top of page

US Chain Restaurant Industry Outlook 2025–2030

  • Writer: Alketa
    Alketa
  • Sep 15
  • 27 min read

Executive Summary


The US chain restaurant sector (full-service chains with 5+ locations) has rebounded strongly from the pandemic, but operators now face a more challenging environment going into 2025. Industry revenue surpassed pre-COVID levels amid surging post-lockdown demand and menu price inflation, reaching an estimated $241.5 billion in 2025. However, high food and labor costs coupled with cautious consumer spending have begun to squeeze margins – industry profit is only about 4.7% of sales in 2025. Many chains raised menu prices or reduced portion sizes to offset historic inflation in 2022, but this in turn has dampened customer traffic. The result is a slight revenue dip of ~1.7% in 2025 after two years of robust recovery.


Looking ahead, moderate growth is expected through 2030 as the industry adjusts to a mature, post-pandemic landscape. IBISWorld projects chain restaurant sales will expand at a 1.8% CAGR to approximately $264.5 billion by 2030. Several strategic themes will define this next chapter:

  • Maximizing Efficiency and Technology: Chains are investing in automation, data analytics, and AI to streamline operations and mitigate labor shortages. From AI-driven scheduling and inventory management to digital ordering platforms, technology adoption is helping boost productivity and enhance guest service.

  • Menu and Pricing Optimization: Operators are engineering menus for profitability, trimming low-margin items and focusing on core cuisines. Menu simplification has gained traction as a way to cut costs and improve consistency. Meanwhile, strategic price adjustments and value promotions aim to balance margin needs with value-sensitive consumers in an inflationary environment.

  • Evolving Consumer Preferences: Chains are responding to diners’ heightened demand for healthy, sustainable, and locally sourced options. Sustainability has become a key differentiator, alongside growth in off-premise dining (delivery/takeout now accounts for a large share of sales) and interest in experiences that justify dining out. Brands emphasizing social responsibility, personalization (loyalty apps, etc.), and experiential dining are winning loyalty.

  • Competitive Positioning and Expansion: The competitive landscape remains fragmented and highly competitive, but chain operators are capitalizing on opportunities created by the pandemic shake-out. With many independent restaurants having closed (over 10% of U.S. restaurants shut permanently due to COVID-19 disruptions), well-capitalized chains have been able to grab market share. Major players are expanding cautiously – often through franchising for capital efficiency – and even exploring international markets to counter a saturated domestic market. Mergers and acquisitions continue (e.g. Darden’s recent acquisitions) as chains seek scale and new concepts.


Overall, the US chain restaurant sector is entering a slower growth, operationally intensive period. Success from 2025 to 2030 will hinge on controlling costs (labor, food, rent) while innovating through tech and menu strategy to meet changing consumer expectations. Those chains that can streamline operations, deliver strong value and experiences, and adapt nimbly to economic headwinds are positioned to thrive in the next five years.


Market Overview


Market Size & Growth: The chain full-service restaurant industry has grown substantially in the past few years, buoyed by recovery from the pandemic’s impacts. In 2025, industry revenue is about $241.5 billion, representing vigorous growth from the 2020 low point. Over the five years to 2025, chain restaurant sales expanded at an average annual rate of ~10% – a figure amplified by the rebound from 2020’s downturn. This recovery trajectory included outsized gains in 2021–2022 as dining rooms reopened and consumers eagerly returned, followed by a leveling off in 2023–2024 as inflation tempered demand. Figure 1 illustrates this trend: after a steep drop in 2020, sales surpassed pre-pandemic levels by 2022 and peaked around 2024 before a slight dip in 2025. IBISWorld forecasts modest growth going forward, with revenue reaching roughly $264.5 billion by 2030 (about +1.8% CAGR from 2025) – essentially aligning with population and inflation trends rather than the double-digit surges of the immediate recovery period.


Industry Composition: The “chain restaurant” sector as defined by IBISWorld covers full-service restaurants with wait staff that operate as part of a chain/franchise with five or more units. As of 2025 there are about 143,000 chain restaurant establishments across the country employing roughly 3 million workers. This averages to ~21 employees per restaurant, reflecting the labor-intensive nature of full-service dining (many staff are part-time). Chain restaurants range from casual dining brands (e.g. Applebee’s) to upscale polished casual concepts (e.g. Seasons 52) – but all share standardized menus and formats under multi-unit operations. Importantly, this segment excludes independent local restaurants and most limited-service/fast food chains. For context, chains account for a significant portion of the overall full-service dining market; their post-pandemic growth was aided by independents’ struggles, with chains capturing business from some shuttered local eateries.


Segment Breakdown: Chain restaurants can be segmented by cuisine and service style. The dominant segment is “American” cuisine, which includes traditional American grill and bar concepts – burgers, steaks, ribs, salads, and similar fare. This segment appeals to the broadest market and has driven much of the industry’s growth over decades. Major “American” chain brands (often classified as varied menu or family style) include the likes of Applebee’s, Chili’s, Texas Roadhouse, and Cheesecake Factory, which collectively make up the largest share of chain restaurant revenue. The next significant segment is Italian/Pizza chains, led by operators like Olive Garden, Carrabba’s, and full-service pizzeria chains – reflecting Americans’ enduring appetite for Italian cuisine. Seafood chains (e.g. Red Lobster and others focusing on fish/seafood) form a smaller niche but are notable in coastal regions. Another category often cited by industry analysts is “Varied Menu” chains – brands that offer a broad, eclectic menu rather than a single cuisine focus. These include concept restaurants like Cheesecake Factory or BJ’s Restaurant & Brewhouse, which serve everything from pasta to steaks to tacos. (Many of these could also be grouped under American, but the “varied menu” label highlights their extensive offerings.) In general, American-style concepts account for the largest slice of industry revenue (likely well over 50%), followed by Italian/pizza and varied-menu chains, with seafood-themed restaurants and other specialty cuisines trailing in market share. It’s worth noting that international cuisines (such as Mexican, Chinese, Japanese, etc.) represent a relatively small portion of full-service chain sales – though growing – often concentrated in certain regions (for instance, Tex-Mex chains have a strong presence in the Southwest). American casual dining’s cultural ubiquity has given it the widest appeal nationally.


Geographic Concentration: Chain restaurants are pervasive across the United States, but activity is heaviest in high-population states and tourist hubs. Not surprisingly, California, Texas, Florida, New York, and other populous states generate a large share of chain restaurant revenue simply due to their sheer number of locations and diners. For example, major chains consistently report their highest unit counts in California, Texas, and Florida – indicating these states’ outsized role in the industry. The Sun Belt and Southeast (e.g. Florida, Texas, Georgia) are especially dense with franchised casual dining outlets, partly due to favorable demographics and a dining-out culture. Tourism and travel corridors also boost chain restaurant concentration: Florida’s Orlando/Miami tourism, Nevada’s Las Vegas market, and highway-heavy states see above-average chain presence (national brands catering to travelers). By contrast, some less populated rural states host fewer chain units (and those markets rely more on independent diners). Overall, the distribution of chain restaurants broadly follows population patterns, but certain regional tastes influence local mix. IBISWorld notes that border regions often feature higher concentrations of chains serving international or ethnic cuisines in response to local cultural influences – for instance, Mexican-themed casual chains are ubiquitous in the Southwest (near the Mexican border), while some Canadian border states might see more concepts catering to cross-border visitors. In summary, chain restaurants are truly nationwide, with slight regional tilts: the South and West have a heavy footprint of big-box casual dining, the Midwest embraces family-style chains, and coastal urban centers mix chains with local concepts. Despite those nuances, virtually every U.S. metro area has a roster of familiar chain restaurant names, reflecting the industry’s broad geographic reach.


Market Growth Drivers & Trends: Several factors underlie the current market dynamics. Through 2021–2023, pent-up consumer demand for dining out was a major growth driver as COVID restrictions eased – many chains saw same-store sales surge on the return of dine-in customers. Simultaneously, menu price inflation boosted nominal revenue; menu prices at full-service restaurants were nearly 9% higher at their 2022 peak vs. the prior year (the fastest rise in decades), which inflated sales figures even as traffic counts in some cases remained below 2019 levels. That high inflation, however, also became a headwind by squeezing consumers’ discretionary budgets – leading some diners to cut back frequency in 2023–2024 despite higher menu prices. Offsetting these pressures, chain restaurants benefited from their ability to adapt: widespread implementation of online ordering, curbside pickup, and delivery during the pandemic has opened new revenue streams. Off-premise dining now constitutes a significant portion of sales (over 70% of restaurant traffic including quick-service, per the National Restaurant Association) – and even full-service chains have leaned into takeout/delivery to supplement in-house dining. Many chains also capitalized on reduced competition as thousands of independent eateries closed; as one analyst noted, the capacity reduction in full-service dining in 2020–2021 (especially among independents) created a scenario where chain casual-dining brands could enjoy a few “golden years” of market share gains as demand rebounded with fewer competitor. Indeed, by 2022–2023, leading chain operators were reporting record sales and improved table turns. However, as of 2025 the market has largely normalized: growth has cooled, and chains must now compete vigorously for customer visits in an environment of slower consumer spending, rising costs, and shifting preferences (e.g. towards healthier menus and convenient service). These themes set the stage for the competitive and financial outlook detailed in the following sections.


Competitive Landscape


The chain restaurant industry is highly competitive and fragmented. No single company dominates the sector; instead, hundreds of chain brands fight for market share, alongside the persistent backdrop of independent restaurants. Industry concentration is low – even the largest player, Darden Restaurants, holds only roughly 5% of total market revenue (Darden’s sales were about $12 billion in 2025 out of the $241+ billion industry). According to IBISWorld, the top four companies combined likely account for well under 15% of industry sales, indicating a very distributed competitive field. This structure means chain restaurants must differentiate themselves on brand, value, and experience to attract customers, as diners have many alternatives (including cooking at home). External competition is intense, not just from other full-service chains but also from independents, fast-casual eateries, meal kits, and other food-at-home options. IBISWorld emphasizes that heavy competition and a “high establishment-to-operator ratio” (many units per company) are defining features of this industry – in other words, major chains operate numerous outlets that directly compete with the numerous outlets of other chains in any given market. This has kept pricing competitive and pressured operators to run efficiently.


Major Players: Despite fragmentation, a handful of companies stand out as leaders. Darden Restaurants, Inc. is the largest full-service chain operator in the U.S., with well-known brands like Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, and Yard House under its umbrella. Darden’s U.S. revenue was about $12 billion in 2025, with a healthy profit margin around 12% (reflecting strong operational efficiency). Other prominent companies include Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. (parent of Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, etc.), Brinker International (Chili’s Grill & Bar and Maggiano’s Little Italy), Dine Brands Global (franchisor of Applebee’s and IHOP), and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (which operates the namesake steakhouse chain and Bubba’s 33). These firms each generate on the order of $3–$5 billion in annual sales from their chains, except Dine Brands which as a franchisor reports smaller corporate revenue but whose franchisees collectively drive large system sales. Also notable is Cheesecake Factory, Inc., which runs the Cheesecake Factory chain and a few upscale concepts. IBISWorld’s report specifically highlights Darden and an upscale niche player, Fogo de Chão, as representative companies. Fogo de Chão (a Brazilian steakhouse chain) is much smaller than Darden but has been growing rapidly; it was recently acquired by private equity firm Bain Capital for $1.1 billion in 2023, underscoring investor interest in growth-oriented chains. Overall, the competitive set ranges from these multi-brand corporations down to regional chains with a few dozen units.


It’s worth mentioning that the COVID-19 pandemic shook up the competitive landscape. Many weaker independent restaurants did not survive the prolonged 2020 closures – an estimated 10% of all U.S. restaurants closed permanently by early 2021, with independent full-service establishments hit hardest. This effectively reduced supply in the marketplace. Chains, with their greater resources and access to capital, largely withstood the crisis (though not without pain – nearly every chain saw sales plummet in 2020 and some smaller chains declared bankruptcy). As a result, by 2022 chains found themselves able to capture pent-up demand and increase market share at the expense of independents. Analysts like Jefferies’ Andy Barish noted that chain casual-dining brands were entering “golden years” around 2022–2024, benefiting from the shake-out and capacity reduction among mom-and-pop competitors. For example, Brinker International (Chili’s) and Bloomin’ Brands (Outback, etc.) were cited as companies poised to grow unit counts and same-store sales faster than pre-pandemic norms because of the altered competitive landscape. This tailwind is fading by 2025 as the market restabilizes and new independents emerge, but chains maintain an advantageous position gained post-COVID.


Franchise vs. Corporate Operation: A key aspect of competition in this sector is the business model – specifically, whether restaurants are franchised or company-operated. Many chain restaurant brands use a franchise model (Applebee’s, IHOP, Denny’s, Red Lobster, etc.), wherein independent owners operate the restaurants under the brand and pay royalties to the franchisor company. Other chains (like Olive Garden/LongHorn under Darden, or Texas Roadhouse) predominantly own and operate their units directly. Each approach has implications for growth and competition. Franchised chains can expand more rapidly with less capital since franchisees invest in new locations – this allows wide geographic reach. For instance, Applebee’s (under Dine Brands) has ~1,600 locations almost entirely franchised, making it one of the most ubiquitous casual dining brands in the country. Franchise-heavy brands compete by leveraging local ownership’s community knowledge while maintaining national marketing and menu consistency. However, franchisors must ensure franchisees uphold quality and may face tensions over pricing and promotions (franchisees’ profitability can be squeezed by mandates from corporate). On the other hand, corporate-run chains like those of Darden or Bloomin’ Brands have tighter central control and can more uniformly implement strategic changes (e.g. tech systems or menu updates), but their growth is constrained by the company’s capital and management bandwidth. In recent years, even traditionally corporate chains have done “refranchising” or international franchising to spur expansion with less capital. Overall, the franchise dynamic remains strong in this industry – many of the largest chains are essentially franchise networks, which creates a competitive focus on attracting franchise investors and securing prime locations as much as on attracting diners. Notably, franchise law and labor regulations can impact the industry’s structure; for example, there is ongoing debate over joint-employer rules (whether franchisors are liable for franchisee labor practices), which could affect how chains manage their franchise systems. Competitive strategies must thus account for not only consumer-facing facets but also the franchisor-franchisee relationships behind the scenes.


Technology and Operational Capabilities: Leading chains are increasingly competing on technology adoption and operational efficiency. Larger chain operators have invested in advanced back-of-house and front-of-house tech that independent competitors often cannot afford at scale. For example, centralized digital ordering platforms, loyalty apps, and delivery integrations have become standard for big chains, allowing them to capture off-premise sales and customer data effectively. Franchisees benefit from the parent chain’s tech infrastructure – IBISWorld notes that chain restaurant franchisees often leverage the franchisor’s back-of-house technology, unified point-of-sale systems, and digital ordering apps to drive efficiency and negotiate better terms on supplies. In practical terms, a chain like Chili’s can roll out handheld order tablets to all its restaurants, speeding up table turns, or Olive Garden can use a single mobile app for takeout orders nationwide – giving them a competitive service edge over independents. Additionally, data analytics and AI tools are giving chains new competitive capabilities. According to industry analyses, restaurants are using AI for everything from demand forecasting and dynamic scheduling to personalized marketing. Chains are integrating systems so that sales, labor, and inventory data all connect in real-time, enabling proactive decisions (like adjusting staffing if sales are below forecast). This level of tech-enabled agility can improve guest experience (shorter waits, fewer stockouts) and profitability. Many chains have also implemented kitchen display systems and automation to reduce errors and speed up food preparation. For instance, kitchen screens have replaced paper tickets in numerous chain kitchens, and some brands are testing robotic kitchen assistants (for prep or fryers) to mitigate labor gaps. Customer-facing tech is another battlefield – tableside ordering tablets, pay-at-table devices, and robust loyalty mobile apps (with offers tailored by AI) are increasingly common in casual dining. The net effect is that technology has become a competitive differentiator: those chains that effectively harness automation and digital tools can operate with lower costs and better consistency, which is a significant advantage in an industry with slim margins. Smaller chains and independents are racing to adopt similar tech, but the scale and resources of the big chains give them a head start.


Operational Benchmarks: In terms of operations, chain restaurants strive to benchmark performance on metrics like table turnover rates, average check size, labor hours per guest, and same-store sales growth. Labor management is a crucial area – turnover among restaurant staff is notoriously high (a persistent challenge for all competitors), so chains compete on employer brand and benefits to keep restaurants staffed. Many are experimenting with flexible scheduling, cross-training, and even wage increases to attract workers in a tight labor market. Some large chains (e.g. Olive Garden) have boasted of lower turnover after improving employee engagement and offering better pay, which in turn boosts service quality. Marketing and loyalty programs are another competitive front: chain restaurants typically run nationwide advertising (TV commercials, social media campaigns) and have loyalty clubs or promotions (e.g. Red Lobster’s rewards, Chili’s rewards) to drive repeat visits – capabilities that independent restaurants find hard to match. Additionally, chains often benefit from economies of scale in procurement and supply chain. They negotiate bulk contracts for food supplies, which during times of inflation can mean relatively lower cost increases than smaller rivals face. This was evident when tariffs and supply disruptions hit certain products – big chains could leverage volume to secure coffee, seafood, or avocados at better prices, or substitute menu items as needed. Nonetheless, recent tariffs on imported foods (like seafood and produce) and other supply chain woes have raised costs for all and become a shared pain point.


In summary, the competitive landscape for US chain restaurants as of 2025 is one where scale and efficiency are king. The major chain companies, while not controlling huge market share percentages individually, collectively set the tone of the industry through aggressive marketing, tech adoption, and nationwide footprints. Smaller regional chains and independent restaurants compete by offering unique concepts or local charm, but they face an uphill battle against the marketing muscle and operational prowess of the chains. Going forward, we expect to see continued consolidation and strategic alliances, as well as new competitors (for example, fast-casual brands moving “upmarket” into polished casual dining, or ghost kitchen brands entering the space). But the incumbents have proven resilient and adaptable, positioning them strongly for the next phase of industry evolution.


Financial Performance Benchmarks


Chain restaurants operate on thin profit margins and a cost structure that requires careful management of expenses. In 2025, the average net profit margin for the industry is around 4–5% of revenue. This modest bottom line is the result of high operating costs – especially for labor and food – that consume the bulk of restaurant revenues.


Cost Structure: A typical chain full-service restaurant spends roughly 65–75% of its revenue on just food and labor costs. Labor is usually the single largest expense, often accounting for about one-third of sales or more. This includes wages for servers, kitchen staff, bartenders, hosts, and managers, plus benefits and payroll taxes. Food and beverage cost of goods sold (COGS) is the next major component – generally 25–35% of revenue on average (though it can reach 40% for some cuisine types, especially if menu prices aren’t adjusted for ingredient inflation). Together, these two cost categories (often referred to as prime costs) make up around two-thirds of total costs. The remaining expenses are “operating overhead”: occupancy (rent, property taxes, utilities), marketing, maintenance, insurance, and administrative costs. Rent and occupancy typically run in the mid-single digits as a percentage of sales (around 6–10%), but can be higher in prime urban locations. Other operating costs (supplies, marketing, tech systems, etc.) might comprise another ~20–25%. When all is tallied, a well-managed chain restaurant aims for an operating profit (EBITDA) in the low teens as a percentage of sales, which after corporate overhead and interest yields the net margins in the mid-single digits. Figure 2 provides an illustrative breakdown of the cost structure for chain restaurants, showing the approximate share of each major cost category.


This tight margin structure means financial benchmarks are closely watched. For example, a 1-2 percentage point increase in food or labor cost as a share of sales can cut profit nearly in half. That is exactly the scenario many chains faced in 2022: surging wages and food prices drove up costs, putting margins under strain. In 2022–2023, nearly 88% of restaurants reported higher labor costs vs. the prior year, and food input inflation hit multi-decade highs (commodities like beef, chicken, and cooking oil saw double-digit price jumps). Chains have responded with a variety of tactics: menu price increases (passing some costs to consumers), menu engineering (altering menus to feature higher-margin items), portion control to reduce waste, and renegotiating supplier contracts. Many operators also trimmed their menus – an underutilized strategy that became more common post-pandemic. By removing labor-intensive or slow-selling items, restaurants can reduce ingredient inventory and complexity, thereby saving on both food waste and kitchen labor. The National Restaurant Association identified “smaller or streamlined menus” as a top trend for 2025, since it helps operators manage costs amid inflation. We’ve seen this play out with chains like Chili’s, which cut about 40% of its menu items a couple years ago to focus on best sellers, and saw improvements in speed and margins. This type of menu simplification, combined with strategic pricing, has quietly helped some chains boost their unit-level profitability even as cost pressures persist.


Labor and Rent Pressures: Labor deserves special mention, as it is not only a cost issue but also an operational one. The industry has been grappling with a labor shortage and rising wage rates. Coming out of the pandemic, many restaurant workers did not return, forcing chains to compete for employees by raising wages and offering bonuses. For instance, it’s not uncommon now to see kitchen starting wages well above minimum wage in many markets, and companies offering referral bonuses or improved benefits. In certain states and localities, minimum wage legislation is mandating higher pay (e.g. California’s recent law setting a $20/hour minimum for larger quick-service restaurants by 2024 – while it targets fast food, it influences the broader wage market as well). According to the NRA, staffing challenges are a top concern for operators in 2025, and labor costs continue to climb across nearly every segment. As a result, labor cost as a % of revenue has edged upward for many chains, putting squeeze on the bottom line. Productivity initiatives (like cross-training staff, using labor management software to better match staffing to demand, etc.) are critical to mitigating these costs. Similarly, rent and occupancy costs have been rising, especially as leases come up for renewal with landlords trying to recoup losses from 2020. Prime locations in shopping centers or tourist areas are seeing rent escalations. On average, rent might be around 7–8% of sales now, up slightly from historical levels. Chains with a lot of legacy locations (e.g. older casual dining formats on large lots) also face costs to remodel or maintain those properties, which adds to capital expenditure needs. Some chains have downsized certain units or relocated to lower-rent areas to reduce occupancy expenses. Another tactic is improving unit economics – for example, adding more seating or boosting takeout orders to generate more sales per square foot, effectively diluting fixed costs like rent. A positive note is that interest rates (for those leasing or financing equipment) have risen, making cost of capital higher, so efficient use of space and capital has become even more important.


Menu Pricing Strategies: In the face of cost pressures, chain restaurants have been very deliberate with pricing strategy. Menu prices in full-service restaurants have been rising faster than general inflation for the past couple of years. At one point in late 2022, full-service menu prices were about 9% higher year-over-year – the fastest increase in decades. These price hikes were a direct response to input cost inflation (food, labor, energy). However, menu pricing is a double-edged sword: raise prices too much and you deter price-sensitive customers, especially when grocery prices rise slower. Indeed, throughout 2023–2024, restaurant price inflation outpaced grocery inflation, contributing to some traffic declines as value-conscious diners cut back. Chains have thus tried other approaches: “shrinkflation”, or reducing portion sizes subtly while keeping prices the same, has been one method (e.g. slightly smaller steaks or one less mozzarella stick per appetizer, which many customers might not notice). Additionally, many brands introduced or expanded value deals and promotions to keep budget-minded guests coming. For example, Olive Garden brought back its Never-Ending Pasta Bowl at a discounted price for a limited time in 2022; Chili’s has its “3 for Me” affordable meal combos; and Applebee’s often advertises two entrees and an appetizer for a set price. The NRA identified “value deals/propositions” as a key trend for 2025, reflecting operators’ need to provide bang-for-buck as consumers deal with inflation’s after-effects. At the same time, chains don’t want to train customers only to come for discounts, so it’s a fine balance. Increasingly, data-driven menu engineering is helping set prices – sophisticated tools analyze item profitability and customer preference to guide which prices to raise and which items to feature or cut. Some restaurants are also testing dynamic pricing (adjusting prices by daypart or demand, akin to happy hour specials extended in new ways). For now, as inflation has begun to ease (full-service menu prices were up ~3.7% year-on-year in early 2025, down from the peak growth rate), most chains are aiming for a “return to normal” pricing cadence – about 2–3% annual menu price increases, which is more in line with historical norms. The focus is on driving guest traffic back up: many operators have publicly stated they will be cautious with further price hikes, since they recognize the need to win back any customers lost due to 2022’s pricing moves.


Capital Efficiency & Investments: From a financial perspective, chain restaurant companies pay close attention to returns on capital for new units and improvements. Building and opening a new full-service restaurant is expensive – a mid-range casual dining restaurant can cost $500,000 to $1 million (or more) to open when factoring in build-out, kitchen equipment, furniture, etc. High-end concepts can exceed $2–3 million per location to develop. Such capital intensity means that companies are judicious about expansion and often prefer franchising to share the capital burden. Franchising is inherently a capital-efficient growth model: the franchisor (corporate) outlays relatively little capital, while franchisees invest their own funds to open restaurants, paying fees in return. This model has enabled faster unit growth for brands like IHOP and Applebee’s post-recession, for example. For franchisors, key financial metrics are franchise revenue (royalties) growth and franchisee unit economics (franchisees must be profitable to continue opening stores). For chains that are company-operated, metrics like cash-on-cash return per new restaurant and payback period are monitored. Many chains target around a 2–3 year payback on new units in attractive markets. Capital expenditures have also been directed toward technology (as discussed, e.g. new POS systems, kitchen tech) which, while costly upfront, are aimed at reducing ongoing labor or waste costs. Additionally, some chains have pursued asset-light strategies, such as sale-leaseback transactions for their real estate (selling restaurant properties to investors and leasing them back) to free up cash. Overall, the industry is in a phase where maintaining capital discipline is crucial – after the upheaval of the pandemic, investors and operators alike are favoring strategies that improve capital efficiency (like franchising, smaller restaurant prototypes, ghost kitchens for delivery, etc.) over aggressive debt-fueled expansion. As evidence of financial resilience, a recent survey indicated over 80% of restaurant operators expect their sales in 2025 to be the same or higher than 2024, suggesting cautious optimism. But to turn those sales into profit, controlling costs and smart deployment of capital will remain the name of the game.


Industry Outlook (2025–2030)


The outlook for the US chain restaurant industry over the next five years (2025–2030) is cautiously optimistic, with moderate growth tempered by several risk factors. Following the post-pandemic boom and subsequent stabilization, the industry is entering a mature phase where expansion will likely track broader economic trends. Here are the key elements of the forecast outlook:


Growth Projections: Industry analysts project that chain full-service restaurants will achieve low single-digit annual growth in revenue through 2030. IBISWorld forecasts the market will grow from $241.5 billion in 2025 to about $264.5 billion in 2030, an average annual growth of ~1.8%. This growth will be driven partly by modest increases in unit counts (new restaurant openings) and partly by inflationary increases in menu prices. We do not anticipate a return to the heady 10%+ growth rates seen during the 2021–2022 recovery; instead, growth will likely be in the 2–4% range most years, assuming no major economic shocks. There may be some pent-up tailwinds early in the period if consumer spending power improves (for instance, if inflation continues to cool and real incomes rise, consumers might dine out slightly more). Pent-up demand for experiences (travel, dining) among younger demographics could also provide a bump. However, those positives are balanced by a few chains closing underperforming units or slowing expansion in saturated markets, which could hold back net growth. It’s important to note that while overall dollar sales are expected to rise gradually, traffic (guest counts) has been a concern – the industry has seen traffic declines for several years (even pre-COVID, casual dining visits were slowly eroding). The outlook assumes traffic stabilizes or improves marginally as chains adapt, but much of the sales growth may come from incremental pricing and increased takeout/delivery sales rather than a big surge in dine-in customer counts.


Risk Factors: The industry faces a number of risk factors and challenges that could impact performance:

  • Inflation and Economic Uncertainty: Inflation remains a top risk. While it has eased from the 2022 peak, food costs are still elevated and volatile (e.g. droughts or diseases can spike certain commodity prices). The National Restaurant Association expects food-away-from-home inflation around 3% in 2025, which, though lower than 2022, is still above historical norms. If inflation reaccelerates or persists higher than wage growth, consumers may cut back restaurant spending. Additionally, higher costs for energy and utilities can crimp margins. Economic growth is a related factor – restaurants are cyclical; a recession or slowdown in 2026–2027 would pose a downside risk as consumers trade down to cheaper options or eat at home more. In short, the industry’s fortunes are tied to macroeconomic health. On the positive side, if the economy remains fairly robust and inflation moderate, restaurants should be able to grow sales in line with GDP. Chains learned during the pandemic to adjust quickly (pivot to delivery, etc.), so they are arguably more resilient now to economic swings than pre-2020, but discretionary spending swings will always be a risk.

  • Labor Market & Regulation: Labor will continue to be a double-edged sword. Labor shortages may persist, especially for skilled kitchen roles and management. This could cap how many hours restaurants can be open or how many tables they can serve, effectively limiting growth if not resolved. Rising wages are another facet – numerous states and cities will see minimum wage increases in coming years. For instance, by 2025, more states are moving toward $15/hour minimums, and pressure to eliminate the tip credit (paying tipped workers a lower base wage) is growing. Legislation like California’s recent fast-food wage law (though not directly targeting full-service) reflects a political climate of pushing restaurant wages higher. Higher labor costs could further tighten margins unless offset by price increases or productivity gains. There’s also regulatory risk around scheduling (predictive scheduling laws in some cities require setting worker schedules in advance or paying penalties), which can reduce flexibility. Immigration policy can also influence the labor supply for restaurant jobs. Finally, the franchise sector is watching the joint-employer regulations – a law or rule that made franchisors more liable for franchisee labor practices could increase costs for franchise companies or alter the franchise model. All told, labor remains one of the largest uncertainties: if the industry can’t attract enough workers or afford them, growth will be constrained. On the flip side, improved labor conditions (stabilized turnover, etc.) could enhance productivity and service, aiding growth.

  • Supply Chain and Tariffs: Restaurants are vulnerable to supply disruptions and trade policies because they rely on a global food supply chain. Tariffs on imported food products are an ongoing risk noted by industry observers. For example, tariffs or trade disputes affecting commodities like coffee (often imported from Latin America), seafood (much is imported), dairy or produce (e.g. avocados from Mexico) can drive up input costs for chain restaurants. IBISWorld specifically pointed out that tariffs on essentials such as coffee, seafood, and avocados are expected to increase food prices and squeeze margins if restaurants cannot pass along those costs. Geopolitical issues or a strengthening USD could also impact prices of imported wines, specialty ingredients, etc., used by many chains. Aside from tariffs, supply chain disruptions (like those seen during COVID or due to natural disasters) are a risk – although large chains have diversified suppliers and can often weather shortages better than independents. Some chains are bringing more sourcing domestic or holding more inventory to buffer against shocks. Additionally, transportation and fuel costs affect delivery of ingredients to restaurants. In the outlook period, we assume gradual improvements in supply chain efficiency, but unexpected disruptions or protectionist trade policies could introduce volatility in food costs and availability.

  • Changing Consumer Behavior: Another broad risk (or opportunity) is shifting consumer dining behavior. The pandemic accelerated trends like digital ordering, and it remains to be seen how that settles. For example, will consumers maintain a high level of delivery ordering (which is less profitable for restaurants due to delivery fees) or return more to in-person dining? There’s also competition from meal kits, grocery prepared foods, and direct-to-consumer meal delivery services that could limit restaurant traffic growth. If remote work continues at high levels, lunch traffic in city-center restaurants might remain soft, impacting chains like those in urban cores. On the other hand, more people working from home could mean more local suburban dining. Demographics play a role too: Millennials and Gen Z are now a huge customer base and they tend to demand different things (more tech integration, brand transparency, social media engagement, etc.). Chains that fail to connect with younger diners or adapt their offerings (for instance, offering plant-based options or global flavors that younger demographics enjoy) could fall behind. The NRA’s research shows younger generations put high importance on health, sustainability, and variety. Thus, the outlook for each chain will partly depend on how well they align with evolving preferences on these fronts.


Despite these risks, the overall sentiment for 2025–2030 is that the chain restaurant industry will continue to grow modestly. Many of the large publicly traded restaurant companies have robust expansion plans – for example, Texas Roadhouse has been opening ~30 new units annually and sees potential for hundreds more domestically; emerging fast-casual/full-service hybrids are also growing. There is also potential upside if international tourism rebounds strongly, as foreign visitors often frequent American chain restaurants (a factor for locations in tourist hubs like NYC, Orlando, etc.). Furthermore, the industry has shown it can adapt via new formats (drive-thru lanes at casual dining, virtual brands operating out of kitchens, pop-up concepts, etc.) to capture revenue in creative ways.


Emerging Trends: Several key trends are expected to shape the industry’s evolution through 2030:

  • Technology & AI Integration: The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation will deepen. By 2030, we anticipate AI to be embedded in many restaurant operations – from AI-driven kitchen automation (robots flipping burgers or automating prep tasks) to AI chatbots for reservations and customer service. Restaurants will use AI analytics for everything: predicting busy times (and adjusting staffing/orders accordingly), personalizing marketing offers to guests based on their dining history, and managing inventory with predictive ordering to reduce waste. Some chains are already testing autonomous drive-thru ordering systems and robotic waitstaff; these could become more common if labor remains scarce. The industry’s tech enhancements will also focus on improving the experience – for instance, tabletop tablets for ordering/payment, augmented reality menus, and seamless integration of loyalty programs (guests expect the convenience of paying via app, etc.). Tech not only offers efficiency but also data – by 2030, chains that harness customer data to tailor experiences (like knowing a regular customer’s preferences or dietary needs) could have a competitive edge. In essence, the restaurant of the future for chain brands will be smarter and more data-driven, though still centered on hospitality at its core.

  • Sustainability and ESG Initiatives: Sustainability is set to become even more significant. As noted, consumers (especially younger ones) are paying attention to restaurants’ environmental and social impact. Chains are responding by reducing food waste (some joining programs to donate excess food or using tech to forecast demand better), eliminating single-use plastics (many have phased out styrofoam and are moving to recyclable or compostable packaging for takeout), and sourcing locally when possible to reduce carbon footprint. By 2030, it’s likely that having clear sustainability practices will be almost a baseline requirement for major brands. This could include setting emissions reduction targets for their operations, shifting to renewable energy in restaurants, and offering more plant-based menu options (to cater to environmental and health-conscious diners). We also expect to see sustainable procurement – e.g. chains highlighting sustainably caught seafood, humanely raised meat, or fair-trade coffee – as a selling point. Social responsibility (part of ESG) will matter too: diversity and inclusion efforts in hiring, community giving programs, etc., can influence brand image. For instance, some chains are already marketing that they support local farmers or underrepresented suppliers. Overall, the trend is that sustainability and ethics will intertwine with brand value, and chains leaning into these areas could attract more customers (and avoid backlash or boycotts that have hit brands perceived as not socially responsible).

  • Menu Simplification and Innovation: Interestingly, two seemingly opposite forces are at play with menus – simplification and innovation. On one hand, as discussed, many chains have trimmed and will continue to streamline menus to focus on profitable core items and improve execution. The days of the 200-item menu are waning; instead, a tighter menu that still offers variety (but through easily versatile ingredients) is preferred. By simplifying, restaurants reduce back-of-house complexity, which improves speed and consistency – critical for both dine-in and the fast-growing takeout demand. On the other hand, culinary innovation remains important to draw repeat customers. We expect to see chains adopt a strategy of core menu stability plus frequent limited-time offers (LTOs) and seasonal specials to keep things fresh. The NRA’s 2025 forecast highlighted the popularity of LTOs and even things like menu “flights” (sampler platters) to entice diners. Chains will likely continue experimenting with global flavors and diet-specific offerings (e.g. keto-friendly or allergen-free dishes) as specials without overcomplicating their core menu. Also, beverage innovation (craft cocktails, zero-proof cocktails, local craft beer tie-ins) is an area chains are leveraging for differentiation. By 2030, expect menu development to be highly data-informed: if a new LTO performs well, it could become permanent; if not, it’s quickly swapped out. Menu strategy will also be influenced by cost pressures – for example, if beef prices spike, a chain might promote chicken or plant-based items more.

  • Off-Premise and Format Evolution: The growth of off-premise dining (takeout, delivery, drive-thru) is not a temporary blip but a structural shift. Chains are rethinking restaurant design – smaller dining rooms and dedicated pickup areas are becoming common. Ghost kitchens and virtual brands are another trend: some full-service chains launched virtual offshoot brands (often for wings, burgers, etc.) operating from their kitchens solely for delivery apps. This trend may continue, allowing chains to utilize kitchen capacity for incremental sales. We might also see more drive-thru integration in casual dining (e.g. some IHOPs and Applebee’s have tested drive-thru or curbside pickup lanes). The goal is to meet customers wherever they want to be – whether it’s a quick curbside meal or a traditional dine-in. By 2030, the mix might settle with off-premise being perhaps 30–40% of sales for casual dining (up from maybe 20% pre-pandemic), and many chains will have refined packaging and menu items that travel well to serve that demand.

  • Health and Wellness Focus: An emerging consumer-driven trend is health consciousness. We anticipate chain restaurants putting more emphasis on “better for you” options – not just a token salad, but genuinely healthier preparations, transparent calorie and nutrition info, and accommodations for various diets (vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free, etc.). The NRA’s culinary forecast for 2025 included things like “healthier kids’ menus” as a top trend, indicating families are seeking better nutrition even in casual dining. Menu items featuring whole grains, plant proteins, and lower sugar are likely to grow. That said, indulgence will always have a place (people still love a night out with rich foods), but providing balance and choice will be key to attracting a broad customer base regularly.


In conclusion, the 2025–2030 outlook for chain restaurants in the US is one of cautious growth, operational refinement, and adaptation to new norms. The industry has largely recovered from the pandemic shock, but now must navigate a landscape of slower growth, higher costs, and changing consumer expectations. Chains that invest in technology, embrace sustainability, optimize their menus, and deliver strong value will be well-positioned to thrive. Barring any major economic downturn, the sector should see steady if unspectacular growth. Full-service dining remains a cornerstone of American culture – people will continue to go out for the experience, convenience, and social aspect that chain restaurants provide. The coming years will likely see the industry become leaner, smarter, and more in tune with its customers, ensuring that chain restaurants remain a vibrant part of the American dining scene through 2030 and beyond.


Sources: 

  • IBISWorld, Chain Restaurants in the US, April 2025;

  • National Restaurant Association;

  • Nation’s Restaurant News and industry reports;

  • Barmetrix industry trends analysis;

  • Restaurant Dive / Plastic Container City cost analysis;

  • Deloitte insights ; and company financial disclosures.



 
 
 
Architectural site plan and CAD drafting layout created by InnoWave Studio for U
innowave studio logo black.png
info@innowave-studio.com —
 Email monitored 24/7
Phone: +1 (510) 519-9005
Mon–Thu 7am–10pm • Fri 7am–3pm
PRACTICE AREAS
  • RV parks, RV resorts & RV storage
  • Multi-Family developments
  • Mixed-Use development
  • Hotels & Motels
  • Industrial & Warehouse
  • Urban development
  • Site plan
  • Visualisation
  • Feasibility study for Rv parks & RV resorts
Innovative site plans and
Architectural visualizations
Service Company
InnoWave Studio, LLC
8 The Green, Suite A, Dover, DE 19901
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Copyright © 2024 Innowave Studio

bottom of page