak hour or the development's peak hourSDDOT Road Design Manual, Ch. 17[52]
Tennesseelevel-150 peak-hour tripsLevel 1 at 50 to 99 peak-hourTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-1250 daily tripsLevel 1 at 250 to 499 dailyTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-2100 new peak-hour tripsLevel 2 at 100 to 249 new peak-hour trips; 1/4-mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-2500 new daily tripsLevel 2 at 500 to 2,999 new daily trips; 1/4-mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-3250 peak-hour tripsLevel 3 at 250 to 399 peak; 1/2 mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-33,000 daily tripsLevel 3 at 3,000 to 5,999 daily; 1/2 mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-4400 peak-hour tripsLevel 4 at 400 or more peak; 3/4 mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
Tennesseelevel-46,000 daily tripsLevel 4 at 6,000 or more daily; 3/4 mile study areaTDOT Traffic Design Manual, Table 2.1, Aug. 2018[53]
TexasNo single statewide trip threshold TxDOT Access Management Manual, Access Management Manual (2011)[7]
TxDOT Houston Districtmajor study150 peak-hour tripsTxDOT Houston District onlyHouston District Traffic Study Guidelines[8]
TxDOT Houston Districtmajor study1,500 daily tripsTxDOT Houston District onlyHouston District Traffic Study Guidelines[8]
Austin, TexasTIA2,000 vehicle trips per dayLDC §25-6-113; §25-6-114[54]
Austin, TexasNeighborhood Traffic Analysis300 trips per day added to a qualifying streetthe development adds them to a qualifying streetLDC §25-6-113; §25-6-114[54]
Brownsville, TexasTIA100 trips in the AM or PM peak hourLevel 1 at 101 to 300Traffic and Design Guidelines[55]
Brownsville, TexasTIA Level 2301 trips in the AM or PM peak hourLevel 2 at 301 to 500Traffic and Design Guidelines[55]
Virginiarezoning submission5,000 vehicle trips per dayat a state highway connection24VAC30-155-40, amended eff. 12/31/2011 (ITE 8th Ed. required)[6]
Virginiarezoning submission400 vehicle trips per dayresidential rezonings exceeding the highway's daily volume24VAC30-155-40, amended eff. 12/31/2011 (ITE 8th Ed. required)[6]
Virginiastudy tier 100 to 499100 peak-hour tripsstudy tier of 100 to 499 peak-hour tripsVDOT Administrative Guidelines for the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, Aug. 2022[5]
Virginiastudy tier 500 or more500 peak-hour tripsVDOT Administrative Guidelines for the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, Aug. 2022[5]

A state traffic study trigger is not verified in our research for: Alabama; Alaska; Arkansas; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Mississippi; Missouri; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New York; North Dakota; Oklahoma; Oregon; Rhode Island; South Carolina; Utah; Vermont; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.

Turn-lane warrants

StateTurn and laneWarrant as storedConditionCitationLabel
ArizonaRight turn, turn lane30 right turns per hour (vph)1 lane at 45 mph or more, advancing volume 201 to 300 (an example value from the table)TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaRight turn, turn lane3 right turns per hour (vph)1 lane at 45 mph or more, advancing volume over 1,400TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaRight turn, turn lane85 right turns per hour (vph)1 lane under 45 mph, advancing volume 401 to 500 (an example value from the table)TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaRight turn, turn lane5 right turns per hour (vph)1 lane under 45 mph, the lowest value as the table falls ("falling to 5"); the pack does not give the advancing volume for itTGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaLeft turn, turn lane30 left turns per hour (vph)1 lane, under 45 mph, advancing volume under 200TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaLeft turn, turn lane15 left turns per hour (vph)1 lane, 45 mph or more, advancing volume under 200TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaLeft turn, turn lane12 left turns per hour (vph)at most higher advancing volumes (the pack does not list them)TGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]Code or agency rule
ArizonaTurns, dual turn lanes300 turns per hour (vph)dual lanes consideredTGP 245, Jan. 2019[12]agency guidance
ColoradoRight turn, deceleration25 right-turn ingress per hour (vph)access category R-A; peak hour2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11]Code or agency rule
ColoradoRight turn, acceleration50 vphaccess category R-A; posted speed over 40 mph2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11]Code or agency rule
ColoradoRight turn, turn lane10 vphaccess category E-X2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11]Code or agency rule
ColoradoLeft turn, turn lane10 left-turn ingress per hour (vph)access category R-A2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11]Code or agency rule
ColoradoLeft turn, turn lane10 vph (peak hour)access category E-X2 CCR 601-1 §§3.5, 3.7, 3.8, version not shown (read from a third-party copy)[11]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane200 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane100 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane150 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane75 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane100 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT under 6,000, speed 55 to 60 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane50 daily site right turns (RTV)2-lane road, AADT 6,000 or more, speed 55 to 60 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lanealways 2-lane road, speed 65 mph or moreRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane200 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane100 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane150 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane75 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane100 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT under 10,000, speed 55 to 60 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lane50 daily site right turns (RTV)road with more than 2 lanes, AADT 10,000 or more, speed 55 to 60 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaRight turn, turn lanealways road with more than 2 lanes, speed 65 mph or moreRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane300 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane200 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 35 mph or lessRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane250 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane175 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mphRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane200 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT under 6,000, speed 55 mph or moreRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane150 daily left turns (LTV)2-lane road, ADT 6,000 or more, speed 55 mph or moreRegulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane400 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 35 mph or less (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane300 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 35 mph or less (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane325 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 40 to 50 mph (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane250 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 40 to 50 mph (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane250 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT under 10,000, speed 55 mph or more (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
GeorgiaLeft turn, turn lane200 daily left turns (LTV)road with more than 2 lanes, ADT 10,000 or more, speed 55 mph or more (the pack lists the more-than-2-lane pairs in the same speed order as the 2-lane pairs)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Ch. 4, Tables 4-6 and 4-7A[10]Code or agency rule
MissouriRight turn, turn lane10 vphnot needed below this volumeEPG 940.9[56]agency guidance
MissouriRight turn, turn lane10% peak-hour turns as a share of dailystrongly consider when peak-hour turns exceed this share of dailyEPG 940.9[56]agency guidance
MissouriRight turn, turn lane60 mph operating speedstrongly consider when operating speed exceeds thisEPG 940.9[56]agency guidance
MissouriLeft turn, turn lane10 vphnot needed below this volumeEPG 940.9[56]agency guidance
TennesseeRight turn, turn lane300 right turns per hour (veh/h)signalized; adjacent through-lane volume exceeds 300 vphplHSAM Vol. 3 Design Criteria[57]agency guidance
TexasLeft turn, decelerationat all access points on non-traversable (raised) medians non-traversable (raised) medianAccess Management Manual, Table 2-3[58]agency guidance

Turn-lane warrants are not verified in our research for: Alabama; Alaska; Arkansas; California; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Minnesota; Mississippi; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Carolina; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Utah; Vermont; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming.

Parking for a gas station with a convenience store

CityRule, by the code's own conditionAs storedUnitCitation
Austin, TexasNo minimum citywideNoneTitle 25 as amended by Ord. 20231102-028[59]
Baltimore, MarylandNo minimum citywideMinimums per use type repealedCity Council Bill 25-0065, Enactment No. 25-064[60]
Denver, ColoradoNo minimum citywideNoneDenver Zoning Code "Modernizing Parking Requirements" text amendment[61]
Houston, TexasService station3.0per service stallCode of Ordinances Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e)[22]
Houston, TexasService station1.0per employee on largest shiftCode of Ordinances Sec. 26-492 Class 9(e)[22]
Milwaukee, WisconsinFilling stationas required by the board for special use approvalCode of Ordinances s. 295-403, Table 295-403-2-a[24]
Portland, OregonNo minimum citywideNoneTitle 33, Chapter 33.266[62]
Raleigh, North CarolinaNo minimum citywideNoneTC-11-21 (Parking Minimums, Maximums, and Mitigations)[63]
Sacramento, CaliforniaNo minimum citywideno minimumCity Code 17.608.030[64]
Tulsa, OklahomaFueling station; all districts other than CBD1.50per 1,000 sq ftTulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23]
Tulsa, OklahomaConvenience goods retail; all districts other than CBD2.50per 1,000 sq ftTulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23]
Tulsa, OklahomaConvenience goods retail5,000sq ft (none for the first 5,000 sq ft)Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 (Ord. 25429, eff. 12/10/2024)[23]

How a fueling area and a convenience store combine is not verified in our research where a code counts them apart. Where a city's no-minimum area or a state parking law depends on where the site is, the parking requirements lookup asks the location questions.

Truck design vehicles

Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses is not verified in our research, so the calculator shows the dimensions of the vehicle you choose and never picks one.

VehicleDimensionAs storedConditionCitation and editionLabel
SU-30Overall length30.0 ft (overall length)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Width8.0 ft (width)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Height13.5 ft (height)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Front overhang4.0 ft (front overhang)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Rear overhang6.0 ft (rear overhang)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Wheelbase WB120.0 ft (wheelbase WB1)INDOT labels it "SU"INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
SU-30Minimum design turning radius41.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
SU-30Centerline turning radius38.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
SU-30Minimum inside radius28.4 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
SU-40Minimum design turning radius51.2 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
SU-40Centerline turning radius47.4 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
SU-40Minimum inside radius36.4 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-40Overall length45.5 ft (overall length)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Width8.0 ft (width)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Height13.5 ft (height)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Front overhang3.0 ft (front overhang)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Rear overhang2.5 ft (rear overhang)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Wheelbase WB112.5 ft (wheelbase WB1)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Wheelbase WB227.5 ft (wheelbase WB2)INDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-40Minimum design turning radius39.9 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-40Centerline turning radius36.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-40Minimum inside radius19.3 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-62Overall length68.5 ft (overall length)length corroborated by TRB CTBSSP Synthesis 3, Table 2 (secondary), per the packINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-62Minimum design turning radius44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TXTxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-62Centerline turning radius41.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TXTxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-62Minimum inside radius7.4 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 48-ft trailer per 1982 STAA; covers WB-62 and WB-62TXTxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67Overall length73.5 ft (overall length)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Width8.5 ft (width)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Height13.5 ft (height)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Front overhang4.0 ft (front overhang)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Rear overhang4.5 ft (rear overhang)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Wheelbase WB121.6 ft (wheelbase WB1)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Wheelbase WB245.4 ft (wheelbase WB2)INDOT labels it "WB-65", Indiana Design Vehicle; the pack reports length, height and width corroborated against AASHTO 2018 Table 2-4a as reproduced in a secondary sourceINDOT Design Manual Figure 40-4A, archived 2006 English edition[26]agency guidance
WB-67Minimum design turning radius44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAATxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67Centerline turning radius41.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAATxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67Minimum inside radius1.9 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); TxDOT note: 53-ft trailer grandfathered under 1982 STAATxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67DMinimum design turning radius44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67DCenterline turning radius40.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-67DMinimum inside radius19.1 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-92DMinimum design turning radius82.0 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-92DCenterline turning radius78.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-92DMinimum inside radius55.6 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-100TMinimum design turning radius44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-100TCenterline turning radius40.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-100TMinimum inside radius9.7 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-109DMinimum design turning radius59.9 ft (minimum design turning radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-109DCenterline turning radius55.9 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance
WB-109DMinimum inside radius13.8 ft (minimum inside radius)minimum turning path at under 10 mph (AASHTO convention, pack section 1C); the pack lists the three figures in the order of the Table 4-1 columns (design radius / CTR / inside radius)TxDOT RDM Section 4.3.3, Table 4-1, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, online edition[25]agency guidance

Places not verified in our research

For these cities and counties our research holds a row, but none it can show for a gas station, so the calculator lists their local rules as not verified in our research and still gives the state rules and the trips.

  • Mesa, Arizona
  • Tucson, Arizona
  • Fresno, California
  • Long Beach, California
  • Los Angeles, California
  • Oakland, California
  • San Diego, California
  • San Francisco, California
  • San Jose, California
  • Colorado Springs, Colorado
  • Rocky Hill, Connecticut
  • Washington, District of Columbia
  • Jacksonville, Florida
  • Miami, Florida
  • Orlando, Florida
  • Tampa, Florida
  • Atlanta, Georgia
  • Clarkston, Georgia
  • Gwinnett County, Georgia
  • Rome, Georgia
  • Caldwell, Idaho
  • Chicago, Illinois
  • Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Wichita, Kansas
  • Louisville, Kentucky
  • New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Boston, Massachusetts
  • Calvert County, Maryland
  • Gaithersburg, Maryland
  • Montgomery County, Maryland
  • Harper Woods, Michigan
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Kansas City, Missouri
  • Omaha, Nebraska
  • Oakland, New Jersey
  • Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Las Vegas, Nevada
  • New York, New York
  • Columbus, Ohio
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Memphis, Tennessee
  • Nashville, Tennessee
  • Arlington, Texas
  • El Paso, Texas
  • Staunton, Virginia
  • Virginia Beach, Virginia
  • Seattle, Washington
  • Most other US cities and counties

Worked examples

Computed by the calculator's own engine from the rows above when this page was built.

Houston, Texas: the band rate, the TxDOT Houston District trigger, the city parking rows and a delivery vehicle the user chose
State
Texas (TX)
City or county
Houston, TX (tx-houston)
Vehicle fueling positions
8
Convenience store, square feet
3000
Reading
Estimated 147.36 PM peak hour trips (ITE LUC 945); UST program agency TCEQ PST Program (30 TAC Ch. 334); no site area estimated
Trips by the ITE band
8 × 18.42 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) (ITE LUC 945, store 2,000 to 4,000 sq ft) = 147.36 PM peak hour trips
Rate edition and label
ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table; published trip rate
Traffic study, Texas
Stated: no number to compare.
Traffic study, TxDOT Houston District
The PM peak hour estimate of 147.36 trips is below 150 peak-hour trips.
Traffic study, TxDOT Houston District
Not compared: no daily estimate (no LUC 945 daily rate is verified in our research).
Tank program agency
TCEQ PST Program, 30 TAC Ch. 334
Parking, Service station
3.0 per service stall (Service station); plus 1.0 per employee on largest shift (Service station)
Delivery design vehicle chosen
WB-67
Overall length
73.5 ft (overall length)
Width
8.5 ft (width)
Height
13.5 ft (height)
Front overhang
4.0 ft (front overhang)
Rear overhang
4.5 ft (rear overhang)
Wheelbase WB1
21.6 ft (wheelbase WB1)
Wheelbase WB2
45.4 ft (wheelbase WB2)
Minimum design turning radius
44.8 ft (minimum design turning radius)
Centerline turning radius
41.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)
Minimum inside radius
1.9 ft (minimum inside radius)
Site area
No site area: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator does not estimate one.
Not verified in our research
EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Convenience store size and fueling positions by format; Prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store; ITE LUC 945 daily rate; ITE LUC 945 AM peak rate; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, AM peak; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, PM peak; Traffic study trigger, TxDOT Houston District: minor study; Traffic study trigger, Houston, TX; Turn-lane warrant, Texas: right turn, deceleration; Turn-lane warrant, Texas: right turn, acceleration; Parking minimum: the convenience store component; Parking maximum; Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses;
Palm Beach County, Florida: the county equation beside the ITE band
State
Florida (FL)
City or county
Palm Beach County, FL (fl-palm-beach-county)
Vehicle fueling positions
8
Convenience store, square feet
3000
Reading
Estimated 144.9 PM peak hour trips by the Palm Beach County equation (ITE LUC 945 band: 147.36); UST program agency not verified in our research; no site area estimated
County equation
Store in thousands of square feet: 3,000 sq ft ÷ 1,000 = 3
County equation
PM peak: 12.3 × 8 VFP + 15.5 × 3 store ksf = 144.9 PM peak hour trips, in and out 50/50
County equation
Daily: 14.3 × 144.9 PM peak hour trips = 2,072.07 daily trips
County equation
AM peak: Use PM, as the county's table states it
Trips by the ITE band
8 × 18.42 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) (ITE LUC 945, store 2,000 to 4,000 sq ft) = 147.36 PM peak hour trips
Rate edition and label
ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table; published trip rate
Tank program agency
Not verified in our research
Site area
No site area: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator does not estimate one.
Not verified in our research
Underground storage tank program agency (Florida); EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Convenience store size and fueling positions by format; Prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store; ITE LUC 945 daily rate; ITE LUC 945 AM peak rate; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, AM peak; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, PM peak; Traffic study trigger, Florida; Turn-lane warrant, Florida: right and left turns; Parking minimum for a gas station with a convenience store; Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses;
Virginia, with no city chosen: the state fire code separations and the study tiers
State
Virginia (VA)
Vehicle fueling positions
12
Convenience store, square feet
4500
Reading
Estimated 273.12 PM peak hour trips (ITE LUC 945); UST program agency not verified in our research; no site area estimated
Trips by the ITE band
12 × 22.76 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) (ITE LUC 945, store 4,000 to 5,500 sq ft) = 273.12 PM peak hour trips
Rate edition and label
ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table; published trip rate
Traffic study, Virginia
Not compared: no daily estimate (no LUC 945 daily rate is verified in our research).
Traffic study, Virginia
Not compared: no daily estimate (no LUC 945 daily rate is verified in our research).
Traffic study, Virginia
The PM peak hour estimate of 273.12 trips reaches 100 peak-hour trips.
Traffic study, Virginia
The PM peak hour estimate of 273.12 trips is below 500 peak-hour trips.
Tank program agency
Not verified in our research
Dispenser to lot lines
10 ft (minimum), 13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)
Dispenser to building openings
5 ft (minimum), 13VAC5-52-280 (IFC Ch. 23 as amended in Virginia)
Smoking and open flames near dispensers
20 ft, IFC 2305.4 (Virginia text)
Dispenser protection near vehicle traffic
6 in concrete island, 13VAC5-52-280
Vapor processing equipment to buildings or lot lines
10 ft, IFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)
Vapor processing equipment to dispensers
20 ft, IFC 2306 (as amended in Virginia)
Delivery design vehicle chosen
WB-40
Overall length
45.5 ft (overall length)
Width
8.0 ft (width)
Height
13.5 ft (height)
Front overhang
3.0 ft (front overhang)
Rear overhang
2.5 ft (rear overhang)
Wheelbase WB1
12.5 ft (wheelbase WB1)
Wheelbase WB2
27.5 ft (wheelbase WB2)
Minimum design turning radius
39.9 ft (minimum design turning radius)
Centerline turning radius
36.0 ft (centerline turning radius, CTR)
Minimum inside radius
19.3 ft (minimum inside radius)
Site area
No site area: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator does not estimate one.
Not verified in our research
Underground storage tank program agency (Virginia); EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Convenience store size and fueling positions by format; Prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store; ITE LUC 945 daily rate; ITE LUC 945 AM peak rate; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, AM peak; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, PM peak; Turn-lane warrant, Virginia: right and left turns; Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses;
Prince George's County, Maryland: the special exception pump separation and frontage
State
Maryland (MD)
City or county
Prince George's County, MD (md-prince-george-s-county)
Vehicle fueling positions
16
Convenience store, square feet
6000
Reading
Estimated 430.4 PM peak hour trips (ITE LUC 945); UST program agency not verified in our research; no site area estimated
Trips by the ITE band
16 × 26.90 trips per vehicle fueling position (VFP) (ITE LUC 945, store 5,500 to 10,000 sq ft) = 430.4 PM peak hour trips
Rate edition and label
ITE Trip Generation, 11th Edition, as republished in the City of Phoenix, OR SDC table; published trip rate
Tank program agency
Not verified in our research
Nearest pump to a lot with a school, playground, library, hospital or residence
300 ft, Prince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)
Street frontage
150 ft of frontage, Prince George's County Zoning Sec. 27-358(a) (special exception)
Site area
No site area: no prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator does not estimate one.
Not verified in our research
Underground storage tank program agency (Maryland); EV charging equipment to dispensers; Canopy clearance; Dispenser island spacing; Convenience store size and fueling positions by format; Prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store; ITE LUC 945 daily rate; ITE LUC 945 AM peak rate; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, AM peak; ITE LUC 945 pass-by share, PM peak; State traffic study trigger (Maryland); State turn-lane warrants (Maryland); Parking minimum for a gas station with a convenience store; Which design vehicle a fuel delivery uses;

What the calculator leaves out

No prototype site area for a gas station or convenience store is verified in our research, so the calculator gives none. The site area follows from the program: the fueling positions, the store, the canopy, the parking, the delivery truck's path and the local separations, which a preliminary site plan lays out before the engineering set.

The tank agency is shown only where our research verified it from the agency's own page. For the other states, and for the fees, installer rules and funds of every state, the calculator says not verified in our research. Canopy clearance and canopy lighting, the spacing of dispenser islands, convenience store sizes by format, and the distance between EV charging equipment and dispensers are not verified in our research either.

Separation rules reported for Montgomery County and Gaithersburg, Maryland; Rome, Clarkston and Gwinnett County, Georgia; Oakland, New Jersey; Staunton, Virginia; Rocky Hill, Connecticut; Harper Woods, Michigan; and Seattle rest on memos, secondary sites, conflicting sources or text that did not match when it was opened. The calculator lists them as not verified in our research rather than showing a distance.

The estimate is a PM peak hour figure before any pass-by reduction. A gas station's busiest hour can fall outside the PM peak, and the band rates are the 11th Edition values as an agency table republishes them. Codes change, and a condition of approval or a reviewer's own analysis can require more than the rows show. The calculator reads every row as researched on October 11, 2026, and a gas station site plan should be checked against the code in force when the application is filed.

Frequently asked questions

How far must a fuel dispenser be from the property line?

Under the International Fire Code, 10 ft or more from lot lines (IFC 2303.1 item 1; NFPA 30A 6.2.1) [17]. Virginia's 13VAC5-52-280 sets dispensing at least 10 ft from adjoining buildable lot lines and 5 ft from building openings [17]. The model code binds only where a state or city has adopted it, so the calculator labels it a model standard.

How far from a school must a gas station be?

In Prince George's County, Maryland, the nearest pump must be 300 ft from any lot with a school, outdoor playground, library, hospital or residence under the gas station special exception, Zoning Sec. 27-358 [20]. Distances reported for other places in our research rest on memos or secondary sources, so the calculator lists them as not verified in our research.

How many trips does a gas station with a convenience store generate?

Under ITE's 11th Edition, as the City of Phoenix, Oregon republishes it, 18.42 PM peak trips per vehicle fueling position for a store of 2,000 to 4,000 sf, 22.76 for 4,000 to 5,500 sf and 26.90 for 5,500 to 10,000 sf [1]. Palm Beach County requires the FDOT equation instead: 12.3 x VFP + 15.5 x (store ksf) PM peak trips [2].

Does a gas station need a traffic impact study?

It depends on the state and the city. Arizona's threshold is 100 or more trips in any one hour [3], Ohio's full TIS starts above 200 peak-hour trips [4], and the TxDOT Houston District calls for a major study at 150 or more peak-hour or 1,500 or more daily trips [8]. The calculator compares its PM peak estimate with each trigger that counts trips in an hour.

Who regulates the underground storage tanks of a new gas station?

A state agency, where EPA has approved the state's program: as of September 2021, 39 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico had approved programs [13]. In Texas it is the TCEQ PST Program under 30 TAC Ch. 334 [14].

How much land does a gas station and c-store need?

No prototype site area is verified in our research, so the calculator does not give one. The area follows from the fueling positions, the store, the parking, the delivery truck's path and the local separations, which the preliminary site plan lays out.

Sources

  1. 1)ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, system development charge table, City of Phoenix, Oregon. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  2. 2)Palm Beach County Trip Generation Rates, Palm Beach County Engineering, Traffic Division. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  3. 3)TGP 240, Traffic Impact Analysis and Statement, Arizona Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  4. 4)State Highway Access Management Manual, Ohio Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  5. 5)Traffic Impact Analysis Administrative Guidelines, August 2022, Virginia Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  6. 6)24VAC30-155-40, Traffic impact analysis requirements, Virginia Administrative Code. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  7. 7)Access Management Manual, engineering study versus traffic impact analysis, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  8. 8)Houston District Traffic Study Guidelines, Texas Department of Transportation, Houston District. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  9. 9)TIA Checklist Instructions, 7-21-2017, North Carolina Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  10. 10)Regulations for Driveway and Encroachment Control, Chapter 4, Georgia Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  11. 11)2 CCR 601-1, State Highway Access Code, Colorado Secretary of State, Code of Colorado Regulations. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  12. 12)TGP 245, Turn Lane Warrants, Arizona Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  13. 13)List of States With Approved UST Programs and Respective Federal Register Notices, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  14. 14)Petroleum storage tanks: am I regulated?, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  15. 15)UST facility owners, Georgia Environmental Protection Division. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  16. 16)Notification and Fees, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Underground Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  17. 17)13VAC5-52-280, IFC Chapter 23 Motor Fuel-Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, Virginia Administrative Code. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  18. 18)Fuel dispensing operations, code requirements handout. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  19. 19)REM-41, additional operating requirements for unattended facilities (2025), New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  20. 20)Zoning Sec. 27-358, Gas station (special exception), Prince George's County, Maryland. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  21. 21)Zoning Ordinance Sec. 623, Commercial C-2 District, Intermediate Commercial, City of Phoenix, Arizona. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  22. 22)Code of Ordinances Sec. 26-492, parking spaces for certain types of use classifications, City of Houston, Planning and Development Department. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  23. 23)Tulsa Zoning Code Sec. 55.020, Table 55-1 as amended by Ord. 25429, Tulsa Planning Office. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  24. 24)Code of Ordinances Ch. 295, s. 295-403, Table 295-403-2-a, City of Milwaukee. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  25. 25)Roadway Design Manual, 4.3.3 Control Vehicles, Table 4-1, Texas Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  26. 26)Design Manual Figure 40-4A, Design Vehicle Dimensions (archived 2006 English edition), Indiana Department of Transportation. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  27. 27)Alabama Department of Environmental Management ALABAMA UNDERGROUND AND. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  28. 28)Registration, Fees, and Financial Assurance. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  29. 29)ownership and operation. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  30. 30)Financial Responsibility - Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  31. 31)Updated May 2025 Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  32. 32)Administrative Services Section - Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  33. 33)Storage Tank Division. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  34. 34)Underground Storage Tank Financial Responsibility. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  35. 35)Underground Storage Tanks. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  36. 36)Financial Responsibility Requirements - NC DEQ. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  37. 37)25 Pa. Code Chapter 245. Administration Of The Storage Tank And Spill Prevention Program. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  38. 38)RI.gov: DEM Underground Storage Tank Registration - State of Rhode Island. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  39. 39)S.C. Code 44-2 (SUPERB); R.61-98. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  40. 40)Utah UST Certificate of Compliance - Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed 2026-10-09.
  41. 41)UST Newsletter. Accessed 2026-10-10.
  42. 42)MOTOR FUEL-DISPENSING FACILITIES AND REPAIR .... Accessed 2026-10-10.
  43. 43)Sec. 6.14 / Traffic Impact Analysis 6.14.1 / Purpose. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  44. 44)Napa Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  45. 45)city of frederick. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  46. 46)MnDOT Access Management Manual, Ch. 5. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  47. 47)18.31.6.16 NMAC. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  48. 48)Indian Trail TIA Policy, amended Oct. 22, 2024. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  49. 49)Sec. 14-366. - Traffic impact analysis (TIA).. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  50. 50)policies-and-procedures-for-transportation-impact-studies- .... Accessed 2026-10-11.
  51. 51)Article VII: Traffic Impact Studies - Borough of Denver, PA. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  52. 52)CHAPTER 17 ACCESS MANAGEMENT General 17-3 Permit Procedures 17-3. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  53. 53)TRAFFIC DESIGN MANUAL Traffic Operations Division Traffic Engineering Office. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  54. 54)Austin Transportation & Public Works. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  55. 55)CITY OF BROWNSVILLE Traffic & Design Guidelines Page 1 of 7. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  56. 56)940.9 Auxiliary Acceleration and Turning Lanes - Engineering Policy Guide. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  57. 57)Tennessee Department of Transportation Highway System Access Manual (HSAM). Accessed 2026-10-11.
  58. 58)Auxiliary Lanes. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  59. 59)C20-2023-039 1 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  60. 60)City of Baltimore - File #: 25-0065. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  61. 61)Denver Zoning Code Modernizing Parking Requirements text amendment. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  62. 62)191310. Accessed 2026-10-11.
  63. 63)Raleigh TC-11-21. Accessed 2026-10-12.
  64. 64)ORDINANCE 2025-0007 Adopted by the Sacramento City Council April 8, 2025. Accessed 2026-10-11.

Rules as researched on October 11, 2026. Each row of the table carries its own date.

Start a project with these numbers

Send the site and the program. The studio reads your inputs and the result above with the brief, and replies to scope the preliminary site plan.