Explore the map
- Statutory review deadline verified in our research
- Some rules verified; the decision period is not verified in our research
- Not verified in our research
State boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 Cartographic Boundary Files. Boundaries are generalized for small-scale display and show no legal boundary. The map covers the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
How the map reads a state
A review deadline, often called a shot clock, is the time a statute gives a local government to act on an application. The map shades a state when our research verified at least one such clock from the statute or an official text, and it lists every clock it holds for that state, each under the name of the application it covers. A state with several clocks lists each one, never a single figure for the state. Florida, for one, gives a city 120 days after an application is deemed complete, or 180 days if a quasi-judicial or public hearing is required [1], and a separate clock runs for building plan review: 30 business days for residential and listed trades under 7,500 sq ft, 60 business days for signs and certain nonresidential buildings, and 12 business days for a master-permit site-specific permit [2]. All of those rows sit under Florida on the map, side by side.
The title of each shaded state reads its decision periods, rule by rule, and the panel beside the map adds the rest of each row our research verified: what starts the clock, the kind of day counted and what follows a missed deadline. A state with no verified clock reads not verified in our research. The filter picks out the states whose verified clocks count calendar days, business days, or calendar days with holidays left out, so a reader can see at a glance which rules need a holiday calendar. Most clocks attach to a formal application, not a concept review, which is why the difference between a preliminary and a final site plan matters before the first filing.
Where each clock starts
Most of the clocks on the map start on a completeness determination, not on the filing date. Washington gives 65 days with no public notice, 100 days with public notice and 170 days with notice and a hearing, counted from the determination of completeness, and these tiers apply from Jan. 1, 2025 [3]. Oregon gives 120 days after an application is deemed complete, and 150 days for some county applications [4]; the shortest applicable period governs, so an affordable housing application or an expedited land division can have a shorter one, which the map does not show. Minnesota's 60 days run from receipt of a complete written request, including the fee [5]. A preliminary site plan that answers the checklist on the first submission reaches that start sooner.
A few clocks run from another event. A Texas plat is decided within 30 days of filing, and the governing body has a further 30 days when the city ordinance requires approval by both the planning commission and the governing body [6]. Virginia counts 40 days from official submission for the initial review of a site plan or plat on commercial or residential parcels, 30 days for a resubmission, and 20 days after all state agency approvals [7]. Pennsylvania counts 90 days from the next regular meeting after filing, and if that meeting is more than 30 days out, 90 days from the 30th day after filing; the written decision follows within 15 days [8]. The Texas and Pennsylvania state pages set the local approval path around these clocks.
Each clock counts the kind of day its statute names. Calendar days run straight through weekends and holidays, as in Virginia's 40 days [7]. Business days skip Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, as in North Carolina's 15 business days for the initial review of residential building plans [9]. Kansas counts weekends toward the 60 days for a single-family building permit, and federal or state holidays do not count [10]. Arizona leaves the time frames to each city: A.R.S. 9-835 makes the city set its substantive and overall time frames and publish them [11].
When a deadline is missed
The map shows each consequence as the statute words it, step by step. A Texas plat the city does not act on is deemed approved, and the city must issue a certificate on request [6]; a third-party review is available if there is no action by day 15 after the deadline [12]. Pennsylvania deems a plat or land development plan approved under section 508(3) [8], and Minnesota deems a zoning request approved [5]. California deems an ADU permit approved when a complete application is not decided within 60 days [13].
Other states give the applicant a remedy instead. In Virginia a missed initial review leads, after 10 days' written notice, to a petition in circuit court, while a missed resubmission deadline means the plan is deemed approved [7]. Oregon's remedy is mandamus to compel approval under ORS 227.179 [4]. North Carolina lets the applicant elect an independent third-party review of commercial and multifamily sealed plans when the 45 days are missed, and the local government must then act and refund or waive plan review and permit fees [14]. Who answers the deficiency letters that stop these clocks is covered in who prepares a site plan.
Fee refunds sit with the consequences. Florida refunds 100% of the application fee when a city decides 31 or more days after the deadline [1], and its building plan review fee is reduced 10% per business day late unless a timely written deficiency notice was sent [2]. Washington refunds 10% of the fee when the time from the deadline to the decision did not exceed 20 percent of the original time period, and 20% when it did, and a jurisdiction that adopts 3 measures under RCW 36.70B.160 owes no refund [3]. The Florida and Washington state pages carry these statutes into their site plan rules.
The rules by state
Our research verified the statutory review deadlines of 12 states, and other rows, without it, for Arizona; each row is cited to the document it comes from. The other 37 states and the District of Columbia are marked not verified in our research, and none of them is shaded, counted or labelled from a withheld row. Rules as researched on October 11, 2026.
| State | On the map | Verified rows, each cited | Not verified in our research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Alaska | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Arizona | Some rules verified; the decision period is not verified in our research | Site plan, plat, building permit and other licenses (city) Local time frames Locally set substantive and overall time frames, which must be published[11] A.R.S. 9-835 | Site plan, plat, building permit and other licenses (city): If the deadline is missed |
| Arkansas | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| California | Statutory review deadline verified in our research | ADU permit | Discretionary development permits (site plan, tentative map): Decision period; Discretionary development permits (site plan, tentative map): If the deadline is missed; Post-entitlement building permits (two-thirds residential): Decision period; Post-entitlement building permits (two-thirds residential): Days counted; Post-entitlement building permits (two-thirds residential): Clock starts; Post-entitlement building permits (two-thirds residential): If the deadline is missed |
| Colorado | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Connecticut | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Delaware | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| District of Columbia | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Florida | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days; Business days | Site plan, plat, rezoning and other development permits or orders (city) Site plan, plat, rezoning and other development permits or orders (county) Decision period 180 days (a quasi-judicial or public hearing is required (as in 166.033))[16] Fla. Stat. 125.022 Building permit plan review Decision period 30 business days (residential and listed trades under 7,500 sq ft)[2] Fla. Stat. 553.792 If the deadline is missed no reduction if a timely written deficiency notice is sent[2] Fla. Stat. 553.792 | Site plan, plat, rezoning and other development permits or orders (city): Refund |
| Georgia | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Land disturbance permit (site development) Decision period 45 days (initial submission)[17] SB 447 (2026), O.C.G.A. 12-7-9(c), in force from July 1, 2026 | Land disturbance permit (site development): Clock starts; Land disturbance permit (site development): If the deadline is missed; Plat, site plan, rezoning, building permit: Decision period |
| Hawaii | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Idaho | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Illinois | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Indiana | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Iowa | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Kansas | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days, holidays not counted | Single-family building permit Days counted weekends count toward the 60 days and federal or state holidays do not[10] HB 2088 (2025), Fast-Track Permits Act | |
| Kentucky | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Louisiana | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Maine | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Maryland | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Massachusetts | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Michigan | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Minnesota | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Rezoning, CUP, variance and other zoning requests | Preliminary or final plat: Decision period |
| Mississippi | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Missouri | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Montana | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Nebraska | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Nevada | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| New Hampshire | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| New Jersey | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| New Mexico | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| New York | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| North Carolina | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days; Business days | Building permit, residential Building permit, commercial and multifamily sealed plans Clock starts Complete application[14] N.C.G.S. 160D-1110.1 (SL 2023-142), in force from October 1, 2023 If the deadline is missed Applicant may elect independent third-party review[14] N.C.G.S. 160D-1110.1 (SL 2023-142), in force from October 1, 2023 If the deadline is missed the local government must then act and refund or waive plan review and permit fees[14] N.C.G.S. 160D-1110.1 (SL 2023-142), in force from October 1, 2023 | Site plan, plat, rezoning: Decision period |
| North Dakota | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Ohio | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Oklahoma | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Oregon | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Permits, limited land use, zone change (quasi-judicial) Decision period 120 days (a city application (ORS 227.178), or a county application inside an urban growth boundary or for mineral aggregate (ORS 215.427); the shortest applicable period governs, and an application for the development of affordable housing or for an expedited land division has a shorter period, not computed here)[19] ORS 227.178 (cities); ORS 215.427 (counties) Decision period 150 days (a county application outside an urban growth boundary (ORS 215.427(1)(a)))[20] ORS 227.178 (cities); ORS 215.427 (counties) If the deadline is missed Mandamus to compel approval (ORS 227.179)[19] ORS 227.178 (cities); ORS 215.427 (counties) | Permits, limited land use, zone change (quasi-judicial): If the deadline is missed |
| Pennsylvania | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Preliminary plat, final plat, land development (site) plan | Rezoning; building permit: Decision period |
| Rhode Island | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| South Carolina | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| South Dakota | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Tennessee | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | Development plan or site plan (administrative): Decision period; Development plan or site plan (administrative): If the deadline is missed; Subdivision plat: Decision period |
| Texas | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Preliminary and final plat (city) Decision period 30 days (the city ordinance requires approval by both the planning commission and the governing body)[6] Tex. Loc. Gov't Code 212.009, 212.0091, in force from September 1, 2023 If the deadline is missed Deemed approved[6] Tex. Loc. Gov't Code 212.009, 212.0091, in force from September 1, 2023 If the deadline is missed city must issue a certificate on request (212.009(d))[6] Tex. Loc. Gov't Code 212.009, 212.0091, in force from September 1, 2023 If the deadline is missed Third-party review if no action by day 15 after the deadline (Ch. 247)[12] Tex. Loc. Gov't Code 247.002(a) (HB 14, 88th Legislature, R.S.), in force from September 1, 2023 Site plan Decision period HB 3699 struck "[plan or]", so the 30-day deadline applies to plats only[6] Tex. Loc. Gov't Code 212.009 (as amended by HB 3699), in force from September 1, 2023 | Plat (county): Decision period; Rezoning: Decision period; Building permit: Decision period; Building permit: Days counted; Building permit: Clock starts; Building permit: If the deadline is missed |
| Utah | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Vermont | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Virginia | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Plat, site plan, plan of development (commercial or residential parcels) If the deadline is missed Initial miss: after 10 days' written notice, petition circuit court (15.2-2259(C))[7] Va. Code 15.2-2259(A)(2)-(3) Plat (other parcels) Preliminary plat | Preliminary plat: If the deadline is missed; Rezoning; building permit: Decision period |
| Washington | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Project permits including site plan, plat and building (GMA jurisdictions) Decision period 65 days (no public notice)[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 Decision period 100 days (public notice required)[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 Decision period 170 days (public notice and a hearing required)[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 Clock starts Determination of completeness[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 Refund 10% (the time from the deadline to the final decision did not exceed 20 percent of the original time period)[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 Refund 20% (the overrun exceeded 20 percent of the original time period)[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 No refund No refund if the jurisdiction adopts 3 measures under 36.70B.160[3] RCW 36.70B.080, 36.70B.070, in force from January 1, 2025 | Rezoning (legislative): Decision period |
| West Virginia | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Wisconsin | Not verified in our research | Not verified in our research | |
| Wyoming | Statutory review deadline verified in our research Calendar days | Building permit for a dwelling Decision period 30 days[21] HB 2 (2026), Fast Track Permits Act, W.S. 16-13-102, in force from July 1, 2026 Clock starts Completed application submitted[21] HB 2 (2026), Fast Track Permits Act, W.S. 16-13-102, in force from July 1, 2026 Days counted calendar[21] HB 2 (2026), Fast Track Permits Act, W.S. 16-13-102, in force from July 1, 2026 If the deadline is missed Deemed approved the day after the deadline[21] HB 2 (2026), Fast Track Permits Act, W.S. 16-13-102, in force from July 1, 2026 |
States not verified in our research
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arkansas
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Utah
- Vermont
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
Embed the map
The map can be framed on another site. The frame shows the map, the state table with its sources and the research date, and links back to this page.
Worked examples
Computed by the map's own engine from the rows above when this page was built: the reading of one state, as the map, its title and the details panel give it.
- State
- FL,
- On the map
- Filter
- Title of the state on the map
- Not verified in our research
- State
- GA,
- On the map
- Filter
- Title of the state on the map
- Not verified in our research
What the map leaves out
The map holds only clocks our research verified from the statute or an official text, the same standard as the site plan pages, and it says not verified in our research for the rest. Tennessee holds rules in the research that our research did not verify, so the table names them without a value and the map leaves the state unshaded; Georgia shows the initial review period of its land disturbance permit clock and the kind of day it counts, while what starts that clock and what a missed deadline means read not verified in our research. A rule whose official text did not match the summary we started from is left out until the difference is settled, as Florida's 50 percent refund tier is.
Statutes also stop or extend time, for example while the applicant answers a request for more information or asks for a written extension. The map shows the decision period as the statute states it, so the deadline that binds a local government can be later than the period alone suggests. A deadline that lands on a weekend or a holiday can move under the state's own computation rule.
City review targets are not statutory deadlines, and a site plan consultant plans around both. Dallas, for one, publishes its goals to communicate review timelines, not permit issuance timelines, and a missed target has no legal consequence [15]. Rules change, and each row carries its effective date where the statute states one: Washington's tiers apply from January 1, 2025 [3], and Kansas added its 60-day clock in 2025 [10]. The map reads every clock as researched on October 11, 2026.
Frequently asked questions
Which states have a statutory deadline for a site plan?
Among the states our research verified, Florida gives a city 120 days after an application is deemed complete, or 180 days with a quasi-judicial or public hearing [1]. Washington gives 65, 100 or 170 days by the notice and hearing a permit needs [3]. Virginia gives 40 days for an initial site plan review and 30 days for a resubmission [7]. In Texas, HB 3699 removed site plans from the 30-day plat clock [6].
Does a missed deadline mean the plan is approved?
Only where the statute says so. A Texas plat is deemed approved when the city misses the 30 days [6], and Minnesota deems a zoning request approved after 60 days [5]. In Virginia a missed initial review leads to a circuit court petition after 10 days' written notice, while a missed resubmission deadline means the plan is deemed approved [7]. Oregon's remedy is mandamus to compel approval under ORS 227.179 [4].
Do the days include weekends and holidays?
Which states refund fees when a review runs late?
Florida refunds 100% of the fee when a city decides 31 or more days late [1]. Washington refunds 10% when the overrun does not exceed 20 percent of the original time period, and 20% when it does [3]. North Carolina refunds 10% of the total permit fee per business day after day 20, up to 10 business days, on a residential building permit [9].
Sources
- 1)Fla. Stat. 166.033, Development permits and orders (2025 Florida Statutes), Florida Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 2)Fla. Stat. 553.792, Building permit application to local government, Florida Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 3)RCW 36.70B.080, Development regulations: requirements, report, time periods for permit decisions, Washington State Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 4)LUBA headnotes 25.3.5, Local Government Procedures, Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 5)Minn. Stat. 15.99, Time deadline for agency action (2025), Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 6)Texas HB 3699 (88th Legislature), enrolled, Texas Legislature Online. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 7)Va. Code 15.2-2259, Designated agent to act on proposed final plat, Virginia General Assembly. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 8)Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247 of 1968), 2022 compilation, section 508, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 9)N.C.G.S. 160D-1110, Building permits, North Carolina General Assembly. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 10)Kansas HB 2088 (2025), enrolled: the Fast-Track Permits Act, Kansas Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 11)A.R.S. 9-835, Licensing time frames; compliance; consequence for failure to comply with time frame; exemption, Arizona Legislature. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 12)Texas HB 14 (88th Legislature), enrolled, Texas Legislature Online. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 13)ADU Handbook update, California Department of Housing and Community Development. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 14)N.C.G.S. 160D-1110.1, Commercial and multifamily building plan review, North Carolina General Assembly. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 15)Service First Bulletin 301, City of Dallas, Development Services. Accessed 2026-10-11.
- 16)Fla. Stat. 125.022. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 17)Georgia SB 447. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 18)Va. Code 15.2-2260. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 19)ORS 227.178 and 227.179. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 20)ORS 227.178 and 227.179. Accessed 2026-10-12.
- 21)Wyoming HB 2. Accessed 2026-10-12.
Rules as researched on October 11, 2026. Each row of the table carries its own date.
Start a project with these numbers
Send the site and the program. The studio reads your inputs and the result above with the brief, and replies to scope the preliminary site plan.